<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: So the Conservatives Say They Want a Small Government?</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/so-the-conservatives-say-they-want-a-small-government/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/so-the-conservatives-say-they-want-a-small-government/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 13:03:40 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/so-the-conservatives-say-they-want-a-small-government/#comment-23981</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 08 Jul 2008 00:02:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2282#comment-23981</guid>
		<description>YES, CHECK IT OUT !!!

http://www.revolutionmarch.com

At the bottom of it there is a selection of 15 videos.
The last one (15th) tittled &quot;We the People - CHARLIE CHAPLIN speech remix&quot; is, if nothing else, worth taking a look.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>YES, CHECK IT OUT !!!</p>
<p><a href="http://www.revolutionmarch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.revolutionmarch.com</a></p>
<p>At the bottom of it there is a selection of 15 videos.<br />
The last one (15th) tittled &#8220;We the People &#8211; CHARLIE CHAPLIN speech remix&#8221; is, if nothing else, worth taking a look.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Giorgio</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/so-the-conservatives-say-they-want-a-small-government/#comment-23978</link>
		<dc:creator>Giorgio</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:45:02 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2282#comment-23978</guid>
		<description>&quot;It is the conservatives, not the liberals who gave birth, nurtured and fed this large overweight government. It is the liberals and progressives who have worked hard to keep it chained up and from devouring everything in its destructive path.&quot;

REALLY ???

Here is a conservative who honestly advocates for &#039;a government that functions for the people&#039; and its freedoms: RON PAUL !

www.revolutionmarch.com

CHECK IT OUT !!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;It is the conservatives, not the liberals who gave birth, nurtured and fed this large overweight government. It is the liberals and progressives who have worked hard to keep it chained up and from devouring everything in its destructive path.&#8221;</p>
<p>REALLY ???</p>
<p>Here is a conservative who honestly advocates for &#8216;a government that functions for the people&#8217; and its freedoms: RON PAUL !</p>
<p><a href="http://www.revolutionmarch.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.revolutionmarch.com</a></p>
<p>CHECK IT OUT !!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wayne A Lewis</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/so-the-conservatives-say-they-want-a-small-government/#comment-23974</link>
		<dc:creator>Wayne A Lewis</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 23:02:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2282#comment-23974</guid>
		<description>Yes, I agree about not using their labels. I assume you are saying: Not to use the term &quot;small government&quot; when arguing about the illogic of it, but to frame  our own terms.  If so, I agree.   I was hoping this article would attract those who aren&#039;t sure of were they stand; that when they hear that term again, they would know it isn&#039;t at all what it implies -- as with almost all of the conservative terminology.

thanks</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Yes, I agree about not using their labels. I assume you are saying: Not to use the term &#8220;small government&#8221; when arguing about the illogic of it, but to frame  our own terms.  If so, I agree.   I was hoping this article would attract those who aren&#8217;t sure of were they stand; that when they hear that term again, they would know it isn&#8217;t at all what it implies &#8212; as with almost all of the conservative terminology.</p>
<p>thanks</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Deadbeat</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/so-the-conservatives-say-they-want-a-small-government/#comment-23925</link>
		<dc:creator>Deadbeat</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 07 Jul 2008 03:51:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2282#comment-23925</guid>
		<description>More than 50% of the government budget is spent on the military.  The issue is not about &quot;less&quot; government.  The issue is about a government that functions for the plutocrats versus a government that functions for the people.  Currently &quot;law enforcement&quot; serves to protect the plutocrats and &quot;laws&quot; are written for the benefit of the plutocrats.

We shouldn&#039;t buy and adopt their labels.  We need to promote our own.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than 50% of the government budget is spent on the military.  The issue is not about &#8220;less&#8221; government.  The issue is about a government that functions for the plutocrats versus a government that functions for the people.  Currently &#8220;law enforcement&#8221; serves to protect the plutocrats and &#8220;laws&#8221; are written for the benefit of the plutocrats.</p>
<p>We shouldn&#8217;t buy and adopt their labels.  We need to promote our own.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Greenwood</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/so-the-conservatives-say-they-want-a-small-government/#comment-23822</link>
		<dc:creator>John Greenwood</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 16:15:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2282#comment-23822</guid>
		<description>I would be curious to know your views on the US Supreme Court&#039;s  ruling in Kelo vs. New London.  I submit, that, taken to it&#039;s logical conclusion, progressive thought leads to even worse outcomes, e.g., Zimbabwe and North Korea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I would be curious to know your views on the US Supreme Court&#8217;s  ruling in Kelo vs. New London.  I submit, that, taken to it&#8217;s logical conclusion, progressive thought leads to even worse outcomes, e.g., Zimbabwe and North Korea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozhidar balkas</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/so-the-conservatives-say-they-want-a-small-government/#comment-23799</link>
		<dc:creator>bozhidar balkas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 05 Jul 2008 12:08:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2282#comment-23799</guid>
		<description>smaller govt means less governance. or it  may mean more and more privatization of  what  we collectively do.
or it may  mean  less  socialism and more individualism and more disparity betwn rich and poor. thank u</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>smaller govt means less governance. or it  may mean more and more privatization of  what  we collectively do.<br />
or it may  mean  less  socialism and more individualism and more disparity betwn rich and poor. thank u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
