<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Buckley&#8217;s Big Mistake</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 10:46:58 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Dissident Voice : Another Bill O&#8217;Reilly SNAFU: Or, Why the Social Right Can&#8217;t Win the Vulgarity War</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-19359</link>
		<dc:creator>Dissident Voice : Another Bill O&#8217;Reilly SNAFU: Or, Why the Social Right Can&#8217;t Win the Vulgarity War</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 28 Apr 2008 12:01:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-19359</guid>
		<description>[...] the pertinent corporations are pro-profanity. It is an extension of the argument I made in &#8220;Buckley&#8217;s Big Mistake.&#8221; It is in the interest of the media to promote profanity. It is all part of the Darwinian [...]</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>[...] the pertinent corporations are pro-profanity. It is an extension of the argument I made in &#8220;Buckley&#8217;s Big Mistake.&#8221; It is in the interest of the media to promote profanity. It is all part of the Darwinian [...]</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15924</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 04:16:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15924</guid>
		<description>I was recently in Zagreb, the capital of Croatia, and visited the city museum there.  This city is now about half a million people, so not that big.  In the middle ages -- in the 1400s, 1500s, etc., it must have been much, much smaller.  Clearly, it wasn&#039;t a major European metropolis at the time.

At the museum, they have the names of the women of Zagreb that were punished as witches (burned at the stake) in that period.  The list contains SEVERAL HUNDRED names (I think about 500 or more).  Just in this one relatively small city.  Imagine all those women!  Just because somebody thought they acted strangely at some point?  Disposed of in a most horrible and horrifying way.  What were they thinking, how were they feeling as the flames were lapping at their feet and then wrapped around their bodies?  All alone.  They were somebody&#039;s daughter, sister, mother, wife.  And imagine this happening all over Europe, not just in this one small city.  Do the multiplication and see what the religion did.   And that&#039;s just one aspect of it.

And don&#039;t think this doesn&#039;t happen any more.  Do you think that shock and awe could have happened against a Christian country (that didn&#039;t start something horrible first like Germany did in WW2)?  And Americans will be pliable, if the churches tell them that something is necessary in God&#039;s name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I was recently in Zagreb, the capital of Croatia, and visited the city museum there.  This city is now about half a million people, so not that big.  In the middle ages &#8212; in the 1400s, 1500s, etc., it must have been much, much smaller.  Clearly, it wasn&#8217;t a major European metropolis at the time.</p>
<p>At the museum, they have the names of the women of Zagreb that were punished as witches (burned at the stake) in that period.  The list contains SEVERAL HUNDRED names (I think about 500 or more).  Just in this one relatively small city.  Imagine all those women!  Just because somebody thought they acted strangely at some point?  Disposed of in a most horrible and horrifying way.  What were they thinking, how were they feeling as the flames were lapping at their feet and then wrapped around their bodies?  All alone.  They were somebody&#8217;s daughter, sister, mother, wife.  And imagine this happening all over Europe, not just in this one small city.  Do the multiplication and see what the religion did.   And that&#8217;s just one aspect of it.</p>
<p>And don&#8217;t think this doesn&#8217;t happen any more.  Do you think that shock and awe could have happened against a Christian country (that didn&#8217;t start something horrible first like Germany did in WW2)?  And Americans will be pliable, if the churches tell them that something is necessary in God&#8217;s name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Wilkinson</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15922</link>
		<dc:creator>John Wilkinson</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 09 Mar 2008 03:42:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15922</guid>
		<description>I think it&#039;s much deeper than that.  Perhaps more and more people realize the gig is a scam.  And not just in America.  How could it possibly not be, when there is no checking of facts, no accountability (re tax free status, re clergy rape, re everything), everything&#039;s on blind faith, and if you dare say something you&#039;re insulting God.

They claim to be moral leaders (though, I really don&#039;t know why they should have a lock on morality).  But let&#039;s see what happens when their services are really needed.  Shock and awe was mentioned above.   But that&#039;s just one instance, there are many more.  For example, Balkans are now in the news, again.  I am from that area.  During WW2, when the Croats were commiting unspeakable atrocities against the Serbs, the catholic church in Croatia said nothing, not a peep; actually, they may have blessed the bloody deeds.  In the 90s, when the Serbs were committing unspeakable atrocities against the Croats and the Muslims, the Serbian orthodox church said nothing, not a peep; actually, some of them may have blessed the bloody deeds.  What happened in WW2 in Germany, did any of their priests raise a voice in defense of decency?  What about the pope, did he say anything?  So, they flee under a rock when it really counts.  Does anyone here preach about the plight of the Palestinians?  I know, there are some who help the poor, and some who even put their own lives/livelihoods on the line, etc., and that&#039;s admirable, but by and large they don&#039;t bother when it doesn&#039;t suit them.

Look at the pope telling the poor people in Latin America not to use contraception.  Well, that has real world devastating consequences, aggravating the already appalling poverty (and increasing the dependence on church, which is what they wanted).

The Europeans don&#039;t bother with these clowns.  Why?  Could it be they got smart after centuries of abuses (to put it mildly)?  After the crusades, the witch hunts, the inquisition, Giordano Bruno being burnt at the stake in 1600, Galileo forced to renounce his discoveries to avoid the same fate, students being dropped in boiling oil for possession of forbidden books, whole cities being burned, and on and on and on.  I think they FINALLY had enough.  Good for them.

But in America, adding insult to injury, not only do they willfully submit their minds to brainwashing, they are scammed doing it, easy millions made off of them.  What is the role of churches here?  To tell you not to rock the boat.  Be satisfied with your miserable station in life, don&#039;t seek change.  Everything is cool, God loves you.  And you&#039;ll be rewarded for your patience and for not rocking the boat;  you&#039;ll be rewarded later, much, much later.  Just -- to ensure that reward, do drop your contribution in the plate/mail.  In other words, the religion serves to enable the ripping off of the masses by the elites and the continuance of the status quo.  It works in tandem with the lack of proper education.  Who&#039;s gonna complain about their situation, if it means getting on the bad side of God?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think it&#8217;s much deeper than that.  Perhaps more and more people realize the gig is a scam.  And not just in America.  How could it possibly not be, when there is no checking of facts, no accountability (re tax free status, re clergy rape, re everything), everything&#8217;s on blind faith, and if you dare say something you&#8217;re insulting God.</p>
<p>They claim to be moral leaders (though, I really don&#8217;t know why they should have a lock on morality).  But let&#8217;s see what happens when their services are really needed.  Shock and awe was mentioned above.   But that&#8217;s just one instance, there are many more.  For example, Balkans are now in the news, again.  I am from that area.  During WW2, when the Croats were commiting unspeakable atrocities against the Serbs, the catholic church in Croatia said nothing, not a peep; actually, they may have blessed the bloody deeds.  In the 90s, when the Serbs were committing unspeakable atrocities against the Croats and the Muslims, the Serbian orthodox church said nothing, not a peep; actually, some of them may have blessed the bloody deeds.  What happened in WW2 in Germany, did any of their priests raise a voice in defense of decency?  What about the pope, did he say anything?  So, they flee under a rock when it really counts.  Does anyone here preach about the plight of the Palestinians?  I know, there are some who help the poor, and some who even put their own lives/livelihoods on the line, etc., and that&#8217;s admirable, but by and large they don&#8217;t bother when it doesn&#8217;t suit them.</p>
<p>Look at the pope telling the poor people in Latin America not to use contraception.  Well, that has real world devastating consequences, aggravating the already appalling poverty (and increasing the dependence on church, which is what they wanted).</p>
<p>The Europeans don&#8217;t bother with these clowns.  Why?  Could it be they got smart after centuries of abuses (to put it mildly)?  After the crusades, the witch hunts, the inquisition, Giordano Bruno being burnt at the stake in 1600, Galileo forced to renounce his discoveries to avoid the same fate, students being dropped in boiling oil for possession of forbidden books, whole cities being burned, and on and on and on.  I think they FINALLY had enough.  Good for them.</p>
<p>But in America, adding insult to injury, not only do they willfully submit their minds to brainwashing, they are scammed doing it, easy millions made off of them.  What is the role of churches here?  To tell you not to rock the boat.  Be satisfied with your miserable station in life, don&#8217;t seek change.  Everything is cool, God loves you.  And you&#8217;ll be rewarded for your patience and for not rocking the boat;  you&#8217;ll be rewarded later, much, much later.  Just &#8212; to ensure that reward, do drop your contribution in the plate/mail.  In other words, the religion serves to enable the ripping off of the masses by the elites and the continuance of the status quo.  It works in tandem with the lack of proper education.  Who&#8217;s gonna complain about their situation, if it means getting on the bad side of God?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Don</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15896</link>
		<dc:creator>Don</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 14:13:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15896</guid>
		<description>Wow!  So Mr. Buckley did all this?  
Although I agree with many things in the article, it does not even scratch the surface of what the true problems to the Christian faith are.
If I wanted to write for a couple of hours I could explain how feminism, abortion, contraception, pronography, and the high divorce rate are all linked to the decay of society and christianity.
Gregory Paul is far from genius.  Let&#039;s not give him too much credit.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Wow!  So Mr. Buckley did all this?<br />
Although I agree with many things in the article, it does not even scratch the surface of what the true problems to the Christian faith are.<br />
If I wanted to write for a couple of hours I could explain how feminism, abortion, contraception, pronography, and the high divorce rate are all linked to the decay of society and christianity.<br />
Gregory Paul is far from genius.  Let&#8217;s not give him too much credit.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: TC</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15883</link>
		<dc:creator>TC</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 08 Mar 2008 00:48:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15883</guid>
		<description>I wouldn&#039;t even say it&#039;s not that Buckley wasn&#039;t socially astute.  And this is a minor critique-this is a great piece which identifies what was absolutely the fulcrum on which the conservative movement headed into a death spiral-but Buckley&#039;s desire for power and his vision of the scale of the (admittedly fractured) Republican voting bloc overpowered his commitment to his religious outlook.  If he had truly been a conservative, the secondary temptation of secular power would not have outweighed the legitimacy of his religious outlook.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I wouldn&#8217;t even say it&#8217;s not that Buckley wasn&#8217;t socially astute.  And this is a minor critique-this is a great piece which identifies what was absolutely the fulcrum on which the conservative movement headed into a death spiral-but Buckley&#8217;s desire for power and his vision of the scale of the (admittedly fractured) Republican voting bloc overpowered his commitment to his religious outlook.  If he had truly been a conservative, the secondary temptation of secular power would not have outweighed the legitimacy of his religious outlook.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15872</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 21:29:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15872</guid>
		<description>Thanks right back at you Lloyd for the nice thoughts on my site...

A great article and a fantastic discussion. Glad I stumbled my way here in the first place! DV - you&#039;ve got a new fan...

Eric 
www.changeany1thing.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Thanks right back at you Lloyd for the nice thoughts on my site&#8230;</p>
<p>A great article and a fantastic discussion. Glad I stumbled my way here in the first place! DV &#8211; you&#8217;ve got a new fan&#8230;</p>
<p>Eric<br />
<a href="http://www.changeany1thing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.changeany1thing.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: MonkeyBoy</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15851</link>
		<dc:creator>MonkeyBoy</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 17:26:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15851</guid>
		<description>I think a large element missing in your analysis of the  alliance between the religious and the rich is communism.

Somehow the rich convinced the religious that anything less than free wheeling capitalism is a step toward communism and that communism by definition will persecute the religious.

One symbol of this is &quot;in God We Trust&quot;, which was placed on our units of capital in the 1950 as an explicit swipe at godless communism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I think a large element missing in your analysis of the  alliance between the religious and the rich is communism.</p>
<p>Somehow the rich convinced the religious that anything less than free wheeling capitalism is a step toward communism and that communism by definition will persecute the religious.</p>
<p>One symbol of this is &#8220;in God We Trust&#8221;, which was placed on our units of capital in the 1950 as an explicit swipe at godless communism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15833</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 14:25:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15833</guid>
		<description>I&#039;m SO glad I laid off a day and then CHECKED BACK!!  Thank you, Eric, for the Bingo-Bango.  The web site you link us to is yours?  Well, whose-ever&#039;s, it&#039;s substantively solid and has a hoot for a title (&quot;change for crying out loud Anything!&quot;).

And thank you,  Jeremy.  The lead piece by Patrick Martin is the best, most thoughtful, and analytical dissection of  The Buckley I&#039;ve read to date.  Of course, the wsws has had the luxury of polishing its gemlike obit for forty years.   :-)</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;m SO glad I laid off a day and then CHECKED BACK!!  Thank you, Eric, for the Bingo-Bango.  The web site you link us to is yours?  Well, whose-ever&#8217;s, it&#8217;s substantively solid and has a hoot for a title (&#8221;change for crying out loud Anything!&#8221;).</p>
<p>And thank you,  Jeremy.  The lead piece by Patrick Martin is the best, most thoughtful, and analytical dissection of  The Buckley I&#8217;ve read to date.  Of course, the wsws has had the luxury of polishing its gemlike obit for forty years.   :-)</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Jeremy Wells</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15823</link>
		<dc:creator>Jeremy Wells</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 05:25:19 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15823</guid>
		<description>Here is link to WSWS story, with interesting background information:

William F. Buckley, longtime propagandist for US ultra-right, dies at 82
By Patrick Martin
5 March 2008

http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/mar2008/buck-m05.shtml

For some 30 years, from the founding of National Review in 1955 to the rise of right-wing talk radio in the 1980s, Buckley was the most prominent advocate for what would become the dominant position within the American ruling class: opposition to any government effort to alleviate social distress; hostility to popular movements of the oppressed, whether in the United States or internationally; and a repudiation of the compromises made on both these fronts by the New Deal of the 1930s.

&quot;Buckley was put in a position to play this role because of his family’s wealth and connections. His father, William F. Buckley, Sr., was a wealthy oilman with holdings in Mexico and Venezuela, who reportedly played a role in financing the Cristero rebellion in Mexico—a right-wing, Catholic Church-inspired revolt in reaction to the Mexican Revolution of 1911-1919.&quot;

...</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here is link to WSWS story, with interesting background information:</p>
<p>William F. Buckley, longtime propagandist for US ultra-right, dies at 82<br />
By Patrick Martin<br />
5 March 2008</p>
<p><a href="http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/mar2008/buck-m05.shtml" rel="nofollow">http://www.wsws.org/articles/2008/mar2008/buck-m05.shtml</a></p>
<p>For some 30 years, from the founding of National Review in 1955 to the rise of right-wing talk radio in the 1980s, Buckley was the most prominent advocate for what would become the dominant position within the American ruling class: opposition to any government effort to alleviate social distress; hostility to popular movements of the oppressed, whether in the United States or internationally; and a repudiation of the compromises made on both these fronts by the New Deal of the 1930s.</p>
<p>&#8220;Buckley was put in a position to play this role because of his family’s wealth and connections. His father, William F. Buckley, Sr., was a wealthy oilman with holdings in Mexico and Venezuela, who reportedly played a role in financing the Cristero rebellion in Mexico—a right-wing, Catholic Church-inspired revolt in reaction to the Mexican Revolution of 1911-1919.&#8221;</p>
<p>&#8230;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: AaronG</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15811</link>
		<dc:creator>AaronG</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 07 Mar 2008 01:33:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15811</guid>
		<description>Good comment by DavidG above.......

Yes, like any document, scripture CAN be interpreted wrongly or out of context if one has the wrong motive  (eg lust for power, greed, justification for genocide or justification for the clergy preying on their young flock) . But the whole document, the Bible, has a theme which cannot be denied when read from cover to cover. That theme is the vindication of God&#039;s Kingdom and the judgment (and eventual destruction) of greedy human rulership structures.
 
I think we should all stop being disappointed with Big Religion&#039;s behaviour, as if they are the rightful guardians of religious truth. They don&#039;t represent the Bible any more than Bush does. It would take me 10 minutes of explanation to my 3yo daughter for her to understand the hypocrisy behind their actions, compared to their speech. Even she would understand, after showing her Jesus&#039; words to &quot;love your neighbour&quot; and &quot;do not be part of the world&quot;, that these guys are not living by those simple principles and that they are a scam. They have a Religion Pty Ltd, but they do not have  a faith. She would be old enough soon to see the difference. She would soon understand that there is no difference between Big Religion (with Santa Claus) and Big Business (with Ronald McDonald). They both have a CEO, CFO, Managing Director and shareholders.....and a horde of consumers who blindly keep putting cash onto the collection plate. In actual fact, my daughter, with a few more years of understanding, would then be able to see that Big Religion actually has an advantage over Big Business. This advantage is not insignificant. It hits us every time we collect our pay packet. It hits Big Business to such an extent that they try to dodge it any which (illegal) way they can.............it&#039;s called TAX. Yes, this global scam is not only ripping us off and killing us, it&#039;s doing it free of tax. For anyone who owns a small business (or is on salary like me)  just think about that advantage for a second. We start working for ourselves from about some time on Tuesday afternoon or Wednesday. Big Religion starts counting their cash from about Monday morning 6am! Mmmmmm, tax free, what a business.

So I think we should stop being shocked by their actions, their political alliances, their scams, their involvement in wars, their lack of real faith. It&#039;s time to see through their hypocrisy. The Creator has........

The Bible forecasted Big Religion&#039;s demise/destruction along with Big Business and Big Politics. Even though these verses quoted below are taken individually, with no room here for explanation of context, background etc, I think you&#039;ll agree that there&#039;s not much room for  misinterpretation of them (unless you&#039;re heavily involved in ripping off churchgoers with your &quot;Prosperity Preaching&quot; doctrine, or have your religious tentacles deep into the hallways of Washington/Whitehall):

&quot;Not everyone saying to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the kingdom of the heavens, but the one doing the will of my Father who is in the heavens will.&quot; - Matt 7:21 

Jesus answered: “My kingdom is no part of this world.&quot; - John 18:36

[Referring to what the Bible calls &quot;Babylon the Great&quot;, or Big Religion] And I heard another voice out of heaven say: “Get out of her, my people, if you do not want to share with her in her sins, and if you do not want to receive part of her plagues.  For her sins have massed together clear up to heaven, and God has called her acts of injustice to mind.&quot; - Rev 18:4,5

Thanks for the article, Gregory.

AG</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Good comment by DavidG above&#8230;&#8230;.</p>
<p>Yes, like any document, scripture CAN be interpreted wrongly or out of context if one has the wrong motive  (eg lust for power, greed, justification for genocide or justification for the clergy preying on their young flock) . But the whole document, the Bible, has a theme which cannot be denied when read from cover to cover. That theme is the vindication of God&#8217;s Kingdom and the judgment (and eventual destruction) of greedy human rulership structures.</p>
<p>I think we should all stop being disappointed with Big Religion&#8217;s behaviour, as if they are the rightful guardians of religious truth. They don&#8217;t represent the Bible any more than Bush does. It would take me 10 minutes of explanation to my 3yo daughter for her to understand the hypocrisy behind their actions, compared to their speech. Even she would understand, after showing her Jesus&#8217; words to &#8220;love your neighbour&#8221; and &#8220;do not be part of the world&#8221;, that these guys are not living by those simple principles and that they are a scam. They have a Religion Pty Ltd, but they do not have  a faith. She would be old enough soon to see the difference. She would soon understand that there is no difference between Big Religion (with Santa Claus) and Big Business (with Ronald McDonald). They both have a CEO, CFO, Managing Director and shareholders&#8230;..and a horde of consumers who blindly keep putting cash onto the collection plate. In actual fact, my daughter, with a few more years of understanding, would then be able to see that Big Religion actually has an advantage over Big Business. This advantage is not insignificant. It hits us every time we collect our pay packet. It hits Big Business to such an extent that they try to dodge it any which (illegal) way they can&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;&#8230;.it&#8217;s called TAX. Yes, this global scam is not only ripping us off and killing us, it&#8217;s doing it free of tax. For anyone who owns a small business (or is on salary like me)  just think about that advantage for a second. We start working for ourselves from about some time on Tuesday afternoon or Wednesday. Big Religion starts counting their cash from about Monday morning 6am! Mmmmmm, tax free, what a business.</p>
<p>So I think we should stop being shocked by their actions, their political alliances, their scams, their involvement in wars, their lack of real faith. It&#8217;s time to see through their hypocrisy. The Creator has&#8230;&#8230;..</p>
<p>The Bible forecasted Big Religion&#8217;s demise/destruction along with Big Business and Big Politics. Even though these verses quoted below are taken individually, with no room here for explanation of context, background etc, I think you&#8217;ll agree that there&#8217;s not much room for  misinterpretation of them (unless you&#8217;re heavily involved in ripping off churchgoers with your &#8220;Prosperity Preaching&#8221; doctrine, or have your religious tentacles deep into the hallways of Washington/Whitehall):</p>
<p>&#8220;Not everyone saying to me, ‘Lord, Lord,’ will enter into the kingdom of the heavens, but the one doing the will of my Father who is in the heavens will.&#8221; &#8211; Matt 7:21 </p>
<p>Jesus answered: “My kingdom is no part of this world.&#8221; &#8211; John 18:36</p>
<p>[Referring to what the Bible calls "Babylon the Great", or Big Religion] And I heard another voice out of heaven say: “Get out of her, my people, if you do not want to share with her in her sins, and if you do not want to receive part of her plagues.  For her sins have massed together clear up to heaven, and God has called her acts of injustice to mind.&#8221; &#8211; Rev 18:4,5</p>
<p>Thanks for the article, Gregory.</p>
<p>AG</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15805</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 22:44:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15805</guid>
		<description>Bingo. This is such a critical concept and you have articulated the motivation behind 50 years of American Conservatism beautifully. 
	
I mean, here&#039;s a so-called Christian movement that stays silent for &quot;Shock and Awe&quot;, torture and illegal war; pursues social programs that target  - rather than assist - the poor; and advocates for the most lethal military buildup in human history.   It&#039;s like they decided to cherry-pick their way through scripture, conveniently skipping the The Beatitudes, for instance. The next time anyone wonders why I will send them to this URL. And then I&#039;ll add &quot;just follow the money&quot;. 

Nicely done. 

Eric
www.changeany1thing.com</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Bingo. This is such a critical concept and you have articulated the motivation behind 50 years of American Conservatism beautifully. </p>
<p>I mean, here&#8217;s a so-called Christian movement that stays silent for &#8220;Shock and Awe&#8221;, torture and illegal war; pursues social programs that target  &#8211; rather than assist &#8211; the poor; and advocates for the most lethal military buildup in human history.   It&#8217;s like they decided to cherry-pick their way through scripture, conveniently skipping the The Beatitudes, for instance. The next time anyone wonders why I will send them to this URL. And then I&#8217;ll add &#8220;just follow the money&#8221;. </p>
<p>Nicely done. </p>
<p>Eric<br />
<a href="http://www.changeany1thing.com" rel="nofollow">http://www.changeany1thing.com</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Arch Stanton</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15799</link>
		<dc:creator>Arch Stanton</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 20:54:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15799</guid>
		<description>http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Supply-side_Jesus</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><a href="http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Supply-side_Jesus" rel="nofollow">http://uncyclopedia.org/wiki/Supply-side_Jesus</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15761</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 04:41:13 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15761</guid>
		<description>Well said, HR.   

And thank you for this article, GP.  It summarizes and says a great deal about The 20th Century&#039;s Greatest Tele-Evangelist.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Well said, HR.   </p>
<p>And thank you for this article, GP.  It summarizes and says a great deal about The 20th Century&#8217;s Greatest Tele-Evangelist.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15758</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 04:11:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15758</guid>
		<description>For those with an interest in the 17th century and Weber&#039;s famous thesis, I recommend (again, as in a post to another DV article several weeks ago) the ground-breaking 45-page essay in HR Trevor-Roper&#039;s &quot;The Crisis of the Seventeenth Century&quot; (Harper &amp; Row, 1956) by the title of &quot;Religion, the Reformation and Social Change.&quot;  After actually tracing families -- ie, naming names -- of persecuted and displaced, incredibly successful capitalists, including Jews, and Catholics in addition to Protestants, T-R concludes it was persecution that drove the capitalist process in the 17th century rather than a spirit specific to Protestantism.  

This interpretation, &quot;liberal&quot; or even &quot;conservative&quot; as it seems to radicals or progressives, is less unpalatable to those with more radical political sympathies.   But for whatever reason, T-R is well remembered for &quot;The Last Days of Hitler&quot; but this landmark of intellectual history is largely forgotten and, evidently, widely ignored in social science curriculums today.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>For those with an interest in the 17th century and Weber&#8217;s famous thesis, I recommend (again, as in a post to another DV article several weeks ago) the ground-breaking 45-page essay in HR Trevor-Roper&#8217;s &#8220;The Crisis of the Seventeenth Century&#8221; (Harper &amp; Row, 1956) by the title of &#8220;Religion, the Reformation and Social Change.&#8221;  After actually tracing families &#8212; ie, naming names &#8212; of persecuted and displaced, incredibly successful capitalists, including Jews, and Catholics in addition to Protestants, T-R concludes it was persecution that drove the capitalist process in the 17th century rather than a spirit specific to Protestantism.  </p>
<p>This interpretation, &#8220;liberal&#8221; or even &#8220;conservative&#8221; as it seems to radicals or progressives, is less unpalatable to those with more radical political sympathies.   But for whatever reason, T-R is well remembered for &#8220;The Last Days of Hitler&#8221; but this landmark of intellectual history is largely forgotten and, evidently, widely ignored in social science curriculums today.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: HR</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15748</link>
		<dc:creator>HR</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Mar 2008 01:14:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15748</guid>
		<description>As I recall, the Calvinists (Puritans), who share many traits with &quot;modern&quot; evangelicals, including a strong tendency to authoritarianism, had no problem with capitalism, or at least with people getting filthy rich, long before WWII.  Seems to me they figured rich people were more likely to be among the preordained chosen based on how god had smiled on them during their earthly existence.  As one raised in the cult of Southern Baptism, I find this article a little off base in places.  And, I believe it gives far too much credit to Buckley, who was for the most part no more than a slightly entertaining monster, even in his heyday.  Kind of sad to see the left laud the jerk so much.  He really wasn&#039;t worth the waste of all the words said about him following his one decent action:  dying.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>As I recall, the Calvinists (Puritans), who share many traits with &#8220;modern&#8221; evangelicals, including a strong tendency to authoritarianism, had no problem with capitalism, or at least with people getting filthy rich, long before WWII.  Seems to me they figured rich people were more likely to be among the preordained chosen based on how god had smiled on them during their earthly existence.  As one raised in the cult of Southern Baptism, I find this article a little off base in places.  And, I believe it gives far too much credit to Buckley, who was for the most part no more than a slightly entertaining monster, even in his heyday.  Kind of sad to see the left laud the jerk so much.  He really wasn&#8217;t worth the waste of all the words said about him following his one decent action:  dying.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: DavidG.</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15738</link>
		<dc:creator>DavidG.</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 23:37:27 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15738</guid>
		<description>The Christian church (according to the Gospels) and Capitalism should be diametrically opposed.  Yet they coexist quite happily!

It&#039;s amazing, the way the scriptures can be interpreted, how flexible its meanings are when there&#039;s money to be made and religious empires to be built!

Jesus, were he to return, would be disgusted at what has occurred in his name.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Christian church (according to the Gospels) and Capitalism should be diametrically opposed.  Yet they coexist quite happily!</p>
<p>It&#8217;s amazing, the way the scriptures can be interpreted, how flexible its meanings are when there&#8217;s money to be made and religious empires to be built!</p>
<p>Jesus, were he to return, would be disgusted at what has occurred in his name.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15727</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 20:10:01 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15727</guid>
		<description>No, it was Gore&#039;s big mistake not to have dragged Norman Mailer to boxing-match session with Lord Buckley. 

And for readers who think Norman was never a socialist, there&#039;s his almost vanished second book, Barbary Shore.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>No, it was Gore&#8217;s big mistake not to have dragged Norman Mailer to boxing-match session with Lord Buckley. </p>
<p>And for readers who think Norman was never a socialist, there&#8217;s his almost vanished second book, Barbary Shore.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: hp</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15713</link>
		<dc:creator>hp</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 19:33:15 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15713</guid>
		<description>Buckley&#039;s betrayal of Joe Sobran spoke volumes. &quot;For fear of the Jews.&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Buckley&#8217;s betrayal of Joe Sobran spoke volumes. &#8220;For fear of the Jews.&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kenny</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15709</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:57:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15709</guid>
		<description>A few small points of terminology. &quot;Traditionalist&quot; has a very special meaning in the Catholic Church, i.e. the Latin Mass crowd, with the Society of St. Pius X being the most extreme, and still not reconciled to Rome. Buckley was never a traditionalist. I always regarded him and such other NR Catholics as he hadn&#039;t dismissed, as turncoat Catholics, who had sold the Church out to the Evangelicals and the Jews.

Also the &quot;Bible&quot; was not written by Bronze and Iron Age peoples, the Old Testament (i.e. the &quot;Jewish Bible&quot; as we called it) was. Catholics, other than theologians, pay little enough to the Bible anyway but they pay hardly any to the Old Testamant. I learned most of what I know about Moses from watching Charlton Heston portray him!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>A few small points of terminology. &#8220;Traditionalist&#8221; has a very special meaning in the Catholic Church, i.e. the Latin Mass crowd, with the Society of St. Pius X being the most extreme, and still not reconciled to Rome. Buckley was never a traditionalist. I always regarded him and such other NR Catholics as he hadn&#8217;t dismissed, as turncoat Catholics, who had sold the Church out to the Evangelicals and the Jews.</p>
<p>Also the &#8220;Bible&#8221; was not written by Bronze and Iron Age peoples, the Old Testament (i.e. the &#8220;Jewish Bible&#8221; as we called it) was. Catholics, other than theologians, pay little enough to the Bible anyway but they pay hardly any to the Old Testamant. I learned most of what I know about Moses from watching Charlton Heston portray him!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hatuxka</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15707</link>
		<dc:creator>Hatuxka</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 05 Mar 2008 16:41:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/03/buckleys-big-mistake/#comment-15707</guid>
		<description>Beautiful article, the two pedantic, pedagogic responses above nothwithstanding.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Beautiful article, the two pedantic, pedagogic responses above nothwithstanding.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
