Arrests for War Resistance Increase Again

We can never forget that everything that Hitler did in Germany was ‘legal,’ and everything the Hungarian freedom fighters did was ‘illegal.’ It was ‘illegal’ to aid and comfort a Jew in Hitler’s Germany, but I am sure that if I lived in Germany during that time I would have comforted my Jewish brothers even though it was illegal… we who engage in nonviolent direct action are not the creators of tension. We merely bring to the surface the hidden tension that is already alive.

— Martin Luther King, Jr.

There have been over 15,000 arrests for resistance to war since 2002. There were large numbers right after the run up to and invasion of Iraq. Recently, arrests have begun climbing again. Though arrests are a small part of anti-war organizing, their rise is an indicator of increasing resistance.

The information comes from the Nuclear Resister, a newsletter that has been reporting detailed arrest information on peace activists and other social justice campaigns since 1980. Felice and Jack Cohen-Joppa, publishers of the Nuclear Resister, document arrests by name and date based on information collected from newspapers across the country and from defense lawyers and peace activists.

Since 2002, the Nuclear Resister has documented anti-war arrests for protestors each year:

2002 – 1800 arrests
2003 – 6072 arrests
2004 – 2440 arrests
2005 – 975 arrests
2006 – 950 arrests
2007 – 2272 arrests
2008 – 810 as of May 1

“Arrests for resistance to war are far more widespread geographically than most people think,” according to Cohen-Joppa of Nuclear Resister. “Yes, there are many arrests in DC and traditional big cities of anti-war activity — like San Francisco, NYC and Chicago, but there have also been anti-war arrests in Albany, Ann Arbor, Atlanta, Bangor, Bath, Bend, Brentwood, Burlington, Campbell, Cedar Rapids, Chapel Hill, Charlottesville, Chicopee, Colorado Springs, Denver, Des Moines, East Hampton, Erie, Eugene, Eureka, Fairbanks, Fairport, Fort Bragg, Fort Wayne, Grand Rapids, Great Dismal Swamp, Hammond, Huntsville, Joliet, Juneau, Kennebunkport, La Crosse, Los Angeles, Madison, Manchester, Memphis, Newark, Northbrook, Olympia, Omaha, Pittsburgh, Portland, Portsmouth, Providence, Richmond, Sacramento, San Diego, Santa Fe, Smithfield, Springfield, St. Louis, St. Paul, Staten Island, Superior, Syracuse, Tacoma, Toledo, Tucson, Tulsa, Vandenberg, Virginia
Beach, Wausau, Wheaton and Wilmington just to name a few.”

“In fact,” notes Cohen-Joppa, “in 2007, anti-war arrests were reported during 250 distinct events in 105 cities in 35 states and the District of Columbia. So far in 2008, arrests have been reported at 65 events in 43 different cities in 19 states and D.C.”

An example of the scope of resistance can be found in the Chicago-based Voices for Creative Nonviolence. They joined with other major peace groups like CODEPINK, Veterans for Peace, and the National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance in early 2007 to launch The Occupation Project, a campaign of resistance aimed at ending the Iraq War. Theirs was a campaign of sustained nonviolent civil disobedience to end funding for the U.S. war in and occupation of Iraq. The Occupation Project resulted in over 320 arrests in spring of 2007 in the offices of 39 U.S. Representatives and Senators in 25 states.

“I am energized by the dedication of so many conscientious activists across the country willing to take the risks of peace and speak truth to power,” says Max Obuszewski of the National Campaign for Nonviolent Resistance. “We have been unsuccessful so far in stopping this awful war and occupation of Iraq, but it is not for the lack of direct action. We are taking on the greatest empire in world history, but we will continue to act.”

“There are large numbers of new people being arrested,” notes Cohen-Joppa, “most typically saying, ‘I have tried everything else from writing to voting, but I have to do more to stop this war.’ The profile of people arrested includes high school teenagers to senior citizens, mostly people under 30 and over 50.”

Anti-war arrests are significantly under-reported by mainstream media. For example, around the fifth anniversary of the invasion of Iraq in March 2008, most news stories wrote that there were 150 to 200 arrests nationwide. Cohen-Joppa and Nuclear Resister report there were over double that number, well over 400, many outside the cities where regular media traditionally look.

Though arrests typically drop off in election years, as people’s hopes are raised that a new President or Congress will make a difference and stop the war, this year looks like arrests are likely to continue to rise. In part, that will depend on the attitude of authorities in Denver and Minneapolis, where the political conventions are being held. In 2004, New York City authorities overreacted so much to protestors at the Republican convention that they arrested historic numbers of protestors — including hundreds who had no intention to risk arrest. If Senator McCain is elected, anti-war resistance activities are expected to rise much higher.

Why do people risk arrest in their resistance to war? Perhaps Daniel Berrigan, on trial for resistance to the Vietnam War, said it best:

The time is past when good people may be silent
when obedience
can segregate us from public risk
when the poor can die without defense.
How many indeed must die
before our voices are heard
how many must be tortured dislocated
starved maddened?
How long must the world=s resources
be raped in the service of legalized murder?
When at what point will you say no to this war?
We have chosen to say
with the gift of our liberty
if necessary our lives:
the violence stops here.
The death stops here.
The suppression of truth stops here.
This war stops here.

Though war resistance activities and arrests have not stopped the war in Iraq, those struggling for peace remain committed. “None of us know what will happen if we continue to work for peace and human rights,” says a handmade poster of one involved in the resistance, “But we all know what will happen if we don’t.”

Bill Quigley is a professor of law at Loyola University New Orleans and Associate Legal Director at the Center for Constitutional Rights. He can be reached at: quigley77@gmail.com. Read other articles by Bill.

7 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. Rich Paul said on June 19th, 2008 at 5:48pm #

    It’s interesting that the poet above is interested exclusively in the deaths of “the poor”.

    I’m curious — at what annual level of income does a human being cease to matter? $1,000,000? $100,000? $50,000?

    I guess we also know what will happen if we work only for the human rights of some citizens — Socialism, Poverty, and Death.

  2. ron said on June 19th, 2008 at 6:49pm #

    Antiwar activism against the war should increase no matter whether McCain or Obama are elected if neither one stops the war!

  3. John Bo said on June 20th, 2008 at 9:30am #

    You obviously can’t judge when a human being ceases to matter by the level of their income, but $50,000 is usually a good starting point at when they quit showing human qualities, and therefore in my book – cease to matter.

  4. Brian Koontz said on June 21st, 2008 at 5:05pm #

    The wealthy are positioned well within the dominative hierarchy and thus it’s pointless to be concerned with them. There’s nothing wrong with being concerned with their welfare – AFTER those who are suffering under oppression and terror are taken care of – oppression and terror that the wealthy themselves are either actively or tacitly supporting and benefiting from.

    Sources of power don’t need help – they need destruction.

  5. MFG said on June 23rd, 2008 at 10:34pm #

    Land of the free. Freedom of speech. USA is the greatest country on earth, blessed by the Man himself. These are all things that the rest of the world hears from the corporate media (and R-wingers) in the States.

    There are numerous instances, in both corporate and indymedia, that excoriates the imprisonment of those in non-democratic countries for demonstrating against their government’s policies.

    Oddly enough, the finger never points at those same elements in play in the USA. Never in my political awareness (since Vietnam) have I seen such overt political imprisonment for those who stand up for their and their fellow countrypersons’ rights as in the last seven years.

    Free America’s political prisoners now! And they are just that. When will Americans fight for the right that they have so long proclaimed is their birthright? Don’t make us outside the USA fight for your rights. We will if we have to in order to protect our own, but shouldn’t you be doing for yourselves?

  6. Leigh said on June 24th, 2008 at 4:28pm #

    “Rich” Paul — Jesus was pretty interested in the poor, too. Did that make him a socialist? And how, exactly, exactly, exactly, is socialism as an ideology any worse for the common man than Reaganism-Bushism? (Also if you knew how to read a poem, you’d know that the word “indeed” moves the poem onward to include all people.)

    Stop being snarky and try to understand the gist of the article — that some people, even in these cynical times, are willing to give up their own liberty to win “liberty and justice for all.” What is nobler than that?

    Oh, yeah — and blessed are the peacemakers.

  7. Aaron Aarons said on June 29th, 2008 at 4:05am #

    While the number of arrests is an indicator of the level of resistance to the war, arrests themselves are not a good thing. I’d much rather be reading about, e.g., successful physical attacks against the military-industrial complex. especially with the perpetrators getting away, than about people getting arrested in symbolic actions.

    P.S. Sorry, Rich Paul, but there’s already far too much concern in out society for the lives and well being of the rich, who are the beneficiaries of the existing system of Capitalism, Poverty and Death.