<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Plan Colombia Heads for Mexico</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/05/plan-colombia-heads-for-mexico/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/05/plan-colombia-heads-for-mexico/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: evie</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/05/plan-colombia-heads-for-mexico/#comment-21209</link>
		<dc:creator>evie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 27 May 2008 14:34:25 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=2072#comment-21209</guid>
		<description>While your piece is overall accurate I take exception to a couple of points &quot;... FARC-EP and ELN resistance groups; Latin American expert James Petras calls the former the “longest standing (since 1964), largest peasant-based guerrilla (resistance) movement in the world...” 

I supported FARC as a people&#039;s resistance movement in the &#039;60s and &#039;70s but they failed to obtain and sustain the support of the masses, and today&#039;s generation of Farc-sters are thugs. They traffic drugs, run guns, kidnap, rape, murder. The elders are no longer freedom fighting heroes - but aging criminals, raising their young to maintain a lifestyle of jungle hegemony - by any means necessary. They are no longer a &quot;resistance&quot; but have become no different than those they fight against - and are very aware that the &quot;left&quot; in the US is simpatico.

Also &quot;...Corporate giants are in charge, mostly US ones.&quot; You might want to research the validity of that idea b/c after the mergers, takeovers, and buyouts which began in earnest under Reagan, not many corporate giants are solely &quot;US ones.&quot; For instance, the Chrysler plant in Mexico is actually a German owned corporation. Or as in Citibank which became Citigroup after acquiring Banamex and others. What with mergers and subsidiaries and trans-border holdings, corporations in charge have become one giant octopus of global interconnections.

The Merida Initiative will likely pass as so many US politicians are in bed with Mexico&#039;s pols - but congressional Democrats are pushing a similar idea/legislation regarding their favorite sector of the hemisphere to own and oppress - the Caribbean. 

As for the SPP/North American Union  -  imagine the silver lining. The creation of NAU is one small step toward the goal of a world w/o borders or countries or possessions and maybe no religions too, where the world can live as one (corporation).</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>While your piece is overall accurate I take exception to a couple of points &#8220;&#8230; FARC-EP and ELN resistance groups; Latin American expert James Petras calls the former the “longest standing (since 1964), largest peasant-based guerrilla (resistance) movement in the world&#8230;” </p>
<p>I supported FARC as a people&#8217;s resistance movement in the &#8217;60s and &#8217;70s but they failed to obtain and sustain the support of the masses, and today&#8217;s generation of Farc-sters are thugs. They traffic drugs, run guns, kidnap, rape, murder. The elders are no longer freedom fighting heroes &#8211; but aging criminals, raising their young to maintain a lifestyle of jungle hegemony &#8211; by any means necessary. They are no longer a &#8220;resistance&#8221; but have become no different than those they fight against &#8211; and are very aware that the &#8220;left&#8221; in the US is simpatico.</p>
<p>Also &#8220;&#8230;Corporate giants are in charge, mostly US ones.&#8221; You might want to research the validity of that idea b/c after the mergers, takeovers, and buyouts which began in earnest under Reagan, not many corporate giants are solely &#8220;US ones.&#8221; For instance, the Chrysler plant in Mexico is actually a German owned corporation. Or as in Citibank which became Citigroup after acquiring Banamex and others. What with mergers and subsidiaries and trans-border holdings, corporations in charge have become one giant octopus of global interconnections.</p>
<p>The Merida Initiative will likely pass as so many US politicians are in bed with Mexico&#8217;s pols &#8211; but congressional Democrats are pushing a similar idea/legislation regarding their favorite sector of the hemisphere to own and oppress &#8211; the Caribbean. </p>
<p>As for the SPP/North American Union  &#8211;  imagine the silver lining. The creation of NAU is one small step toward the goal of a world w/o borders or countries or possessions and maybe no religions too, where the world can live as one (corporation).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

