<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Adieu, Randi Rhodes</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hue Longer</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18696</link>
		<dc:creator>Hue Longer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 19 Apr 2008 08:06:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18696</guid>
		<description>Air America sucks...the only guy they had was Malloy and even he got on the come save us Gore bandwagon (for a buck, I&#039;m sure).  The worst think about AAR is that it accepts corporate media definitions and tricks people into thinking they are progressive.  Their AP newswire breaks suck worse than Rhandi Rhoads

Good point Rich,

I say we beat the Dems...we can&#039;t beat the Repugs, but we can get rid of Dems. Create the vacuum.  The great thing about McCain getting in is that liberals won&#039;t go to sleep at the wheel while thinking the only crimes being committed are cigar scandals</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Air America sucks&#8230;the only guy they had was Malloy and even he got on the come save us Gore bandwagon (for a buck, I&#8217;m sure).  The worst think about AAR is that it accepts corporate media definitions and tricks people into thinking they are progressive.  Their AP newswire breaks suck worse than Rhandi Rhoads</p>
<p>Good point Rich,</p>
<p>I say we beat the Dems&#8230;we can&#8217;t beat the Repugs, but we can get rid of Dems. Create the vacuum.  The great thing about McCain getting in is that liberals won&#8217;t go to sleep at the wheel while thinking the only crimes being committed are cigar scandals</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Griffin</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18641</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 15:10:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18641</guid>
		<description>The Supreme Court issue: guess what? Some of the most destructive justices for us have been appointed by liberal Democrats! So that argument simply doesn&#039;t wash with me. I don&#039;t trust Obama with this decision at all. I&#039;ll work for progressives, such as Ed O&#039;Reilly, who is running against Sen. John Kerry, for the U.S. Senate. And other progressives, for everything from city council, mayor, governor, congress, etc. And it doesn&#039;t matter which party affiliation they have: they just need to be true progressives!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Supreme Court issue: guess what? Some of the most destructive justices for us have been appointed by liberal Democrats! So that argument simply doesn&#8217;t wash with me. I don&#8217;t trust Obama with this decision at all. I&#8217;ll work for progressives, such as Ed O&#8217;Reilly, who is running against Sen. John Kerry, for the U.S. Senate. And other progressives, for everything from city council, mayor, governor, congress, etc. And it doesn&#8217;t matter which party affiliation they have: they just need to be true progressives!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shields</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18628</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 12:21:05 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18628</guid>
		<description>joe7302
What we need is more democracy not less, joe!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>joe7302<br />
What we need is more democracy not less, joe!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: jacksmith</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18622</link>
		<dc:creator>jacksmith</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 09:05:29 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18622</guid>
		<description>DON&#039;T BE DUPED !!!

Large numbers of Republicans have been voting for Barack Obama in the DEMOCRATIC primaries, and caucuses from early on. Because they feel he would be a weaker opponent against John McCain. With Hillary Clinton you are almost 100% certain to get quality, affordable universal health care very soon.

But first, all of you have to make certain that Hillary Clinton takes the democratic nomination and then the Whitehouse. NOW! is the time. THIS! is the moment you have all been working, and waiting for. You can do this America. “Carpe diem” (harvest the day).

I think Hillary Clinton see’s a beautiful world of  plenty for all. She’s a woman, and a mother. And it’s time America. Do this for your-selves, and your children’s future. You will have to work together on this and be aggressive, relentless, and creative. Americans face an even worse catastrophe ahead than the one you are living through now.

You see, the medical and insurance industry mostly support the republicans with the money they ripped off from you. And they don’t want you to have quality, affordable universal health care. They want to be able to continue to rip you off, and kill you and your children by continuing to deny you life saving medical care that you have already paid for. So they can continue to make more immoral profits for them-selves.

Hillary Clinton has actually won by much larger margins than the vote totals showed. And lost by much smaller vote margins than the vote totals showed. Her delegate count is actually much higher than it shows. And higher than Obama’s. She also leads in the electoral college numbers that you must win to become  President in the November national election. HILLARY CLINTON IS ALREADY THE TRUE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE!

As much as 30% of Obama&#039;s primary, and caucus votes are Republicans trying to choose the weakest democratic candidate for McCain to run against. These Republicans have been gaming the caucuses where it is easier to vote cheat. This is why Obama has not been able to win the BIG! states primaries. Even with Republican vote cheating help.

Hillary Clinton has been OUT MANNED! OUT GUNNED! and OUT SPENT! 4 and 5 to 1. Yet Obama has only been able to manage a very tenuous, and questionable tie with Hillary Clinton.

If Obama is the democratic nominee for the national election in November he will be slaughtered. Because the Republican vote cheating help will suddenly evaporate. All of this vote fraud and republican manipulation has made Obama falsely look like a much stronger candidate than he really is. YOUNG PEOPLE. DON’T BE DUPED! Think about it. You have the most to lose.

The democratic party needs to fix this outrage. Everyone needs to throw all your support to Hillary Clinton NOW! So you can end this outrage against YOU the voter, and against democracy.

The democratic party, and the super-delegates have a decision to make. Are the democrats, and the democratic party going to choose the DEMOCRATIC party nominee to fight for the American people. Or are the republicans going to choose the DEMOCRATIC party nominee through vote fraud, and gaming the DEMOCRATIC party primaries, and caucuses.

Fortunately the Clinton’s have been able to hold on against this fraudulent outrage with those repeated dramatic comebacks of Hillary Clinton’s. Only the Clinton’s are that resourceful, and strong. Hillary Clinton is your NOMINEE. They are the best I have ever seen.

“This is not a game” (Hillary Clinton)

Sincerely

jacksmith... Working Class :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>DON&#8217;T BE DUPED !!!</p>
<p>Large numbers of Republicans have been voting for Barack Obama in the DEMOCRATIC primaries, and caucuses from early on. Because they feel he would be a weaker opponent against John McCain. With Hillary Clinton you are almost 100% certain to get quality, affordable universal health care very soon.</p>
<p>But first, all of you have to make certain that Hillary Clinton takes the democratic nomination and then the Whitehouse. NOW! is the time. THIS! is the moment you have all been working, and waiting for. You can do this America. “Carpe diem” (harvest the day).</p>
<p>I think Hillary Clinton see’s a beautiful world of  plenty for all. She’s a woman, and a mother. And it’s time America. Do this for your-selves, and your children’s future. You will have to work together on this and be aggressive, relentless, and creative. Americans face an even worse catastrophe ahead than the one you are living through now.</p>
<p>You see, the medical and insurance industry mostly support the republicans with the money they ripped off from you. And they don’t want you to have quality, affordable universal health care. They want to be able to continue to rip you off, and kill you and your children by continuing to deny you life saving medical care that you have already paid for. So they can continue to make more immoral profits for them-selves.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton has actually won by much larger margins than the vote totals showed. And lost by much smaller vote margins than the vote totals showed. Her delegate count is actually much higher than it shows. And higher than Obama’s. She also leads in the electoral college numbers that you must win to become  President in the November national election. HILLARY CLINTON IS ALREADY THE TRUE DEMOCRATIC NOMINEE!</p>
<p>As much as 30% of Obama&#8217;s primary, and caucus votes are Republicans trying to choose the weakest democratic candidate for McCain to run against. These Republicans have been gaming the caucuses where it is easier to vote cheat. This is why Obama has not been able to win the BIG! states primaries. Even with Republican vote cheating help.</p>
<p>Hillary Clinton has been OUT MANNED! OUT GUNNED! and OUT SPENT! 4 and 5 to 1. Yet Obama has only been able to manage a very tenuous, and questionable tie with Hillary Clinton.</p>
<p>If Obama is the democratic nominee for the national election in November he will be slaughtered. Because the Republican vote cheating help will suddenly evaporate. All of this vote fraud and republican manipulation has made Obama falsely look like a much stronger candidate than he really is. YOUNG PEOPLE. DON’T BE DUPED! Think about it. You have the most to lose.</p>
<p>The democratic party needs to fix this outrage. Everyone needs to throw all your support to Hillary Clinton NOW! So you can end this outrage against YOU the voter, and against democracy.</p>
<p>The democratic party, and the super-delegates have a decision to make. Are the democrats, and the democratic party going to choose the DEMOCRATIC party nominee to fight for the American people. Or are the republicans going to choose the DEMOCRATIC party nominee through vote fraud, and gaming the DEMOCRATIC party primaries, and caucuses.</p>
<p>Fortunately the Clinton’s have been able to hold on against this fraudulent outrage with those repeated dramatic comebacks of Hillary Clinton’s. Only the Clinton’s are that resourceful, and strong. Hillary Clinton is your NOMINEE. They are the best I have ever seen.</p>
<p>“This is not a game” (Hillary Clinton)</p>
<p>Sincerely</p>
<p>jacksmith&#8230; Working Class :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: joe73072</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18593</link>
		<dc:creator>joe73072</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 18 Apr 2008 00:14:24 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18593</guid>
		<description>randi may have gotten shrill lately, but she is on target more often than  not.

tom hartmann and rachel maddow are the only somewhat sane voices left on Air America. and sam seder on sunday. they need to join randi and mike malloy at NovaM

Martha and Rich .....go ahead and vote for Nader. watch the Supreme Court move even further to the right if the GOP wins this time.   be a purist at the foodprocessor, not the voting booth.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>randi may have gotten shrill lately, but she is on target more often than  not.</p>
<p>tom hartmann and rachel maddow are the only somewhat sane voices left on Air America. and sam seder on sunday. they need to join randi and mike malloy at NovaM</p>
<p>Martha and Rich &#8230;..go ahead and vote for Nader. watch the Supreme Court move even further to the right if the GOP wins this time.   be a purist at the foodprocessor, not the voting booth.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shields</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18587</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 22:39:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18587</guid>
		<description>Obama progressive? Can anybody say Dan Gerstein? He&#039;s an Obama spokesperson. Anyone know Gerstein? He was the non-stop hatemongering spokesperson for Joseph I. Lieberman (the uber-warmongering zionist) when Lieberman was up against anti-war candidate Ned Lamont in the CT Senate race.

Again, Obama is what?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama progressive? Can anybody say Dan Gerstein? He&#8217;s an Obama spokesperson. Anyone know Gerstein? He was the non-stop hatemongering spokesperson for Joseph I. Lieberman (the uber-warmongering zionist) when Lieberman was up against anti-war candidate Ned Lamont in the CT Senate race.</p>
<p>Again, Obama is what?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Elizabeth</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18576</link>
		<dc:creator>Elizabeth</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 19:28:58 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18576</guid>
		<description>With regards to Thom Hartmann and his subsequent canonization within the article:

I find Mr. Hartmann&#039;s  continued censorship and unwilingness to allow discussions and criticisms regarding Israel a rather sad indicator of his own prejudice, not to mention chronic unwillingness to confront the realities and abuses continuously and neverendingly being targeted at the Palestinians.  It is a desperate situation that bodes of racism, elitism and barbarism against those who are essentially being fenced in and rounded up like animals by the Israeli government.   We must speak out about such abuse and Mr. Hartmann and others do no service by deliberately ignoring and or denying such realities.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>With regards to Thom Hartmann and his subsequent canonization within the article:</p>
<p>I find Mr. Hartmann&#8217;s  continued censorship and unwilingness to allow discussions and criticisms regarding Israel a rather sad indicator of his own prejudice, not to mention chronic unwillingness to confront the realities and abuses continuously and neverendingly being targeted at the Palestinians.  It is a desperate situation that bodes of racism, elitism and barbarism against those who are essentially being fenced in and rounded up like animals by the Israeli government.   We must speak out about such abuse and Mr. Hartmann and others do no service by deliberately ignoring and or denying such realities.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Erroll</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18575</link>
		<dc:creator>Erroll</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 18:41:35 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18575</guid>
		<description>Martha

Well said.  For close to a year I had practically begged Olbermann to present more anti-war voices on his program though he did, shockingly, have former Lt. Gen. William Odom on his program last week, who is advocating that the U.S. immediately withdraw its forces from Iraq.  For my efforts, I was blocked from sending any more emails to Countdown.  So much for this quasi liberal allowing points of view which run counter to those of that defense contractor who owns MSNBC,  General Electric.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Martha</p>
<p>Well said.  For close to a year I had practically begged Olbermann to present more anti-war voices on his program though he did, shockingly, have former Lt. Gen. William Odom on his program last week, who is advocating that the U.S. immediately withdraw its forces from Iraq.  For my efforts, I was blocked from sending any more emails to Countdown.  So much for this quasi liberal allowing points of view which run counter to those of that defense contractor who owns MSNBC,  General Electric.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Martha</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18556</link>
		<dc:creator>Martha</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:27:41 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18556</guid>
		<description>Randi Rhodes is a queen bee.  Not only did she attack Ralph Nader, she was even worse to Patti Smith for supporting Ralph Nader.  I will never forget that.  The article is correct that Rhodes had to go.  On all other points, I disagree.  Rachel Maddow was a war  cheerleader through 2006.  She is a corporatist and you&#039;re not listening closely if you&#039;re mistaking her for a &#039;progressive&#039; or anyone worth listening.  She had a screaming fit on air one day when the boards were calling out the non-stop pro-war nonsense of Unfiltered.  
Obama doesn&#039;t deserve the nomination.  Obama doesn&#039;t deserve to be president.  Obama will not end the Iraq war.  Cynthia McKinney and Ralph Nader are real choices.
The author reduces Randi Rhodes&#039; sexist remarks (she is a queen bee) to Hillary Clinton.  Randi Rhodes used the same phrase for Geraldine Ferraro.  That needs to be called out.  Not for foul language but for the sexist statments.
The Air America event was organized and attended by Barack Obama supporters and promoted on Obama&#039;s webpage.  Another detail the author can&#039;t find but he&#039;s apparently busy soaking up Keith Olberman -- another corporatist and a vile sexist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Randi Rhodes is a queen bee.  Not only did she attack Ralph Nader, she was even worse to Patti Smith for supporting Ralph Nader.  I will never forget that.  The article is correct that Rhodes had to go.  On all other points, I disagree.  Rachel Maddow was a war  cheerleader through 2006.  She is a corporatist and you&#8217;re not listening closely if you&#8217;re mistaking her for a &#8216;progressive&#8217; or anyone worth listening.  She had a screaming fit on air one day when the boards were calling out the non-stop pro-war nonsense of Unfiltered.<br />
Obama doesn&#8217;t deserve the nomination.  Obama doesn&#8217;t deserve to be president.  Obama will not end the Iraq war.  Cynthia McKinney and Ralph Nader are real choices.<br />
The author reduces Randi Rhodes&#8217; sexist remarks (she is a queen bee) to Hillary Clinton.  Randi Rhodes used the same phrase for Geraldine Ferraro.  That needs to be called out.  Not for foul language but for the sexist statments.<br />
The Air America event was organized and attended by Barack Obama supporters and promoted on Obama&#8217;s webpage.  Another detail the author can&#8217;t find but he&#8217;s apparently busy soaking up Keith Olberman &#8212; another corporatist and a vile sexist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hp</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18554</link>
		<dc:creator>hp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 15:16:12 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18554</guid>
		<description>&#039;Misogynist: A man who hates women as much as women hate one another.&#039;
Mencken</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8216;Misogynist: A man who hates women as much as women hate one another.&#8217;<br />
Mencken</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rich Griffin</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18541</link>
		<dc:creator>Rich Griffin</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 17 Apr 2008 12:55:14 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/04/adieu-randi-rhodes/#comment-18541</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m glad Randi Rhodes is gone. I don&#039;t want left leaning talk radio to emulate right wing stupidities. I don&#039;t think Randi Rhodes should ever be forgiven for her insulting behavior towards Ralph Nader, harrassing him and not allowing him to express his opinions. Yes, talk radio needs to be lively, but no, it does not need to be abusive!

While I hope you are wrong about Obama getting the nomination (please, no, no, no!), calling someone such vicious names as she did towards Hillary Clinton is something she should have been fired over. I&#039;ve been on message boards where Ann Coulter has been called vicious sexist names; I hate Ann Coulter, but I don&#039;t believe in being misogynistic.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m glad Randi Rhodes is gone. I don&#8217;t want left leaning talk radio to emulate right wing stupidities. I don&#8217;t think Randi Rhodes should ever be forgiven for her insulting behavior towards Ralph Nader, harrassing him and not allowing him to express his opinions. Yes, talk radio needs to be lively, but no, it does not need to be abusive!</p>
<p>While I hope you are wrong about Obama getting the nomination (please, no, no, no!), calling someone such vicious names as she did towards Hillary Clinton is something she should have been fired over. I&#8217;ve been on message boards where Ann Coulter has been called vicious sexist names; I hate Ann Coulter, but I don&#8217;t believe in being misogynistic.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

