<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: The Tragedy of Afghan Aid</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/the-tragedy-of-afghan-aid/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/the-tragedy-of-afghan-aid/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 22 Nov 2009 12:21:18 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Shabnam</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/the-tragedy-of-afghan-aid/#comment-19341</link>
		<dc:creator>Shabnam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 00:00:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=1906#comment-19341</guid>
		<description>More than six years after the Bonn Agreement Afghanistan still needs more effective aid and better rural development. As Oxfam said: 

“The priority is to promote rural development, through building the capabilities of the state at local level and directing more resources to communities.”
Matt Waldman, Oxfam policy advisor in Afghanistan, said: 
&quot;Peace in Afghanistan cannot be achieved without more determined efforts to reduce poverty. &quot;
This view is supported by the governor of Kabul as well who was the guest of the  ‘Voice of America’  program in Persian on April 22, 2008. 
The governor of Kabul who must have close relationship with
Americans yet he was very pessimistic about the role of the United States and the West in general in Afghanistan and showed his discontent about the occupation of his country by the occupation forces.  People in Afghanistan, in the north, speak Persian which is called Dari in Afghanistan, one of the two major languages.  He wants Afghanistan to be build not to be treated as a colony and to leave its governing affairs in the hand of  Afghani people in collaboration with the  international community.  He complained about programs which have not been beneficial to the population because these programs did not include Afghani people and their needs and were created abroad in different western capitals to meet the needs of the occupation forces and their administration, the NGO’s.   He believes that one the reasons behind the failure of “aid” is that people in charge of this program did not bother to ask the population about their needs and their priorities.  He clearly believes that these programs helped NGO’s, the agent of the occupation, not Afghani people because Afghanistan needs  competent work force and one way to get experienced workers is to be involved in your own governmental affairs.  But apparently, most of the money goes towards maintaining the occupation administration,  NGO’s and their family, rather to help Afghani people who know better than these imperialist and Zionist agents whose priority is to get information on population to be used in their suppression and liquidation to extend the occupation.  
The governer of Kabul also did not consider Taliban as an enemy, who has been demonized by the enemy of Afghanistan and the region since they are our brothers and sisters, he said.  We should solve our
problems with negotiation not guns, he emphasized.
So, it is obvious that the occupation forces have different priorities for Afghanistan which neither are in the interest of the people nor  the  region.  Afghani population do not believe in neither occupation nor the “international community” mainly the rich western countries who are not interested in the well being of Afghani rather they are interested to turn Afghanistan into a dependent country where is not able to stand on its own feet, exactly like Iraq, and keep it as a consuming nation rather than a producing for its own needs using its own resources and human capital who are familiar with the needs of its own population.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>More than six years after the Bonn Agreement Afghanistan still needs more effective aid and better rural development. As Oxfam said: </p>
<p>“The priority is to promote rural development, through building the capabilities of the state at local level and directing more resources to communities.”<br />
Matt Waldman, Oxfam policy advisor in Afghanistan, said:<br />
&#8220;Peace in Afghanistan cannot be achieved without more determined efforts to reduce poverty. &#8221;<br />
This view is supported by the governor of Kabul as well who was the guest of the  ‘Voice of America’  program in Persian on April 22, 2008.<br />
The governor of Kabul who must have close relationship with<br />
Americans yet he was very pessimistic about the role of the United States and the West in general in Afghanistan and showed his discontent about the occupation of his country by the occupation forces.  People in Afghanistan, in the north, speak Persian which is called Dari in Afghanistan, one of the two major languages.  He wants Afghanistan to be build not to be treated as a colony and to leave its governing affairs in the hand of  Afghani people in collaboration with the  international community.  He complained about programs which have not been beneficial to the population because these programs did not include Afghani people and their needs and were created abroad in different western capitals to meet the needs of the occupation forces and their administration, the NGO’s.   He believes that one the reasons behind the failure of “aid” is that people in charge of this program did not bother to ask the population about their needs and their priorities.  He clearly believes that these programs helped NGO’s, the agent of the occupation, not Afghani people because Afghanistan needs  competent work force and one way to get experienced workers is to be involved in your own governmental affairs.  But apparently, most of the money goes towards maintaining the occupation administration,  NGO’s and their family, rather to help Afghani people who know better than these imperialist and Zionist agents whose priority is to get information on population to be used in their suppression and liquidation to extend the occupation.<br />
The governer of Kabul also did not consider Taliban as an enemy, who has been demonized by the enemy of Afghanistan and the region since they are our brothers and sisters, he said.  We should solve our<br />
problems with negotiation not guns, he emphasized.<br />
So, it is obvious that the occupation forces have different priorities for Afghanistan which neither are in the interest of the people nor  the  region.  Afghani population do not believe in neither occupation nor the “international community” mainly the rich western countries who are not interested in the well being of Afghani rather they are interested to turn Afghanistan into a dependent country where is not able to stand on its own feet, exactly like Iraq, and keep it as a consuming nation rather than a producing for its own needs using its own resources and human capital who are familiar with the needs of its own population.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: zhann</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/the-tragedy-of-afghan-aid/#comment-19331</link>
		<dc:creator>zhann</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 18:55:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=1906#comment-19331</guid>
		<description>It should be perfectly obvious why this money is spent on contracts by the donating nations.  In order for a country to remain wealthy, it needs to attract foreign investment, or better yet foreign money needs to pour in more than local money is poured out.  If governments simply gave money to the nations needing it, they would devalue their country and increase the value of the country gaining aid.  No rich person, let alone rich nation, would stand for such a thing.  Why was the USA so apposed to handing out contracts in Iraq to nations that didn&#039;t participate in the War?  This is economics 101.  Another important concept to take into account is how much money was flat out stolen.  Of course the contractors increased their rates to increase profits, but those handing out the contracts also received a fair share.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It should be perfectly obvious why this money is spent on contracts by the donating nations.  In order for a country to remain wealthy, it needs to attract foreign investment, or better yet foreign money needs to pour in more than local money is poured out.  If governments simply gave money to the nations needing it, they would devalue their country and increase the value of the country gaining aid.  No rich person, let alone rich nation, would stand for such a thing.  Why was the USA so apposed to handing out contracts in Iraq to nations that didn&#8217;t participate in the War?  This is economics 101.  Another important concept to take into account is how much money was flat out stolen.  Of course the contractors increased their rates to increase profits, but those handing out the contracts also received a fair share.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: sk</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/the-tragedy-of-afghan-aid/#comment-19304</link>
		<dc:creator>sk</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 27 Apr 2008 04:17:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=1906#comment-19304</guid>
		<description>A few more &lt;a href=&quot;http://balkanalysis.blogspot.com/2004/07/dark-star-safari-overland-from-cairo.html&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;observations&lt;/a&gt; by Paul Theroux on NGOs such as &quot;Blurred Vision&quot; or &quot;Shave the Children&quot; that rely on Third World misery for their &lt;i&gt;raison d&#039;être&lt;/i&gt;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few more <a href="http://balkanalysis.blogspot.com/2004/07/dark-star-safari-overland-from-cairo.html" rel="nofollow">observations</a> by Paul Theroux on NGOs such as &#8220;Blurred Vision&#8221; or &#8220;Shave the Children&#8221; that rely on Third World misery for their <i>raison d&#8217;être</i>.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: maha</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/the-tragedy-of-afghan-aid/#comment-19279</link>
		<dc:creator>maha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 15:49:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=1906#comment-19279</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not a mistake. It&#039;s standard practice, same old, same old. (And Oxfam along with other NGO actors and their lavish parties are part of it too.)  Victim creation and the aid industry is just another profit making business.  What would hugely benefit all countries is for the West and it&#039;s military to fuck off out of them.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not a mistake. It&#8217;s standard practice, same old, same old. (And Oxfam along with other NGO actors and their lavish parties are part of it too.)  Victim creation and the aid industry is just another profit making business.  What would hugely benefit all countries is for the West and it&#8217;s military to fuck off out of them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: evie</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/the-tragedy-of-afghan-aid/#comment-19272</link>
		<dc:creator>evie</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 26 Apr 2008 14:29:17 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/?p=1906#comment-19272</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s always been this way. Carpetbaggers.

You ask &quot;Why do we just make the same mistakes time and again.&quot; Not sure if that&#039;s a rhetorical quesion or not. But Einstein I think, defined doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results, as insanity.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s always been this way. Carpetbaggers.</p>
<p>You ask &#8220;Why do we just make the same mistakes time and again.&#8221; Not sure if that&#8217;s a rhetorical quesion or not. But Einstein I think, defined doing the same thing over and over and expecting different results, as insanity.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
