<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: White Boys and Barack Obama</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Nick</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-32171</link>
		<dc:creator>Nick</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 18 Nov 2008 15:37:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-32171</guid>
		<description>Here lies the Eagle, almost gone, nothing left but skin and bone.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Here lies the Eagle, almost gone, nothing left but skin and bone.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15043</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:44:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15043</guid>
		<description>It&#039;s not over, Tom Joad.  It&#039;s not over.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>It&#8217;s not over, Tom Joad.  It&#8217;s not over.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15041</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 18:32:45 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15041</guid>
		<description>OKAY!!   Heinie.

D&#039;ya know?  I&#039;m beginning to perceive a disconnect btw the person I&#039;ve spoken to on the phone and the person who puts up articles at Dissident Voice.

No shit,  Glen?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>OKAY!!   Heinie.</p>
<p>D&#8217;ya know?  I&#8217;m beginning to perceive a disconnect btw the person I&#8217;ve spoken to on the phone and the person who puts up articles at Dissident Voice.</p>
<p>No shit,  Glen?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15037</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:18:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15037</guid>
		<description>C&#039;mon, Glen!!  Have that second cup of Java and GET YOUR HINNIE IN HERE!!!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>C&#8217;mon, Glen!!  Have that second cup of Java and GET YOUR HINNIE IN HERE!!!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15035</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:16:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15035</guid>
		<description>I don&#039;t know about &quot;careful&quot; as a watchword (anyway), Shabnam.  Maybe it was just a relic of the sixties, but I was the men&#039;s-room-walls poet who kept posting &quot;Expose Thyself&quot; in the SF Bay Area.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t know about &#8220;careful&#8221; as a watchword (anyway), Shabnam.  Maybe it was just a relic of the sixties, but I was the men&#8217;s-room-walls poet who kept posting &#8220;Expose Thyself&#8221; in the SF Bay Area.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Shabnam</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15030</link>
		<dc:creator>Shabnam</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 17:01:16 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15030</guid>
		<description>The Zionist plan is to let McCain into the white house.  To do so, New York Times have already invited the Neocon, William Kristol, to join David Brooks and others to implement this plan through campaign of lies and deceptions.  NYT supports McCain for Republicans and Obama for Democrats.  The real candidate is the warmonger McCain.  They think Obama against McCain, as African American has a better chance to beat Obama.   I’m sure there is going to be a TERRPROST plan ready to be exploded in the end of the summer by the imperialist/Zionist forces in the US or somewhere else in their colonies to take ignorant and arrogant Americans hostage AGAIN to finalize their plan and fix the election rhetoric on “TERRORISM” of their own act and frighten the ignorant population.  They did the same in Spain few years ago but had a reverse effect.  That was, however, a different population.
Since no one can be elected president without the “Jewish lobby” green light, therefore, Obama has gone extra miles to get AIPAC approval.  None of the Obama support statements for Israel has convinced Zionists that he is their man, that he too, just like Senator Clinton, who has repeatedly said: “Israeli values are American values,” when Israel was bombing Lebanon and killing more than a thousand Lebanese civilians including children.
Zionists have published an essay, “Barack Obama and Israel” in “American Thinker” and have dismissed Obama as a man for Israel.  In this essay Lasky accused Obama of concealing his affiliation with a church that is in fact “Afro-centric” in its Christianity, accusing Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Jr., the Pastor of the Church as a man with a militant past and that’s why Obama has distance himself publicly from Wright.  He has done everything to satisfy the main actors of American election, the Jewish Lobby, yet they prefer the warmonger McCain.
New York Times purposely published the story behind the “romantic relationship with that woman” after they were confident that McCain is the republicans nominee for 2008.  NYT had this information for a long time but they have decided to reveal it at this time since benefits their candidate.  There is going to be “talking” around this issue, therefore, they sell more newspapers and then the news will die out soon enough to be prepared for the main show. Therefore, no one can use this piece of information later around the election week, in the November, anymore.   As professor Dabashi, has written: 

“IT IS OF COURSE ultimately unfair to laser-beam on Senator Obama a calamity that has long plagued American political culture. Over the last half a century, American foreign policy is held hostage (as John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt have extensively demonstrated) to a single-minded commitment to the Jewish apartheid state, which has in turn degenerated its own political culture to that of Christian imperialism. The US is narratively trapped inside a single-minded commitment to the Jewish state, which now amounts to the worst common denominator of American political culture, and as such it will pull down any sign of hope that may aspire to transform this catastrophe to become the promise that it has always been -- a beacon of hope for the world.”
People must be careful and expose the Zionist/imperialist camp especially  those  “left” who is directed by the hidden Zionists in the US and elsewhere.
http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2008/885/op111.htm</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The Zionist plan is to let McCain into the white house.  To do so, New York Times have already invited the Neocon, William Kristol, to join David Brooks and others to implement this plan through campaign of lies and deceptions.  NYT supports McCain for Republicans and Obama for Democrats.  The real candidate is the warmonger McCain.  They think Obama against McCain, as African American has a better chance to beat Obama.   I’m sure there is going to be a TERRPROST plan ready to be exploded in the end of the summer by the imperialist/Zionist forces in the US or somewhere else in their colonies to take ignorant and arrogant Americans hostage AGAIN to finalize their plan and fix the election rhetoric on “TERRORISM” of their own act and frighten the ignorant population.  They did the same in Spain few years ago but had a reverse effect.  That was, however, a different population.<br />
Since no one can be elected president without the “Jewish lobby” green light, therefore, Obama has gone extra miles to get AIPAC approval.  None of the Obama support statements for Israel has convinced Zionists that he is their man, that he too, just like Senator Clinton, who has repeatedly said: “Israeli values are American values,” when Israel was bombing Lebanon and killing more than a thousand Lebanese civilians including children.<br />
Zionists have published an essay, “Barack Obama and Israel” in “American Thinker” and have dismissed Obama as a man for Israel.  In this essay Lasky accused Obama of concealing his affiliation with a church that is in fact “Afro-centric” in its Christianity, accusing Reverend Jeremiah Wright, Jr., the Pastor of the Church as a man with a militant past and that’s why Obama has distance himself publicly from Wright.  He has done everything to satisfy the main actors of American election, the Jewish Lobby, yet they prefer the warmonger McCain.<br />
New York Times purposely published the story behind the “romantic relationship with that woman” after they were confident that McCain is the republicans nominee for 2008.  NYT had this information for a long time but they have decided to reveal it at this time since benefits their candidate.  There is going to be “talking” around this issue, therefore, they sell more newspapers and then the news will die out soon enough to be prepared for the main show. Therefore, no one can use this piece of information later around the election week, in the November, anymore.   As professor Dabashi, has written: </p>
<p>“IT IS OF COURSE ultimately unfair to laser-beam on Senator Obama a calamity that has long plagued American political culture. Over the last half a century, American foreign policy is held hostage (as John Mearsheimer and Stephen Walt have extensively demonstrated) to a single-minded commitment to the Jewish apartheid state, which has in turn degenerated its own political culture to that of Christian imperialism. The US is narratively trapped inside a single-minded commitment to the Jewish state, which now amounts to the worst common denominator of American political culture, and as such it will pull down any sign of hope that may aspire to transform this catastrophe to become the promise that it has always been &#8212; a beacon of hope for the world.”<br />
People must be careful and expose the Zionist/imperialist camp especially  those  “left” who is directed by the hidden Zionists in the US and elsewhere.<br />
<a href="http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2008/885/op111.htm" rel="nofollow">http://weekly.ahram.org.eg/2008/885/op111.htm</a></p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15016</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 14:26:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15016</guid>
		<description>Btw Marcelle&#039;s and John Hatch&#039;s, falls the shadow.

Something must be done, but the doing lets loose even bigger dogs.

So who you gonna call?

Ghostbusters?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Btw Marcelle&#8217;s and John Hatch&#8217;s, falls the shadow.</p>
<p>Something must be done, but the doing lets loose even bigger dogs.</p>
<p>So who you gonna call?</p>
<p>Ghostbusters?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mark Slaugh</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15013</link>
		<dc:creator>Mark Slaugh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 13:34:50 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-15013</guid>
		<description>The difference between Clinton &amp; Obama?  Obama can win.  The right has found itself on the receiving end of &quot;shock and awe&quot;.  They were all loaded for Hillary, and the Senator from Illinois has   left their collective heads spinning. 

John Hatch - I hope and pray,  for the sake of our country and world that you are wrong...but I&#039;ve lived to to long and seen to much, to scoff at your cynicism.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The difference between Clinton &amp; Obama?  Obama can win.  The right has found itself on the receiving end of &#8220;shock and awe&#8221;.  They were all loaded for Hillary, and the Senator from Illinois has   left their collective heads spinning. </p>
<p>John Hatch &#8211; I hope and pray,  for the sake of our country and world that you are wrong&#8230;but I&#8217;ve lived to to long and seen to much, to scoff at your cynicism.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: John Hatch</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14990</link>
		<dc:creator>John Hatch</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sat, 23 Feb 2008 02:02:00 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14990</guid>
		<description>How&#039;s this for cynical? Whatever his merits, Mr. Obama will not become President, because Bush/Cheney have no intention of leaving office even if there&#039;s a 1% chance of their being held accountable for their vile crimes.

Therefore they&#039;ll need a &#039;New Pearl Harbor Event&#039; in order to suspend whatever shreds of the Constitution are left, to declare martial law and start filling those brand new Halliburton concentration camps.

Eliminating Mr. Obama with the help of a Muslim patsy would serve the purpose. Mission accomplished without having to kill another 3000 people. 

Mr. Obama was left unprotected by Dallas police in what they said was a &#039;mistake&#039;. Watch for another mistake, but not for awhile.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>How&#8217;s this for cynical? Whatever his merits, Mr. Obama will not become President, because Bush/Cheney have no intention of leaving office even if there&#8217;s a 1% chance of their being held accountable for their vile crimes.</p>
<p>Therefore they&#8217;ll need a &#8216;New Pearl Harbor Event&#8217; in order to suspend whatever shreds of the Constitution are left, to declare martial law and start filling those brand new Halliburton concentration camps.</p>
<p>Eliminating Mr. Obama with the help of a Muslim patsy would serve the purpose. Mission accomplished without having to kill another 3000 people. </p>
<p>Mr. Obama was left unprotected by Dallas police in what they said was a &#8216;mistake&#8217;. Watch for another mistake, but not for awhile.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan e</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14980</link>
		<dc:creator>dan e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:57:36 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14980</guid>
		<description>After rereading &quot;Tomjoad&quot;s comments I realize the poster could not possibly be Jim Harris, who may/may not be the charpest cuchillo in the dror but is not capable of the kind of idiot-drool posted above.

Kim, I suggest you make this person choose another handle, since &quot;tomjoad&quot; is so closely identified with Jim Harris? 

Thanks,
Dan</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>After rereading &#8220;Tomjoad&#8221;s comments I realize the poster could not possibly be Jim Harris, who may/may not be the charpest cuchillo in the dror but is not capable of the kind of idiot-drool posted above.</p>
<p>Kim, I suggest you make this person choose another handle, since &#8220;tomjoad&#8221; is so closely identified with Jim Harris? </p>
<p>Thanks,<br />
Dan</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan e</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14979</link>
		<dc:creator>dan e</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 23:25:59 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14979</guid>
		<description>&quot;Tom Joad&quot;? 

tomjoad.org is the URL of a webpage maintained by Jim Harris of Berkeley, NorCal ISM &amp; other organizations. Also his email domain name, as in &quot;casey@tomjoad.org&quot;. 

So I&#039;m wondering: is this the real Jim Harris doing a lil trolling on the side? Seems unlikely, far as I know he stays pretty busy. Or is this somebody who saw the same movie &amp; also likes the character enough to adopt it as his identity?

Or is this possibly the same miscreant who caused all the confusion by appropriating one of Jim H&#039;s email addresses to post some destructive bs on Indybay? 

I&#039;m not jumping to any conclusions, but I would like to know that the &quot;comments&quot; above come from a real person &amp; not from some provocateur phony. 

If the poster is indeed Jim Harris, I apologize again for all the confusion. Btw, there are several other Jim Harrises in  my Address Book, one being the popular multi-style multi-instrumentalist/vocalist based here in Sac, who I&#039;ll have on the stand with me at my next paying gig. If I ever get another paying gig:) 

Pray for me,

Dan E</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>&#8220;Tom Joad&#8221;? </p>
<p>tomjoad.org is the URL of a webpage maintained by Jim Harris of Berkeley, NorCal ISM &amp; other organizations. Also his email domain name, as in &#8220;<span class="oe_textdirection">&#x67;&#x72;&#x6f;&#x2e;&#x64;&#x61;&#x6f;&#x6a;&#x6d;&#x6f;&#x74;<span class="oe_displaynone">null</span>&#x40;&#x79;&#x65;&#x73;&#x61;&#x63;</span>&#8221;. </p>
<p>So I&#8217;m wondering: is this the real Jim Harris doing a lil trolling on the side? Seems unlikely, far as I know he stays pretty busy. Or is this somebody who saw the same movie &amp; also likes the character enough to adopt it as his identity?</p>
<p>Or is this possibly the same miscreant who caused all the confusion by appropriating one of Jim H&#8217;s email addresses to post some destructive bs on Indybay? </p>
<p>I&#8217;m not jumping to any conclusions, but I would like to know that the &#8220;comments&#8221; above come from a real person &amp; not from some provocateur phony. </p>
<p>If the poster is indeed Jim Harris, I apologize again for all the confusion. Btw, there are several other Jim Harrises in  my Address Book, one being the popular multi-style multi-instrumentalist/vocalist based here in Sac, who I&#8217;ll have on the stand with me at my next paying gig. If I ever get another paying gig:) </p>
<p>Pray for me,</p>
<p>Dan E</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: semi-detached</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14958</link>
		<dc:creator>semi-detached</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 19:19:38 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14958</guid>
		<description>Existential propositions. Although one could argue that for any part, anyone who believes Obama&#039;s verbal coinage should constitute change is easily lead like lemmings to water. Of course you could speak your record and show the meaning of truth, as only one candidate has done, and have all of the modern establishment against you. Thereby inciting a revolution, and bringing to light the elite&#039;s mockery of freedom, or sit idly by and allow the brainwashing to continue for you and your family. I prefer the former- &quot;government has nothing to give someone that it has not taken from someone else.&quot;- Henry Hazlit</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Existential propositions. Although one could argue that for any part, anyone who believes Obama&#8217;s verbal coinage should constitute change is easily lead like lemmings to water. Of course you could speak your record and show the meaning of truth, as only one candidate has done, and have all of the modern establishment against you. Thereby inciting a revolution, and bringing to light the elite&#8217;s mockery of freedom, or sit idly by and allow the brainwashing to continue for you and your family. I prefer the former- &#8220;government has nothing to give someone that it has not taken from someone else.&#8221;- Henry Hazlit</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcelle Cendrars</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14938</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcelle Cendrars</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:57:20 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14938</guid>
		<description>Obama is no more Black than Clinton is Woman. They are both White Males...as per what the historical record shows is required to inhabit the White House. It is shameful that so many &quot;dissident voices&quot; join in such &quot;debates&quot; like what you have here. 

Nothing has been learned. For anyone to be harboring notions that &quot;once in office&quot; this or that will be significantly different is...beyond words. The fact that not only have major names on The Left embraced Obama...and major alternative outlets posted their cheerleading...is heartbreaking.

The &quot;No Difference&quot; cry is an excellent point of departure...for ending such &quot;discussions&quot; as this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Obama is no more Black than Clinton is Woman. They are both White Males&#8230;as per what the historical record shows is required to inhabit the White House. It is shameful that so many &#8220;dissident voices&#8221; join in such &#8220;debates&#8221; like what you have here. </p>
<p>Nothing has been learned. For anyone to be harboring notions that &#8220;once in office&#8221; this or that will be significantly different is&#8230;beyond words. The fact that not only have major names on The Left embraced Obama&#8230;and major alternative outlets posted their cheerleading&#8230;is heartbreaking.</p>
<p>The &#8220;No Difference&#8221; cry is an excellent point of departure&#8230;for ending such &#8220;discussions&#8221; as this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Hue Longer</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14936</link>
		<dc:creator>Hue Longer</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 06:05:39 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14936</guid>
		<description>E.Bills,

The aspect of the &quot;Hip Hop Movement&quot; I assume you think Glen should take on receives its prevalence and relevance thanks to a bunch of white men.  Why don&#039;t you then take it on?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>E.Bills,</p>
<p>The aspect of the &#8220;Hip Hop Movement&#8221; I assume you think Glen should take on receives its prevalence and relevance thanks to a bunch of white men.  Why don&#8217;t you then take it on?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shields</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14932</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 02:36:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14932</guid>
		<description>The bottom line - after listening to Obama and Hillary - ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE (other than color and gender). ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE. 

With Kucinich and Edwards out of the race no straight talk AT ALL.

Listen - Glen has the pulse on this.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>The bottom line &#8211; after listening to Obama and Hillary &#8211; ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE (other than color and gender). ABSOLUTELY NO DIFFERENCE. </p>
<p>With Kucinich and Edwards out of the race no straight talk AT ALL.</p>
<p>Listen &#8211; Glen has the pulse on this.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Frank Bubo</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14927</link>
		<dc:creator>Frank Bubo</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 01:24:43 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14927</guid>
		<description>Last time I checked, Barack Obama was a mulatto.  His is just as much white as he is black.  To look at him in media views, I would guess that he dances more like a white man than a black man.  He doesn&#039;t seem to have any soul or any funk, though when he wants to put on the &quot;black preacher&quot; persona, he can do the end of sentence inflections that make him seem a little bit like a cross between Martin Luther King and Jimmy Swaggart.

Obama is loved by white folk because he is perceived as totally non-threatening.  He is skinny like J.J. of &quot;What&#039;s Happening?&quot;  He is a schmoozer like Will Smith.  He fits in with the cops more than with the Crips.  He would be far more at home with Martha Stewart than with Angela Davis.

The change proposed by Obama is more superficial than substantial.  He talks the talk, but there is reason to believe he walks the walk.  I don&#039;t recall him ever getting arrested for protesting at the gates of the School of the Americas.   He wants to bomb Pakistan.  He opposes the war in Iraq, but not American imperialism.  He has not spoken of reparations to Iraqis or to American blacks for their ill-treatment.

Barack Obama is like Michael J. Fox in blackface.   I doubt he ever shared a word with Harry Belafonte.   He is a product of &quot;the system&quot;.  He is a Harvard Man,  not a product of Georgetown.  If he showed up in the inner city, he would probably get his ass kicked, robbed, and maybe raped, cause he is &quot;pretty&quot;.

Barack wants change, as in &quot;change the channel&quot;, not change the media.  
He is an administrator, not a revolutionary.   Unfortunately, even if elected, he would be coming in at the end of empire and the pending unraveling of the national and international monetary, ecological, economic, and social systems and infrastructure will leave him as helpless and worthless as the second appendix on a set of Siamese twins.

F. Bubo</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Last time I checked, Barack Obama was a mulatto.  His is just as much white as he is black.  To look at him in media views, I would guess that he dances more like a white man than a black man.  He doesn&#8217;t seem to have any soul or any funk, though when he wants to put on the &#8220;black preacher&#8221; persona, he can do the end of sentence inflections that make him seem a little bit like a cross between Martin Luther King and Jimmy Swaggart.</p>
<p>Obama is loved by white folk because he is perceived as totally non-threatening.  He is skinny like J.J. of &#8220;What&#8217;s Happening?&#8221;  He is a schmoozer like Will Smith.  He fits in with the cops more than with the Crips.  He would be far more at home with Martha Stewart than with Angela Davis.</p>
<p>The change proposed by Obama is more superficial than substantial.  He talks the talk, but there is reason to believe he walks the walk.  I don&#8217;t recall him ever getting arrested for protesting at the gates of the School of the Americas.   He wants to bomb Pakistan.  He opposes the war in Iraq, but not American imperialism.  He has not spoken of reparations to Iraqis or to American blacks for their ill-treatment.</p>
<p>Barack Obama is like Michael J. Fox in blackface.   I doubt he ever shared a word with Harry Belafonte.   He is a product of &#8220;the system&#8221;.  He is a Harvard Man,  not a product of Georgetown.  If he showed up in the inner city, he would probably get his ass kicked, robbed, and maybe raped, cause he is &#8220;pretty&#8221;.</p>
<p>Barack wants change, as in &#8220;change the channel&#8221;, not change the media.<br />
He is an administrator, not a revolutionary.   Unfortunately, even if elected, he would be coming in at the end of empire and the pending unraveling of the national and international monetary, ecological, economic, and social systems and infrastructure will leave him as helpless and worthless as the second appendix on a set of Siamese twins.</p>
<p>F. Bubo</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: D.R. Munro</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14926</link>
		<dc:creator>D.R. Munro</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:55:30 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14926</guid>
		<description>Go back to sleep America. . . 

Your government is in control.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Go back to sleep America. . . </p>
<p>Your government is in control.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shields</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14923</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Fri, 22 Feb 2008 00:28:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14923</guid>
		<description>Hip-hop???? What the hell does that have to do with being the President of the USA? Are you guys smoking something? Or is this code?</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hip-hop???? What the hell does that have to do with being the President of the USA? Are you guys smoking something? Or is this code?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: E. Bills</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14918</link>
		<dc:creator>E. Bills</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:22:49 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14918</guid>
		<description>more irrelevant BAR talk. as a publication, they refuse to be really critical of the HipHop movement--but then they have no qualms about belittling Barack Obama. If he changed his name to Be-Rock, went street (using terms like &quot;babymama,&quot; hoe,&quot; etc) and became quasi-literate, BAR wouldn&#039;t criticize him at all. Their principles are hollow and their logic is inane. 

At the very least, I&#039;d say Obama deserves the benefit of the doubt. Tell us Mr. Ford, et al, why can&#039;t BAR give him that? If hip-hoppers get a pass, why can&#039;t somebody who might actually do some good. It really smacks of the contemporary refrain about African-Americans in this country. . . They have no real leaders. 

Now they have one and he&#039;s playing with the big boys, crossing color lines, socioeconomic lines, party lines, etc., etc., doing things no one has seen in decades--

I&#039;d say BAR is out of touch with real black agendas.

E.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>more irrelevant BAR talk. as a publication, they refuse to be really critical of the HipHop movement&#8211;but then they have no qualms about belittling Barack Obama. If he changed his name to Be-Rock, went street (using terms like &#8220;babymama,&#8221; hoe,&#8221; etc) and became quasi-literate, BAR wouldn&#8217;t criticize him at all. Their principles are hollow and their logic is inane. </p>
<p>At the very least, I&#8217;d say Obama deserves the benefit of the doubt. Tell us Mr. Ford, et al, why can&#8217;t BAR give him that? If hip-hoppers get a pass, why can&#8217;t somebody who might actually do some good. It really smacks of the contemporary refrain about African-Americans in this country. . . They have no real leaders. </p>
<p>Now they have one and he&#8217;s playing with the big boys, crossing color lines, socioeconomic lines, party lines, etc., etc., doing things no one has seen in decades&#8211;</p>
<p>I&#8217;d say BAR is out of touch with real black agendas.</p>
<p>E.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Max Shields</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14917</link>
		<dc:creator>Max Shields</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 21 Feb 2008 23:18:10 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/02/the-white-boys-and-barack-obama/#comment-14917</guid>
		<description>Tom Joad  &quot;What would you have him do? Tell it like it is in plain language like Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich? Look where they are.&quot;

So, saying we should invade Pakistan, you think is a good idea?

You see Obama&#039;s telling you all exactly how he thinks &quot;it is&quot;. His telegraphing it for you plain as day. But you aint listening. You only hear HOPE and simpleton frames (I&#039;m not implying you are a simpleton, btw). That&#039;s just how Bill Clinton got elected. Liberals thought, he&#039;s just doing what he needs to do to get elected then we&#039;ll have &quot;our day&quot;. Didn&#039;t happen. In fact, when he said he was for the death penalty he really meant it and installed 3 strikes your out - and look at the incarceration stats today. Free trade? You bet and then some. He got the NAFTA deal Reagan could only dream of.

No, Obama&#039;s policies will be interventionists and corporate-driven. This empire will be in good hands with Obama - that is if you like empire. I don&#039;t know whether minorities will benefit. There really isn&#039;t much of coorelation between race/ethnicity and social/economic justice.

He&#039;s a Dem and committed neoliberal, a protege of Joe Lieberman. See what you want. But so far there&#039;s little to support your &quot;faith&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Tom Joad  &#8220;What would you have him do? Tell it like it is in plain language like Ron Paul and Dennis Kucinich? Look where they are.&#8221;</p>
<p>So, saying we should invade Pakistan, you think is a good idea?</p>
<p>You see Obama&#8217;s telling you all exactly how he thinks &#8220;it is&#8221;. His telegraphing it for you plain as day. But you aint listening. You only hear HOPE and simpleton frames (I&#8217;m not implying you are a simpleton, btw). That&#8217;s just how Bill Clinton got elected. Liberals thought, he&#8217;s just doing what he needs to do to get elected then we&#8217;ll have &#8220;our day&#8221;. Didn&#8217;t happen. In fact, when he said he was for the death penalty he really meant it and installed 3 strikes your out &#8211; and look at the incarceration stats today. Free trade? You bet and then some. He got the NAFTA deal Reagan could only dream of.</p>
<p>No, Obama&#8217;s policies will be interventionists and corporate-driven. This empire will be in good hands with Obama &#8211; that is if you like empire. I don&#8217;t know whether minorities will benefit. There really isn&#8217;t much of coorelation between race/ethnicity and social/economic justice.</p>
<p>He&#8217;s a Dem and committed neoliberal, a protege of Joe Lieberman. See what you want. But so far there&#8217;s little to support your &#8220;faith&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

