<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Eating Sarko</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 02:53:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: heike</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-14073</link>
		<dc:creator>heike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 05 Feb 2008 21:18:40 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-14073</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[By the way, he is not always subtle, as his hate-filled reference to Arabs as scum when minister of interior in Jacques Chirac’s cabinet revealed.

More disinformation.  He never called Arabs scum.  His remarks were directed at rioters who had held French towns under siege and were nighly burning an average of 90 vehicles in 2005.   The actual word he used in French was racaille, meaning rabble.  The word had been used by one of his ministerial colleagues three years earlier, but who then criticized S. for using the same term.

//Among those criticising Sarkozy&#039;s inflammatory language has been France&#039;s equal opportunities minister, Azouz Begag, although as Le Monde observes, the minister himself had already coined the term in quieter times in 2002 to describe a &quot;group of young people who frighten everyone, who ride scooters without helmets, ride on the pavements with no regard for pedestrians, and ignore traffic lights just as they challenge all other codes of social conduct&quot;.//

http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2005/11/08/inflammatory_language.html

If you are the Minister of Interior of your country, charged with keeping law and order, and you are confronted by rioters night after night, what word would be appropriate to use?   Nice little teenagers, please don&#039;t burn your neighbors&#039; cars, now.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>By the way, he is not always subtle, as his hate-filled reference to Arabs as scum when minister of interior in Jacques Chirac’s cabinet revealed.</p>
<p>More disinformation.  He never called Arabs scum.  His remarks were directed at rioters who had held French towns under siege and were nighly burning an average of 90 vehicles in 2005.   The actual word he used in French was racaille, meaning rabble.  The word had been used by one of his ministerial colleagues three years earlier, but who then criticized S. for using the same term.</p>
<p>//Among those criticising Sarkozy&#8217;s inflammatory language has been France&#8217;s equal opportunities minister, Azouz Begag, although as Le Monde observes, the minister himself had already coined the term in quieter times in 2002 to describe a &#8220;group of young people who frighten everyone, who ride scooters without helmets, ride on the pavements with no regard for pedestrians, and ignore traffic lights just as they challenge all other codes of social conduct&#8221;.//</p>
<p><a href="http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2005/11/08/inflammatory_language.html" rel="nofollow">http://blogs.guardian.co.uk/news/archives/2005/11/08/inflammatory_language.html</a></p>
<p>If you are the Minister of Interior of your country, charged with keeping law and order, and you are confronted by rioters night after night, what word would be appropriate to use?   Nice little teenagers, please don&#8217;t burn your neighbors&#8217; cars, now.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heike</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13991</link>
		<dc:creator>heike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 13:52:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13991</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In reply to your comments:
1)  Corbeau means poison pen writer in colloquial French.  That&#039;s what Le Figaro called him, noting that the use of the Val D&#039;Oise internet cafe was designed to insure there would be no traces.  You can call him anything you  like, but that doesn&#039;t change the way Le Figaro reported it.  I was objecting to media taking the story and making it into something that it wasn&#039;t.  You&#039;re obviously inclined to believe any slanders against Sarkozy because you simply don&#039;t like his political positions.
2) Yes, the commies were and are a nasty bunch of people, responsible for wars, occupation and genocide.  
3) No, I&#039;m not a Mc Cain supporter.  It is so typical of you that you even ask that question -- is that the limitation of your world view?  Anyone who disagrees with you HAS to be a McCain supporter?  Why don&#039;t you grow up?
4) Don&#039;t try to change your words now:   
...Czech Republic, where citizens are strongly against one of Sarko’s pet schemes — to tear Kosovo away from Serbia, seeing it as a reenactment of the Munich agreement of 1938

You said the citizens are STRONGLY AGAINST Kosovo&#039;s independence.  You don&#039;t have a single source for that allegation.  As I wrote, I have gone through many Czech language sources and fail to find any support for your allegation.   It is to be understood that the KSCM will oppose anything promoted by the Western alliance, and yes, they are headed by a bunch of people who have refused to come to terms with the crimes committed by their forebears.  

5)  Now that you&#039;re asking questions, I&#039;d like to address some to you:

a)  You wrote that only &quot;Zionists&quot; have condemned the Protocols as a forgery.  Does that mean you accept that the Protocols are a genuine document?

b)  Who is the &quot;imperial bully&quot; in this case?  You don&#039;t think that Muslims in former Yugoslavia have justified grievances against the Serbs?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In reply to your comments:<br />
1)  Corbeau means poison pen writer in colloquial French.  That&#8217;s what Le Figaro called him, noting that the use of the Val D&#8217;Oise internet cafe was designed to insure there would be no traces.  You can call him anything you  like, but that doesn&#8217;t change the way Le Figaro reported it.  I was objecting to media taking the story and making it into something that it wasn&#8217;t.  You&#8217;re obviously inclined to believe any slanders against Sarkozy because you simply don&#8217;t like his political positions.<br />
2) Yes, the commies were and are a nasty bunch of people, responsible for wars, occupation and genocide.<br />
3) No, I&#8217;m not a Mc Cain supporter.  It is so typical of you that you even ask that question &#8212; is that the limitation of your world view?  Anyone who disagrees with you HAS to be a McCain supporter?  Why don&#8217;t you grow up?<br />
4) Don&#8217;t try to change your words now:<br />
&#8230;Czech Republic, where citizens are strongly against one of Sarko’s pet schemes — to tear Kosovo away from Serbia, seeing it as a reenactment of the Munich agreement of 1938</p>
<p>You said the citizens are STRONGLY AGAINST Kosovo&#8217;s independence.  You don&#8217;t have a single source for that allegation.  As I wrote, I have gone through many Czech language sources and fail to find any support for your allegation.   It is to be understood that the KSCM will oppose anything promoted by the Western alliance, and yes, they are headed by a bunch of people who have refused to come to terms with the crimes committed by their forebears.  </p>
<p>5)  Now that you&#8217;re asking questions, I&#8217;d like to address some to you:</p>
<p>a)  You wrote that only &#8220;Zionists&#8221; have condemned the Protocols as a forgery.  Does that mean you accept that the Protocols are a genuine document?</p>
<p>b)  Who is the &#8220;imperial bully&#8221; in this case?  You don&#8217;t think that Muslims in former Yugoslavia have justified grievances against the Serbs?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Eric Walberg</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13987</link>
		<dc:creator>Eric Walberg</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 04 Feb 2008 12:16:53 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13987</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I enjoyed reading the various comments, though some were distortions and others mistaken readings:

&gt;Calling Arabs “scum”? He didn’t!
He did. This was widely reported (NTY)

&gt;Hitler an agent of the Americans!
? Petain an agent of Germans, Sarko an agent of the Americans. Try reading again.

&gt;Kosovo, Sarko’s pet scheme!
&quot;One of his pet schemes&quot; France and Germany were very much involved in the whole process of occupying Kosovo and supporting the bandit &quot;freedom fighters&quot; and will recognise the Repub of K the moment it is declared.

 &gt;he doesn’t realise that Sarko has not succeeded in implementing any part of his policy and his popularity is in the toilet 

Try reading what I write - that&#039;s exactly what I say.

&gt;“Is this really happening?”
Yes, unfortunately. And there will be lots more to come.

&gt;Le Figaro reported that the accusations were part of an e-mail sent by an anonymous poison-pen writer from an internet cafe in Val-Oise
-&quot;poison-pen&quot;? maybe &quot;truthful pen&quot;? It was reported with lots of details about his accomplices, and it all adds up. Check the original Figaro. They have no reason to defame their conservative ally.

&gt;KGB used to plant stories in Indian papers
Yes, yes. the nasty commies. Are you by chance a McCain supporter?

&gt;The “Petain” business was spread by a Maoist French professor, who has his own political agenda, but isn’t taken seriously by most folks in his home country. 
You really have your hand on the French pulse. This again was widely reported, and I suspect any intelligent Frenchperson will agree.

&gt;1940-44, not 1939-45
Thanks.

&gt;Hardly anyone takes seriously the possibility that the Sudeten Germans would use the Kosovo experience to try to “reannex” their territory. 
Am I too fast for you? I was merely saying that Czechs have this memory of Western betrayal etched in their DNA and react vicerally to the odious machinations of the new imperial bully.

&gt;most vocal in the CR about the issue are from the Communist Party of Czech and Moravia (KSCM). 

which of course means the comparison is evil and sinister - you really are a McCain supporter, then?

&gt;Europe is intended not only to be a loyal satrap to Israeli and US plans in the Middle East, but in the coming wars with Russia and China

well said.

a mistake my critics missed: it is Jourdain - Moliere&#039;s Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme - who is the prototype for Sarko. And my revised version ends: . And just as he is using the Islamophbia card to gain a base in the Gulf, he is pushing Iran and Egypt into finally renewing diplomatic relations after almost 30 years. Pétain or Jourdain? Whatever he is, we are sure to be in for more indigestion and continued efforts by us — his victims — to find bromides.

I welcome comments about my other &quot;tirades&quot;. Would that we lived in a world that didn&#039;t need them.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I enjoyed reading the various comments, though some were distortions and others mistaken readings:</p>
<p>&gt;Calling Arabs “scum”? He didn’t!<br />
He did. This was widely reported (NTY)</p>
<p>&gt;Hitler an agent of the Americans!<br />
? Petain an agent of Germans, Sarko an agent of the Americans. Try reading again.</p>
<p>&gt;Kosovo, Sarko’s pet scheme!<br />
&#8220;One of his pet schemes&#8221; France and Germany were very much involved in the whole process of occupying Kosovo and supporting the bandit &#8220;freedom fighters&#8221; and will recognise the Repub of K the moment it is declared.</p>
<p> &gt;he doesn’t realise that Sarko has not succeeded in implementing any part of his policy and his popularity is in the toilet </p>
<p>Try reading what I write &#8211; that&#8217;s exactly what I say.</p>
<p>&gt;“Is this really happening?”<br />
Yes, unfortunately. And there will be lots more to come.</p>
<p>&gt;Le Figaro reported that the accusations were part of an e-mail sent by an anonymous poison-pen writer from an internet cafe in Val-Oise<br />
-&#8221;poison-pen&#8221;? maybe &#8220;truthful pen&#8221;? It was reported with lots of details about his accomplices, and it all adds up. Check the original Figaro. They have no reason to defame their conservative ally.</p>
<p>&gt;KGB used to plant stories in Indian papers<br />
Yes, yes. the nasty commies. Are you by chance a McCain supporter?</p>
<p>&gt;The “Petain” business was spread by a Maoist French professor, who has his own political agenda, but isn’t taken seriously by most folks in his home country.<br />
You really have your hand on the French pulse. This again was widely reported, and I suspect any intelligent Frenchperson will agree.</p>
<p>&gt;1940-44, not 1939-45<br />
Thanks.</p>
<p>&gt;Hardly anyone takes seriously the possibility that the Sudeten Germans would use the Kosovo experience to try to “reannex” their territory.<br />
Am I too fast for you? I was merely saying that Czechs have this memory of Western betrayal etched in their DNA and react vicerally to the odious machinations of the new imperial bully.</p>
<p>&gt;most vocal in the CR about the issue are from the Communist Party of Czech and Moravia (KSCM). </p>
<p>which of course means the comparison is evil and sinister &#8211; you really are a McCain supporter, then?</p>
<p>&gt;Europe is intended not only to be a loyal satrap to Israeli and US plans in the Middle East, but in the coming wars with Russia and China</p>
<p>well said.</p>
<p>a mistake my critics missed: it is Jourdain &#8211; Moliere&#8217;s Le Bourgeois Gentilhomme &#8211; who is the prototype for Sarko. And my revised version ends: . And just as he is using the Islamophbia card to gain a base in the Gulf, he is pushing Iran and Egypt into finally renewing diplomatic relations after almost 30 years. Pétain or Jourdain? Whatever he is, we are sure to be in for more indigestion and continued efforts by us — his victims — to find bromides.</p>
<p>I welcome comments about my other &#8220;tirades&#8221;. Would that we lived in a world that didn&#8217;t need them.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Mulga Mumblebrain</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13929</link>
		<dc:creator>Mulga Mumblebrain</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 03 Feb 2008 01:15:31 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13929</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[Methinks you protest too much heike. The article contains some schoolboy errors of history, but to decry its message as &#039;fantasy&#039;, &#039;blatant lies&#039; and &#039;disinformation&#039; goes too far, I believe. You&#039;ve got to broaden your mind!
                      You mention the KGB leaking false stories to Indian papers, but give no concrete details. Surely you are not implying that it was the perfidious Communists alone who practiced these tactics?It is another well-known tactic to leak a truth, but one somewhat distorted so it can be denounced as a fabrication, along with the truth beneath. One is put immediately in mind of the smearing of de Villepin when he was presented with what, allegedly, turned out to be false evidence of misbehaviour by Sarkozy. When he did his duty, and investigated the allegations, he was denounced as if he concocted the allegations himself. Voila! An obstacle to Sarkozy&#039;s rise is removed, by a clever set-up. Now, tell me, heike, from your extensive research, who do you imagine set up de Villepin?
                             Of course, there is even the possibility that Mr Walberg is himself either a willing or duped conduit for disinformation. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. There is a tremendous effort underway to enlist Europe into the &#039;Clash of Civilizations&#039;. Pro-Israeli agitation and intrigue has led to the despicable situation that most of the European regimes are turning a blind eye to the increased repression, murder and dispossession of the Palestinians, for fear of being branded &#039;anti-Semitic&#039; and bullied by the US, if they do otherwise. NATO is being turned into a military arm of Western neo-colonial exploitation, in Afghanistan, so far, but planned to spread throughout the world if the Boss in Washington so decides. Ultimately, of course, Europe is intended not only to be a loyal satrap to Israeli and US plans in the Middle East, but in the coming wars with Russia and China. These may be Cold Wars, or perhaps not. The determination of the US to set up first-strike facilities in Poland and the Czech Republic, the so-called &#039;missile defence&#039; fraud, shows the US is still ruthlessly determined to reduce Russia to satrap status, hoping no doubt to intervene in Russian politics and install a new Yeltsin, or something worse. Then it will be China&#039;s turn. Where Europe sits in such confrontations depends on the true character and motivations of the likes of Sarkozy. I myself believe it very possible Sarkozy is more than merely sympathetic to Israel and the US. But only time will tell.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Methinks you protest too much heike. The article contains some schoolboy errors of history, but to decry its message as &#8216;fantasy&#8217;, &#8216;blatant lies&#8217; and &#8216;disinformation&#8217; goes too far, I believe. You&#8217;ve got to broaden your mind!<br />
                      You mention the KGB leaking false stories to Indian papers, but give no concrete details. Surely you are not implying that it was the perfidious Communists alone who practiced these tactics?It is another well-known tactic to leak a truth, but one somewhat distorted so it can be denounced as a fabrication, along with the truth beneath. One is put immediately in mind of the smearing of de Villepin when he was presented with what, allegedly, turned out to be false evidence of misbehaviour by Sarkozy. When he did his duty, and investigated the allegations, he was denounced as if he concocted the allegations himself. Voila! An obstacle to Sarkozy&#8217;s rise is removed, by a clever set-up. Now, tell me, heike, from your extensive research, who do you imagine set up de Villepin?<br />
                             Of course, there is even the possibility that Mr Walberg is himself either a willing or duped conduit for disinformation. The proof of the pudding is in the eating. There is a tremendous effort underway to enlist Europe into the &#8216;Clash of Civilizations&#8217;. Pro-Israeli agitation and intrigue has led to the despicable situation that most of the European regimes are turning a blind eye to the increased repression, murder and dispossession of the Palestinians, for fear of being branded &#8216;anti-Semitic&#8217; and bullied by the US, if they do otherwise. NATO is being turned into a military arm of Western neo-colonial exploitation, in Afghanistan, so far, but planned to spread throughout the world if the Boss in Washington so decides. Ultimately, of course, Europe is intended not only to be a loyal satrap to Israeli and US plans in the Middle East, but in the coming wars with Russia and China. These may be Cold Wars, or perhaps not. The determination of the US to set up first-strike facilities in Poland and the Czech Republic, the so-called &#8216;missile defence&#8217; fraud, shows the US is still ruthlessly determined to reduce Russia to satrap status, hoping no doubt to intervene in Russian politics and install a new Yeltsin, or something worse. Then it will be China&#8217;s turn. Where Europe sits in such confrontations depends on the true character and motivations of the likes of Sarkozy. I myself believe it very possible Sarkozy is more than merely sympathetic to Israel and the US. But only time will tell.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: heike</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13788</link>
		<dc:creator>heike</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 13:50:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13788</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is so typical of the kind of &quot;journalism&quot; practiced by DV and the people who write for it.  Put out any accusation that is designed to discredit the &quot;enemy,&quot; no matter how  fantasy-filled it may be.  Never check the facts.  As far as the &quot;Mossad&quot; caper is concerned, Le Figaro reported that the accusations were part of an e-mail sent by an anonymous poison-pen writer from an internet cafe in Val-Oise.  

Les policiers ont découvert que le message est parti d&#039;un cybercafé du Val-d&#039;Oise.

In the blogosphere, there are hundreds of people waiting to jump at the opportunity to spread these kinds of lies because they advance their own political agenda.  Papers such as Al-Ahram, which W. writes for, simply spread the story as the unvarnished &quot;truth.&quot;  The fact that Le Figaro reported this caper is twisted to suggest that they confirmed the gist of the story.  This is a typical disinformation tactic that has been used for decades.  The KGB used to plant stories in Indian papers that were prepostrous but then they could go back and claim, &quot;as the Indian paper xxx reported,&quot;

The &quot;Petain&quot; business was spread by a Maoist French professor, who has his own political agenda, but isn&#039;t taken seriously by most folks in his home country.  France was occupied from 1940-44, not 1939-45, and the southern part of the country was occupied from November 1942-August 1944.  I have carefully gone through Czech-language sources on Kosovo.  Most of them report the concerns of other states in Europe regarding minority separation, but very few deal with the Sudetenland.  Hardly anyone takes seriously the possibility that the Sudeten Germans would use the Kosovo experience to try to &quot;reannex&quot; their territory.  Yes, some people in Europe have given up the &quot;right to return.&quot;  The people who are most vocal in the CR about the issue are from the Communist Party of Czech and Moravia (KSCM).  


If you have to put out such blatant lies and disinformation to make your &quot;point,&quot; how much validity is there to your assertions?]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>This is so typical of the kind of &#8220;journalism&#8221; practiced by DV and the people who write for it.  Put out any accusation that is designed to discredit the &#8220;enemy,&#8221; no matter how  fantasy-filled it may be.  Never check the facts.  As far as the &#8220;Mossad&#8221; caper is concerned, Le Figaro reported that the accusations were part of an e-mail sent by an anonymous poison-pen writer from an internet cafe in Val-Oise.  </p>
<p>Les policiers ont découvert que le message est parti d&#8217;un cybercafé du Val-d&#8217;Oise.</p>
<p>In the blogosphere, there are hundreds of people waiting to jump at the opportunity to spread these kinds of lies because they advance their own political agenda.  Papers such as Al-Ahram, which W. writes for, simply spread the story as the unvarnished &#8220;truth.&#8221;  The fact that Le Figaro reported this caper is twisted to suggest that they confirmed the gist of the story.  This is a typical disinformation tactic that has been used for decades.  The KGB used to plant stories in Indian papers that were prepostrous but then they could go back and claim, &#8220;as the Indian paper xxx reported,&#8221;</p>
<p>The &#8220;Petain&#8221; business was spread by a Maoist French professor, who has his own political agenda, but isn&#8217;t taken seriously by most folks in his home country.  France was occupied from 1940-44, not 1939-45, and the southern part of the country was occupied from November 1942-August 1944.  I have carefully gone through Czech-language sources on Kosovo.  Most of them report the concerns of other states in Europe regarding minority separation, but very few deal with the Sudetenland.  Hardly anyone takes seriously the possibility that the Sudeten Germans would use the Kosovo experience to try to &#8220;reannex&#8221; their territory.  Yes, some people in Europe have given up the &#8220;right to return.&#8221;  The people who are most vocal in the CR about the issue are from the Communist Party of Czech and Moravia (KSCM).  </p>
<p>If you have to put out such blatant lies and disinformation to make your &#8220;point,&#8221; how much validity is there to your assertions?</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Harmoon</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13781</link>
		<dc:creator>Harmoon</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 31 Jan 2008 08:54:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13781</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[In a broader spectrum, ex-Mossad, with dual French-Isreali loyalty; we have many of them in US. they consider themselves ultimate winners: fill up their pockets, manipulate internal affairs of western countries, and change the direction of foreign policies to the like of Zionist agenda. Western societies are not themselves that innocent either, with dierty bag of racism, arrogance, and self centrism they ask for it. One fact for sure characters like Sarkozy are snake oil salesman, after all they are repeating the same mantra that are done before. they cheat and steal and the future will pay for it.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>In a broader spectrum, ex-Mossad, with dual French-Isreali loyalty; we have many of them in US. they consider themselves ultimate winners: fill up their pockets, manipulate internal affairs of western countries, and change the direction of foreign policies to the like of Zionist agenda. Western societies are not themselves that innocent either, with dierty bag of racism, arrogance, and self centrism they ask for it. One fact for sure characters like Sarkozy are snake oil salesman, after all they are repeating the same mantra that are done before. they cheat and steal and the future will pay for it.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Pierre</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13765</link>
		<dc:creator>Pierre</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 22:43:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13765</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[LOL. That&#039;s the one. I&#039;m unsubscribing.]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LOL. That&#8217;s the one. I&#8217;m unsubscribing.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kenny</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13755</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 30 Jan 2008 19:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2008/01/eating-sarko/#comment-13755</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[I don&#039;t think I&#039;ve laughed so hard in a long time. Certainly not since Mr Walberg last delivered himself of one of his tirades! Sarko the Mossad agent! I loved it! Calling Arabs &quot;scum&quot;? He didn&#039;t! Hitler an agent of the Americans! And Petain, who goverened the part of France NOT occupied by the Germans and only after the Frenach defeat in 1940! Kosovo, Sarko&#039;s pet scheme! The Czech Republic as the only place in Europe which opposes Bush&#039;s, not Sarko&#039;s plans! France wanting to invade Iran! And, of course, he is so ignorant of what is happening in France that he doesn&#039;t realise that Sarko has not succeeded in implementing any part of his policy and his popularity is in the toilet because of it! The latest toes he has walked on are those of the taxi drivers! The man is fast becoming a figure of ridicule and his amorous escapades is adding mightily to that! 

&quot;Is this really happening?&quot;, asks Mr Walberg. Well, no, as a matter of fact, it isn&#039;t!]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I don&#8217;t think I&#8217;ve laughed so hard in a long time. Certainly not since Mr Walberg last delivered himself of one of his tirades! Sarko the Mossad agent! I loved it! Calling Arabs &#8220;scum&#8221;? He didn&#8217;t! Hitler an agent of the Americans! And Petain, who goverened the part of France NOT occupied by the Germans and only after the Frenach defeat in 1940! Kosovo, Sarko&#8217;s pet scheme! The Czech Republic as the only place in Europe which opposes Bush&#8217;s, not Sarko&#8217;s plans! France wanting to invade Iran! And, of course, he is so ignorant of what is happening in France that he doesn&#8217;t realise that Sarko has not succeeded in implementing any part of his policy and his popularity is in the toilet because of it! The latest toes he has walked on are those of the taxi drivers! The man is fast becoming a figure of ridicule and his amorous escapades is adding mightily to that! </p>
<p>&#8220;Is this really happening?&#8221;, asks Mr Walberg. Well, no, as a matter of fact, it isn&#8217;t!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
