An Offer Hezbollah Cannot Refuse?

Nobody can impose terms on us, or commit us to anything we do not believe in. Let me be clear: Israel won’t get through politics what it didn’t get through war, even if the UN resolu­tion gave this to Israel. What they couldn’t do through war, they want to do by peaceful means? It doesn’t work like that.

— Hezbollah deputy secretary-general Naim Qassem, Al-Manar television, 15 August 2006

Joseph Robinette Biden, Jr (“just call me Joe–anything but Sue” as he does his Johnny Cash imitation) Chairman of the US Senate Foreign Relations Committee, and twice Presidential Candidate, is a friendly, loquacious, decent and knowledgeable fellow. Having served on that Committee for nearly a quarter century and traveled widely, Biden thinks of himself as someone who can be confronted with ‘deal breakers’ at the negotiation table and work out mutually acceptable solutions. “I’m the real deal bridge builder!”, he sometimes kids with his devoted staff, as he shadow boxes and mimics his favorite boxer, Evander “the real deal” Holyfield.

But the Bush administration is no favorite of Biden’s and he and others on Capitol Hill have run out of patience with its Middle East policy. Once Barack Obama, a junior member of his Foreign Relations Committee who has become his friend and who Biden has taken under his wing and tutored ‘on the ways of the World out there’ becomes President next January (as Biden and his staff believe he will—”unless the same dark forces, which have become stronger in the past few years, who killed Medgar Evers, Dr. Martin Luther King, Malcolm X, John and Robert Kennedy and several others have their way)”, we are, he thinks, “going to see some serious changes in US Foreign Policy starting with the Middle East.”

Some members of his bright Committee staff generally favor engagement with Hezbollah (privately) if the Party would agree. “The Party of God, not the Zionist controlled Democratic Party”, one staffer hastens to add.

When asked what they conclude the US would be willing to extend Hezbollah based on earlier feelers and offers and what they learned from Committee Staff discussions with White House Congressional liaison personnel, State Department contacts, and their own tuition, the following emerge:

Rebuilding Lebanon and Keeping Israel At Bay

“The US will consider funding a ‘Marshall Plan’ type operation for rebuilding South Lebanon and guarantee [that word again!] that Israel stays out. The US would be prepared to transfer directly to Hezbollah designated bank accounts “enormous sums of money to spend on the territories Israel destroyed, and equivalent sums to improve other deprived areas of the country”.

A Congressional media operative noted this off the record by email:

“Just ask Egypt and Jordan how we can sweeten a deal! Hezbollah should not worry about losing Iranian funding. We’ve got a lot more than they do!”

International Legitimacy

The Bush administration would anoint Hezbollah with the US imprimatur of ‘international legitimacy’, repeal the relevant targeting Executive orders and remove Hezbollah’s Information Unit (Al Manar TV, Radio Noor etc), its Construction Company (Jihad al Bina), its social service agencies and its financial institutions from the US Treasury and State department Terrorism lists.

Cluster Bomb Maps

The US will force Israel to turn over maps of planted land mines, cluster bomb maps and firing logs which the international community has been demanding for the past 18 months following the end of the 2006 July War. Hezbollah is greatly concerned about the unexploded ordnance terrorizing its popular base in the South. The Tyre based UN Mine Action Coordination Committee has so far uncovered 966 civilian locations where Israel dropped US cluster bombs covering an area of 39 million square meters. UNMACC Program Manager in Tyre Chris Clark estimates that de-miners have been able to locate and disarm 143,000 US supplied cluster bombs, but another million or more may remain. Since the end of the fighting in mid August 2006, the total number of people injured or killed is 296 according to Dalia Farren, Director of Media Relations at UNMACC.

To date the Bush administration has not demanded the maps from Israel, despite Lebanese continuing to die, because the State Department Office of General Counsel produced a Legal Memorandum which warns that if Israel releases the demanded information it will effectively constitute a self-indictment for War Crimes.

UNIFIL knows this but has chosen to keep quiet while routinely renewing its public demands knowing that Israel will not comply unless the US forces it. The Pentagon has no problem with “cutting the bastards (Israel) loose on this one and forcing them to ‘fess up”, according to a Congressional source.
A clarifying comment from one of the aforementioned Memorandum’s authors:

“The Winograd Commission claims that Israel used cluster bombs in accordance with international and US law has no support from the July 2006 record. Israel committed serial war crimes as well as wholesale violations of American law that no other country would be allowed to do.

In 1982 President Reagan cut off cluster bombs to Israel for 6 years. This time President Bush won’t touch the issue and Congress has buried the US Arms Export Act violations, hoping the public won’t demand its application. Some US officials complain that they have a hard time looking their Lebanese-American constituents in the eye. We are not proud of what’s become of their little country because of our weapons.”

Releasing Lebanese Prisoners in Israeli Jails and Territorial Sovereignty

· The US would obtain the release of all Hezbollah detainees and prisoners from Israeli jails;
· The US will force the return of Shebaa Farms, Ghajar, end Israeli over flights of Lebanese territory and violations of Lebanese sovereignty.

From Opposition to Government

· The US would secure a bigger role for Hezbollah in the Lebanese Government while establishing normal relations with the party, lifting all US travel constraints imposed on its members and supporters while cooperating with Hezbollah in forming a new government based on the results of the 2009 elections while encouraging a new census, the first once since 1933.

As a Library of Congress, Congressional Research Service, Lebanese specialist recently emailed:

Do you really think Lebanon’s hereditary tribal government is going to change? More than one-third of Lebanon’s Parliament constitutes family hand-me-down seats. If you agree that the Lebanese people are fed up with the ‘warlords’ how do you think we feel? There ought to be a one person, one vote system to elect their leaders. For me personally, dealing with a group that keeps its word would be a welcomed relief in my office. Hezbollah is quintessentially nationalist and can handle Iran and Syria. You get my meaning.

One staffer on the House subcommittee on the Middle East explained as background:

Personally, and I certainly don’t speak for the White House, I see the whole of Lebanon on the table. The right deal and Hezbollah can have it as far as I am concerned. What is the right deal? Our Committee Staff mainly believes Hamas will offer essentially a perpetual cease fire to Israel in exchange for all, repeat, all of the Palestine taken in 1967 and a return to the June 4, 1967 border with Jerusalem at its Capitol. That includes a full right of return for the 4.5 million Palestinian refugees. That means no checkpoints, no settlements, no outposts, no Israeli presence and no excuses!

If Hamas can accept this, then Hezbollah’s past statements regarding acceptance of a solution to the Question of Palestine arrived at by the Palestinians might mean peace.

Hezbollah’s Response

Hezbollah accepts dialogue as a matter of principle and axiom. Historically, the Shia culture generally and Hezbollah in particular is comfortable with discussions and exchanging ideas with friends and foes ranging from issues of war and peace to societal problems to religion and ways to improve peoples lives. It is prepared for dialogue over the question of Palestine, the bloodstream issue and central cause of Arabs and Muslims and increasingly people around the World.

However, Hezbollah has consistently rejected most US feelers because, as Secretary-General Hassan Nasrallah has stated, “our acquiescence to America’s demands would simply have meant abandoning our faith, our people and our history.”

As far back as November 16, 2001, Hassan Nasrallah explained Hezbollah’s past objections to US offers to the Kuwaiti daily Al-Rai Al-Aam:

As for their demand that we sever our connection to the Arab-Israeli conflict, that would mean the total elimination of Hezbollah’s head and heart, a complete disregard for the martyrs’ blood and a betrayal of their families’ tears, of our people and of their sacrifice. It would also mean giving up our religious and legal duty to come to the assistance of Palestine.

According to Hezbollah, the US has tried several times “to place us in a state of confrontation with what they called “Sunni fundamentalism”. They tried to provoke us along these lines, on the grounds that, in the future, Sunni fundamentalism will pose the gravest threat to Shiism”. The Bush administration, according to Hezbollah, also tried to get Iran to attack the Taliban and provoke a Shia-Sunni confrontation. But Iran did not fall into the trap.

With respect to the bargaining chip of pulling back from the Palestinian cause, Hezbollah considers that it has, in the words of Nasrallah, “a moral, humanitarian, religious, patriotic, and national duty towards the Palestinians”.

Hezbollah believes that peace will come to Palestine and the region not through a phony ‘peace process’ trying to buy off the Palestinian or Lebanese Resistance but when the occupation ends. It really is that simple. And until the Bush administration or its successor in Washington really understand this, negotiations will remain just talk.

One Hezbollah acquaintance stated: “We need to ensure at the beginning of negotiations that the occupation ends. Then peace can be made between states. An occupied people cannot make peace with its occupiers”.

With respect to the current ‘situation’ in Lebanon, Hezbullah’s international relations officer, Nawaf Moussawi stated recently that the “most dangerous thing in US policies currently [has been] their engagement in the blatant disruption of attempts at dialogue and consensus among Lebanese political forces.” Moussawi added that the US was engaged in “deepening political and sectarian divides within each confession in order to ignite mobile civil wars.” He stressed that the freedom of Lebanon could only come through its “self-defense capabilities, including those of the resistance” and that independence could only be attained through consensus and unity.

What the Hezbollah leadership discusses in its Shura Council becomes public knowledge only when Hezbollah wants it to. But until today Hezbollah views US proposals with deep suspicion and as calculated to advance Israel’s agenda in the region.

Hezbollah is no stranger to the Bush Administration carrot and stick pattern of wooing and then harshly threatening if overtures are spurned. Hezbollah respects the American people but views most of the recent American governments proposals “as nothing but a political bomb meant to destroy Hezbollah, since they cannot of course destroy us by dropping a nuclear bomb on us,” as Hezbollah’s Secretary General Nasrallah has said.

Regarding the future, Nasrallah told the Kuwaiti Daily Al-Rai Al-Aam,

We are not at all worried. We are holding fast to the options that our legitimate, religious, national, humane, and moral commitments impose on us, and do not think that the US will carry out military operations in this region. At any rate, they do not have valid pretexts for doing so, and we stand firms in our positions, our path, and our convictions.

Many in Washington would favor dialogue with Hezbollah. It remains to be seen if ‘bridge builders’ can make that happen and if we are going to see some serious changes in US Foreign Policy starting with the Middle East.

Franklin Lamb is author of the recently released book, The Price We Pay: A Quarter Century of Israel's Use of American Weapons in Lebanon. His volume Hezbollah: A Brief Guide for Beginners is due out soon. He can be reached at fplamb@gmail.com. Read other articles by Franklin, or visit Franklin's website.

6 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. hp said on April 25th, 2008 at 9:25am #

    So, self declared ‘Zionist Joe’ wants to rebuild Lebanon with our semi-worthless tax dollars? Then ‘guarantee’ to Hizbollah the reining in, taming even, of Israel. Anything else? Walk on water? Cure the blind? I’m sure Hizbollah is jumpimg for joy at ‘Zionist Joe’s’ perfectly honest and believable offer(s). We smokum peace pipe. OK……
    Sounds like another bone for Israel, taking them off the hook for destroying all the civilian infrastructure while engaging in all those war crimes they call war. And, as usual, we Joe average American broke taxpayers pay.
    Fool me once shame on you, fool me three hundred times, shame on me.
    To equate Zionist Israel, and Joe, with ‘bridge building’ is like asking us to believe General Custer had Sitting Bull’s best interests at heart.
    I especially liked the part where the ‘one staffer’ says ‘the Party of God, not the Zionist controlled Democratic Party.’ I was laughing all the way to the toilet.

  2. Jay said on April 25th, 2008 at 10:11am #

    Another attempt at appeasement..

    Sadly American politicians still fail to grasp the real motives behind radical entities in the ME. The goal of such groups is not about driving the US out or simply pressuring Israel to pull back to the pre-67 borders, but a far more dangerous and complex scheme.

    No American carrots can alter HA’s ideology which is based on the Iran’s Khomeani and Welat-el-Fakhi. The naively thinking politician who goes on a 2-day ‘fact finding mission’ in the ME thinks he could make a deal with HA should go learn Arabic first, then listen to the speeches made by Nasralha as far back as the early 80’s. Maybe then such ‘bridge builders’ or other ‘staffers’ could appreciate the exsitantle threat pro-democracy and moderate groups in Lebanon and ME at large are facing.

  3. Abe Bird said on April 25th, 2008 at 1:44pm #

    I see that Franklin Lamb makes’ fool’ of others. Franklin Lamb’s plan is not realistic. “966 civilian locations where Israel dropped US cluster bombs” are locations that Hezbollah fired from into Israel. Most of the cluster bombs are Israeli made. Using of cluster bomb is legitimate. Israel has no obligation to give any information to the Lebanese because they hold their information about the 2 kidnapped soldiers by Hezbollah. If some one wants fair play lets play it fair all the way.

    Its very weird that Mr. Franklin Lamb has nothing to say about Hezbollah rocketing Israel civilians by purpose with almost 6000 different kind of rockets !!!

    Israel has nothing to look for in Lebanon. But Israel had been forced by various terror organizations acting from Lebanon against Israel for the last 45 years to intervene and act in all proper means to stop the Muslim aggression.

    Lebanon was in civil war before Israel invaded Lebanon in 1979 and then in 1982, and still in frangible political dispute 8 years since Israel left Lebanon. Hezbollah is inside terror entity with its own “president” and government. The state of Lebanon is paralyzed and surrenders to any Hezbollah’s demand or threat. This is abnormal political situation that threats to push Lebanon into civil war again.

    Hezbollah as Hamas are not partner for peace with Israel. The ultimate goal of all Islamic terror groups, Shiites as Sunnis, is to annihilate and eliminate the “Jewish entity” and create a new Arab state all over Palestine, included Jordan. Those extremist Muslims update their tactical political stand in order to gain tactical achievements in their way implement, their final solution. http://www.isracast.com/article.aspx?ID=916 .

    Sorry, extreme Muslims are not partners for peace. Any where in the world, not only around Israel.

  4. Mike McNiven said on April 25th, 2008 at 2:11pm #

    Mr.Lamb,

    If you study the US relations with Latin America, during the past thirty years, you would learn that Biden is not a “decent” person! Also, Obama does not have anything in common with Dr.King Or X except benefiting from their struggles — without offering any thanks!

  5. bozhidar balkas said on April 27th, 2008 at 8:39am #

    re: abe bird’s comments.
    u say 6,000 rockets fired at israel. i’ve read lotsof material but haven’t to date seen a UN report abt this. even u ommit causative factors . as always, zionists only defend selves. onbly zionist a hav e causes for thiewr actons an arab noway hose!
    it is obvious that even palestinian resistance has utterly failed. an unprovoked attack on on e of the strongest miltary countries will succeed?
    or ar e u implying that arabushim are morons? one would have to be a retard to attack israrel in view of the fact that isarel is de facto american 52nd state. any attack on that land means de facto an attack on US.
    “israel doesn’t want part of lebanon” but torah does and the zionist do. most israelis may not. most of them are darkies and may be sick and tired of the ashkenazi using them as cannon fodder for their torahic dreams and shephardi nightmares.
    what a house of horrors?
    if i was god i would have given (given, and not promised) jews a planet of their own. thank u.
    “hamas.hezbos not partner in peace” . of course, u may mean IOF/US ‘peace’ ? to obtain A peace or THE peace we need more than one hand clapping.

  6. hp said on April 27th, 2008 at 9:34am #

    Maybe he made a mistake and it’s really 6 million rockets.