Comments on: Selling The Fireball: George Bush And Iran

By: evie

evie — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:52:08 +0000

Ok Arch. Thanks. I used to wonder if blissful might not be a better state to be in. ;)

By: Arch Stanton

Arch Stanton — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 18:23:58 +0000

I was being facetious evie because you post like you have a brain in your head. On the other hand, there’s Thomas Gray: “Where ignorance is bliss, ‘Tis folly to be wise.”

By: Tony S.

Tony S. — Thu, 26 Jun 2008 13:21:06 +0000

I guess any delusions of European “independence of thought” are finished. European thought is apparently lock-step with George W Bush’s fascist leadership. Once again Europe does not see the fascist threat.

By: evie

evie — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:36:55 +0000

Arch
Of course another world war is a bad thing. I try not to watch TV – there’s a reason it is called the “boob tube.” Don’t suck on it too much.

By: evie

evie — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:32:48 +0000

Zionism – first and foremost – is about profit/greed. Ideology is the smokescreen.

PNAC – one of 100s of sociopolitical stink tanks. Creative writers who dream up excuses, causes, ideology, to cover profiteering via war, and other methods which are slower but more palatable (humanitarian “aid”).

People always want 1 group they can definitively point to (other than their own social unit) and say “Yep Bubba, it’s all the fault of them damn ____ (fill in name of favorite scapegoat).

Tell me, how does Zionism hold such a grip on the USA’s short and curly? Does it also control Europe? Is it done by payoffs or polaroids or both?

Lemme see Bubba, who’s on the goat list so far … Bilderbergers, Neocons, Illuminati, the antichrist, the Pope, Islamofascists, second coming Jesus freaks, shape shifters, reptilians among us, Pod People, the Secret Team, the Final Stand of the White Race, the Masons, AIPACkers, Knights of the Templar, and Zionists (bad Jews) .

Thank goodness the CIA is not in on any of this stuff.

By: Arch Stanton

Arch Stanton — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 23:15:11 +0000

So evie, I assume you think WWIII is a bad thing? I also assume you don’t watch too much TV.

By: Deadbeat

Deadbeat — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 22:25:42 +0000

i’m doubtful that EU/US/IOF will attack iran. only extremely hateful people wd attack iran.

This is an extremely naive perspective but one that is all too common on the “left”. That is because many on the “left” is in denial about the influence that Zionism has especially on U.S. Foreign policy. It’s influence is why the nation got mired in Iraq.

See: Project For A New American Century (PNAC)

By: bozhidar balkas

bozhidar balkas — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 21:15:18 +0000

i’m doubtful that EU/US/IOF will attack iran. only extremely hateful people wd attack iran. remember, they r not dumb but imbued w. pathological hatred.
i do not see a single causative factor for attacking iran.
there was not a single causatie factor for invading afgh’n and iraq.
wars never go as predicted; prediction being, that US/IOF/EU can destroy all iranian nuclear energy production plants.
even use of nuclear bombs may not be able to stop iran in whatever it is ab to make.
we can also expect that world wd be enraged like never before if Nbombs were used. radioactive fallout may harm even some of the EU countries, turkey, russia and other regions.
thus i hope US is bluffing and hoping to, by mere threats, to persuade iran to abandon its atomic energy work.
but few if any nations wd succumb to threats. iran won’t, i believe.
thank u

By: evie

evie — Wed, 25 Jun 2008 19:06:40 +0000

Dear Media Lens
The “war on Iran” is all hype, fear mongering, distraction. Odds are extremely good the ruling class do not want WWIII. I repeat – do not want world war III or IV or whatever numeral is favored by the lying ass experts, “insiders” who have yapped about war on Iran for 4 years.

An attack on Iran, who would in turn retaliate on Israel and coalition troops in the region, and would bring all the world’s white folks into the fray, including Russia, and of course China and India would choose sides, and Latin America would pick sides.

“The remarks raised fears in London that Bush is “determined to take action against Iran before he leaves office in January,” the Independent reported.” Yeah, yeah, the same thing was said in the run up to election 2004 – Bush would attack Iran to ensure his reelection.

Attacking Iran, predicted often by the likes of Sy Hersh, etc., has passed its due date, several times. The coming attraction/trailers of War On Iran is the liberal/progressive politics of fear.

War on Iran or a “US led terrorist coaltion” – It ain’t gonna come to the theater. (BTW labeling US troops as terrorists will not further the “movement”).

Rather than the little sheople studying issues such as failing education, collapsing infrastructure, political corporate social corruption, immigration, inflation, unemployment, internal intentional destruction of the USA, etc. – instead we can run skeered and elect the one who we think will save us from a “future” war which is nothing more than political saber rattling, pissing contest, stalemate, deadlock, b.s.