<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Ex-British Army Chief in Iraq Confirms Peak Oil Motive for War</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/06/ex-british-army-chief-in-iraq-confirms-peak-oil-motive-for-war/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/06/ex-british-army-chief-in-iraq-confirms-peak-oil-motive-for-war/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 10:27:33 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: vodka</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/06/ex-british-army-chief-in-iraq-confirms-peak-oil-motive-for-war/#comment-22795</link>
		<dc:creator>vodka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 24 Jun 2008 08:05:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2211#comment-22795</guid>
		<description>war on iraq for oil... this is like going to the next street, kill a man living there that because he abused his family, take over his house, abuse his family and steal his stuff.

i feel so sick :(</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>war on iraq for oil&#8230; this is like going to the next street, kill a man living there that because he abused his family, take over his house, abuse his family and steal his stuff.</p>
<p>i feel so sick :(</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hp</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/06/ex-british-army-chief-in-iraq-confirms-peak-oil-motive-for-war/#comment-22709</link>
		<dc:creator>hp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 23 Jun 2008 02:57:18 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2211#comment-22709</guid>
		<description>I agree. Joint operation. And not the first by any means. Or the last.
The dirty rats.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I agree. Joint operation. And not the first by any means. Or the last.<br />
The dirty rats.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lev</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/06/ex-british-army-chief-in-iraq-confirms-peak-oil-motive-for-war/#comment-22597</link>
		<dc:creator>Lev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 17:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2211#comment-22597</guid>
		<description>Well I think the intel. agency you just mentioned  http://www.rense.com/general67/intel.htm       certainly knew what was going to happen beforehand, and not just because of the &quot;movers&quot; who took pictures of it, knowing just where to be at what time, but also an e-mail was sent to Odigo Systems in the WTC beforehand warning them to avoid going in that day. Another Israeli-owned company in the WTC, this one a shipping company, conveniently relocated at the beginning of September 2001, leaving only a skeleton crew in its old office in the WTC. Both companies would seem to have been warned by Mossad. Nevertheless I&#039;m not at all saying that Mossad pulled off the 9/11 false flag operation under the nose of the U.S. government, but rather that elements inside the U.S. government (with approval from the top definitely) planned and carried it out, Mossad knew of it as well and warned Odigo and the other company, and had agents positioned in the right place to record the events in Manhattan, if I had to guess, probably observing it for blackmail purposes later? For example what if they got photos of what crashed into the NORTH Tower instead of the constantly-seen South Tower photos/video? The North Tower crash happened first and wasn&#039;t meant to be recorded. Maybe for blackmail? To get a good deal on another few dozen F-15s or something? Who knows. Definitely though this was an American government operation and around the margins there may have been assistance from other countries&#039; intel. agencies for example the Pakistani ISI or Mossad but at the periphery. The ones who manipulated Atta and the other patsies into leaving a B-movie trail of &quot;evidence&quot; like a Koran left on a barstool, taking flying lessons (but doing pisspoor at it) etc., were definitely the C.I.A. In fact it&#039;s about certain that Atta and the others thought they were merely taking flying lessons so they could become C.I.A. drug pilots flying cocaine into Florida as the agency has done for decades. Little did they know that their purpose was only to leave &quot;evidence&quot; to flesh out the &quot;19 hijackers&quot; myth. Nobody hijacked anything on 9/11. And those guys never needed to know how to fly anything, simply having taken some lessons, no matter how poorly they did, was enough. 

By the way, if you look at still photos of the South Tower crash you can plainly see two rather large antennae underneath the fuselage that are not supposed to be there on a normal Boeing 767. Looks like the receivers for a remote control package.  Also consider that this was around the time that the Air Force was playing with the idea of having Boeing 767 tanker aircraft replace their aging tanker aircraft fleet (would have been called KC-767s), and it&#039;s the same airframe as a 767 passenger plane. All one would have to do is remove the refueling boom from the ass end of it, paint it up like a United Airlines aircraft, install the remote-piloting package including antennae that are plainly visible and voila! We have &quot;United Flight 175&quot;.  For the other 3 which were not supposed to be videotaped crashing they wouldn&#039;t even need all that, just three A-3 Skywarrior aircraft flown by remote control, packed with explosives and painted up like airliners. Take two real airliners&#039; flight manifests and split them in half (which explains why all 4 &quot;hijacked airliners&quot; were loaded to a ridiculously low capacity in terms of passengers-- because there were likely 2 instead of 4), have NORAD notify the pilots of the two in midair that &quot;terror threats against unspecified airports&quot; has made it necessary for them to turn off their IFF transponders and divert to a holding pattern over the Atlantic until it can be sorted out, have the Navy which was conducting exercises in the north Atlantic that morning shoot them down from miles away using radar-directed missiles and that disposes of the evidence. Two unidentified aircraft flying inbound toward the carrier battle group would make it easy to tell the fighter pilots that they were &quot;drones&quot; simulating &quot;hijacked aircraft as part of the Navy training exercise&quot;, they&#039;re cleared to shoot them down and they do. To this day those guys probably wouldn&#039;t know they shot down airliners full of people instead of drones. Meanwhile the remotely-piloted drone &quot;hijacked aircraft&quot; are hitting their targets. All of which is manifestly do-able for the U.S. military and C.I.A. especially considering all the necessary technology has been around for decades. The first remote control aircraft was a biplane back in 1918 so it&#039;s not exactly a new-fangled idea.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well I think the intel. agency you just mentioned  <a href="http://www.rense.com/general67/intel.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.rense.com/general67/intel.htm</a>       certainly knew what was going to happen beforehand, and not just because of the &#8220;movers&#8221; who took pictures of it, knowing just where to be at what time, but also an e-mail was sent to Odigo Systems in the WTC beforehand warning them to avoid going in that day. Another Israeli-owned company in the WTC, this one a shipping company, conveniently relocated at the beginning of September 2001, leaving only a skeleton crew in its old office in the WTC. Both companies would seem to have been warned by Mossad. Nevertheless I&#8217;m not at all saying that Mossad pulled off the 9/11 false flag operation under the nose of the U.S. government, but rather that elements inside the U.S. government (with approval from the top definitely) planned and carried it out, Mossad knew of it as well and warned Odigo and the other company, and had agents positioned in the right place to record the events in Manhattan, if I had to guess, probably observing it for blackmail purposes later? For example what if they got photos of what crashed into the NORTH Tower instead of the constantly-seen South Tower photos/video? The North Tower crash happened first and wasn&#8217;t meant to be recorded. Maybe for blackmail? To get a good deal on another few dozen F-15s or something? Who knows. Definitely though this was an American government operation and around the margins there may have been assistance from other countries&#8217; intel. agencies for example the Pakistani ISI or Mossad but at the periphery. The ones who manipulated Atta and the other patsies into leaving a B-movie trail of &#8220;evidence&#8221; like a Koran left on a barstool, taking flying lessons (but doing pisspoor at it) etc., were definitely the C.I.A. In fact it&#8217;s about certain that Atta and the others thought they were merely taking flying lessons so they could become C.I.A. drug pilots flying cocaine into Florida as the agency has done for decades. Little did they know that their purpose was only to leave &#8220;evidence&#8221; to flesh out the &#8220;19 hijackers&#8221; myth. Nobody hijacked anything on 9/11. And those guys never needed to know how to fly anything, simply having taken some lessons, no matter how poorly they did, was enough. </p>
<p>By the way, if you look at still photos of the South Tower crash you can plainly see two rather large antennae underneath the fuselage that are not supposed to be there on a normal Boeing 767. Looks like the receivers for a remote control package.  Also consider that this was around the time that the Air Force was playing with the idea of having Boeing 767 tanker aircraft replace their aging tanker aircraft fleet (would have been called KC-767s), and it&#8217;s the same airframe as a 767 passenger plane. All one would have to do is remove the refueling boom from the ass end of it, paint it up like a United Airlines aircraft, install the remote-piloting package including antennae that are plainly visible and voila! We have &#8220;United Flight 175&#8243;.  For the other 3 which were not supposed to be videotaped crashing they wouldn&#8217;t even need all that, just three A-3 Skywarrior aircraft flown by remote control, packed with explosives and painted up like airliners. Take two real airliners&#8217; flight manifests and split them in half (which explains why all 4 &#8220;hijacked airliners&#8221; were loaded to a ridiculously low capacity in terms of passengers&#8211; because there were likely 2 instead of 4), have NORAD notify the pilots of the two in midair that &#8220;terror threats against unspecified airports&#8221; has made it necessary for them to turn off their IFF transponders and divert to a holding pattern over the Atlantic until it can be sorted out, have the Navy which was conducting exercises in the north Atlantic that morning shoot them down from miles away using radar-directed missiles and that disposes of the evidence. Two unidentified aircraft flying inbound toward the carrier battle group would make it easy to tell the fighter pilots that they were &#8220;drones&#8221; simulating &#8220;hijacked aircraft as part of the Navy training exercise&#8221;, they&#8217;re cleared to shoot them down and they do. To this day those guys probably wouldn&#8217;t know they shot down airliners full of people instead of drones. Meanwhile the remotely-piloted drone &#8220;hijacked aircraft&#8221; are hitting their targets. All of which is manifestly do-able for the U.S. military and C.I.A. especially considering all the necessary technology has been around for decades. The first remote control aircraft was a biplane back in 1918 so it&#8217;s not exactly a new-fangled idea.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hp</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/06/ex-british-army-chief-in-iraq-confirms-peak-oil-motive-for-war/#comment-22569</link>
		<dc:creator>hp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 21 Jun 2008 04:01:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2211#comment-22569</guid>
		<description>Not to mention the &#039;usual suspects.&#039;

http://www.rense.com/general67/intel.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Not to mention the &#8216;usual suspects.&#8217;</p>
<p><a href="http://www.rense.com/general67/intel.htm" rel="nofollow">http://www.rense.com/general67/intel.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lev</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/06/ex-british-army-chief-in-iraq-confirms-peak-oil-motive-for-war/#comment-22537</link>
		<dc:creator>Lev</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 19:27:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2211#comment-22537</guid>
		<description>The Iraq War is so painfully obvious that it&#039;s about oil. And that&#039;s not all.

The &quot;bin Laden&quot; tapes are made by the same contractor  that claims to &quot;find&quot; them for the U.S. government which is how the wrong-colour-beard tape was &quot;intercepted&quot; 2 days before &quot;Al-Qaeda&quot; had a chance to put it online! The whole &quot;war on terror&quot; is fake, it&#039;s all about the U.S. getting its hands on as much oil and natural gas resources as it can as the era of cheap, easily-recoverable oil is over. &quot;Al-Qaeda&quot; is Al-CIAda; the people who attacked the U.S. on 9/11 have their headquarters in Langley, Virginia. Ever wonder how the uppermost floors of skyscrapers can &quot;fall&quot; THROUGH the remaining vast majority of solid building at freefall rate (as admitted by the 9/11 Commission and the N.I.S.T.) when common sense tells you that the only way in the real world that is possible is if something (e.g. explosives) reduces the solid majority of the building under the falling mass to a state of offering no more resistance than air? Otherwise it wouldn&#039;t &quot;fall&quot; through it at anywhere remotely close to freefall rate? Come on America, a 10-year-old with A.D./H.D. could realize that.  The whole thing was transparently a false flag operation done by elements in the U.S. government with approval from the top, to provide a pretext for open-ended resource wars.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Iraq War is so painfully obvious that it&#8217;s about oil. And that&#8217;s not all.</p>
<p>The &#8220;bin Laden&#8221; tapes are made by the same contractor  that claims to &#8220;find&#8221; them for the U.S. government which is how the wrong-colour-beard tape was &#8220;intercepted&#8221; 2 days before &#8220;Al-Qaeda&#8221; had a chance to put it online! The whole &#8220;war on terror&#8221; is fake, it&#8217;s all about the U.S. getting its hands on as much oil and natural gas resources as it can as the era of cheap, easily-recoverable oil is over. &#8220;Al-Qaeda&#8221; is Al-CIAda; the people who attacked the U.S. on 9/11 have their headquarters in Langley, Virginia. Ever wonder how the uppermost floors of skyscrapers can &#8220;fall&#8221; THROUGH the remaining vast majority of solid building at freefall rate (as admitted by the 9/11 Commission and the N.I.S.T.) when common sense tells you that the only way in the real world that is possible is if something (e.g. explosives) reduces the solid majority of the building under the falling mass to a state of offering no more resistance than air? Otherwise it wouldn&#8217;t &#8220;fall&#8221; through it at anywhere remotely close to freefall rate? Come on America, a 10-year-old with A.D./H.D. could realize that.  The whole thing was transparently a false flag operation done by elements in the U.S. government with approval from the top, to provide a pretext for open-ended resource wars.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidG.</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/06/ex-british-army-chief-in-iraq-confirms-peak-oil-motive-for-war/#comment-22507</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidG.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 20 Jun 2008 07:48:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2211#comment-22507</guid>
		<description>Problem is that oil and the industries it spawns is going to generate the demise of our planet.

My feeling (as an atheist) is that we are in  End Times and I’ve written several posts recently that explain why. Democracy is fast disappearing. The prophetic books: 1984 and The Handmaid’s Tale show us where we’re headed. Global warming caused by oil-based capitalism is a complicating factor as is fascism.

It’s going to get messy very, very soon. Why? Check my blog.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Problem is that oil and the industries it spawns is going to generate the demise of our planet.</p>
<p>My feeling (as an atheist) is that we are in  End Times and I’ve written several posts recently that explain why. Democracy is fast disappearing. The prophetic books: 1984 and The Handmaid’s Tale show us where we’re headed. Global warming caused by oil-based capitalism is a complicating factor as is fascism.</p>
<p>It’s going to get messy very, very soon. Why? Check my blog.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: synicab12</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/06/ex-british-army-chief-in-iraq-confirms-peak-oil-motive-for-war/#comment-22487</link>
		<dc:creator>synicab12</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 22:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2211#comment-22487</guid>
		<description>It is neither peak  oil nor  bottom oil. It is nothing but old fashioned
greed and imperialism where the main objective  is to control as much resources and people as possible. It is that simple.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It is neither peak  oil nor  bottom oil. It is nothing but old fashioned<br />
greed and imperialism where the main objective  is to control as much resources and people as possible. It is that simple.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Phil</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/06/ex-british-army-chief-in-iraq-confirms-peak-oil-motive-for-war/#comment-22482</link>
		<dc:creator>Phil</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 20:49:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2211#comment-22482</guid>
		<description>And of course, Ellery declined to give a single word of explanation as to why he thinks the US can guarantee stability, and why he thinks India and China wouldn&#039;t?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>And of course, Ellery declined to give a single word of explanation as to why he thinks the US can guarantee stability, and why he thinks India and China wouldn&#8217;t?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: bozhidar balkas</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/06/ex-british-army-chief-in-iraq-confirms-peak-oil-motive-for-war/#comment-22476</link>
		<dc:creator>bozhidar balkas</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 19 Jun 2008 17:37:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2211#comment-22476</guid>
		<description>as  i have  said  s&#039;mwhen-where,  a  country  w.o.  governance/government  is  much  worse than  w.  the worst  government.  doesn&#039;t  saddam  look  now ooh  soooo  goood?!  
a  puppet  gov&#039;t is  aslo  worse  than  no g overnment.  a puppet/installed gov&#039;t  is  actually an  oximoron; ie, people installed to  &#039;govern&#039;  by an  aggressor/occupier  do not govern  but do  minor errands; drink coffee, call aggressor  for instruction, argue w. wives, wear nice clothes, learn english, watch  US  TV, hope to settle in  el-amerikkah,  pass  lwas  that nobody  respects. etcetc. thank u</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>as  i have  said  s&#8217;mwhen-where,  a  country  w.o.  governance/government  is  much  worse than  w.  the worst  government.  doesn&#8217;t  saddam  look  now ooh  soooo  goood?!<br />
a  puppet  gov&#8217;t is  aslo  worse  than  no g overnment.  a puppet/installed gov&#8217;t  is  actually an  oximoron; ie, people installed to  &#8216;govern&#8217;  by an  aggressor/occupier  do not govern  but do  minor errands; drink coffee, call aggressor  for instruction, argue w. wives, wear nice clothes, learn english, watch  US  TV, hope to settle in  el-amerikkah,  pass  lwas  that nobody  respects. etcetc. thank u</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
