http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/rep-ackerman-defends-iran-sanctions-measure-but-critics-call-it-an-act-of-war/ a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/07/rep-ackerman-defends-iran-sanctions-measure-but-critics-call-it-an-act-of-war/#comment-25357 bozhidar balkas Wed, 23 Jul 2008 23:29:40 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2395#comment-25357 r amers, euros, zionists, et al by issuing threats to iran aware that such behavior on int'l level represent an act of war. such behavior cannot be deemed as negotiations. generally speaking, negotiation betwn two countries r held behind closed doors. so, r christian lands merely bluffing? it appears so! US does not need to threaten at all; it just attacks. we can also say that iran is here to stay and obtain nuclear energy. iran, i educe, knows s'mthing we don't. otherwise, it wdn't make sense to resist US unless iran can significantly retaliate. and, of course, if fireworks begin and flow of oil is restricted, many lands wd go ballistic over US/Euro/isr actions. i think US/EU/IOF r bluffing. thank u r amers, euros, zionists, et al by issuing threats to iran aware that such behavior on int’l level represent an act of war. such behavior cannot be deemed as negotiations.
generally speaking, negotiation betwn two countries r held behind closed doors.
so, r christian lands merely bluffing? it appears so!
US does not need to threaten at all; it just attacks.
we can also say that iran is here to stay and obtain nuclear energy.
iran, i educe, knows s’mthing we don’t.
otherwise, it wdn’t make sense to resist US unless iran can significantly retaliate.
and, of course, if fireworks begin and flow of oil is restricted, many lands wd go ballistic over US/Euro/isr actions.
i think US/EU/IOF r bluffing.
thank u

]]>