The USA’s Human Rights Daze

The chances are slim that you saw much news coverage of Human Rights Day when it blew past the media radar — as usual — on Dec. 10. Human rights may be touted as a treasured principle in the United States, but the assessed value in medialand is apt to fluctuate widely on the basis of double standards and narrow definitions.

Every political system, no matter how repressive or democratic, is able to amp up public outrage over real or imagined violations of human rights. News media can easily fixate on stories of faraway injustice and cruelty. But the lofty stances end up as posturing to the extent that a single standard is not applied.

When US-allied governments torture political prisoners, the likelihood of US media scrutiny is much lower than the probability of media righteousness against governments reviled by official Washington.

But what are “human rights” anyway? In the USA, we mostly think of them as freedom to speak, assemble, worship and express opinions. Of course those are crucial rights. Yet they hardly span the broad scope that’s spelled out in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights.

That document — adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on Dec. 10, 1948 — affirms “human rights” in the ways that US media outlets commonly illuminate the meaning of the term. But the Declaration of Human Rights also defines the rights of all human
beings to include “freedom from fear and want” — and not only as generalities.

For instance, the first clause of Article 23 states: “Everyone has the right to work, to free choice of employment, to just and favorable conditions of work and to protection against unemployment.”

And: “Everyone, without any discrimination, has the right to equal pay for equal work”; the right “to form and to join trade unions”; and, overall, “an existence worthy of human dignity, and supplemented, if necessary, by other means of social protection.”

Perhaps the farthest afield from the customary US media parameters is Article 25 of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, which insists: “Everyone has the right to a standard of living adequate for the health and well-being of himself and of his family, including food, clothing, housing and medical care and necessary social services, and the right to security in the event of unemployment, sickness, disability, widowhood, old age or other lack of livelihood in circumstances beyond his control.”

Measured with such yardsticks for human rights, the United States falls far short of many countries. If American news media did a better job of reporting on human rights in all their dimensions, we’d be less self-satisfied as a nation — and more outraged about the widespread violations of human rights that persist in our midst every day.

The human consequences of those violations are incalculable, but they’re largely removed from the center stage of dramas that fill news pages and newscasts. This downplaying of economic human rights is not mere happenstance. The violations are systemic — within a
system that thrives on extreme inequities, creating enormous profits for corporations and enriching some individuals along the way.

Within the boundaries of dominant news media and mainline political discourse, the “issue” of human rights is in a narrow box. It severely limits the humanity of our social order.

Norman Solomon is co-founder of and founding director of the Institute for Public Accuracy. His books include War Made Easy: How Presidents and Pundits Keep Spinning Us to Death. He writes the Political Culture 2013 column. Read other articles by Norman, or visit Norman's website.

4 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. Mike McNiven said on December 19th, 2007 at 7:52pm #

    Women rights are Human Rights:

  2. Mike McNiven said on December 20th, 2007 at 4:44pm #

    No US intervention in Iran! Period! Which means no war and or any form of intervention in Iran! The people of Iran in 1979 voted against all forms of US presence in Iran! All power to them (the Iranian women had a very major role in the anti-imperialist uprisings of 1978/1979!)

    The subject of the article is human rights and that doe not exist in the US or Israel or Iran!
    US government/ corporations/ non-profits/ universities are the number one violators ohf Human Rights in the world and the worst example! No doubt about it for one moment! However, our efforts against US imperialism and war mongering must not interfere with the independent struggle of people of Iran for social justice! They are against war too! In my view, Brzezinski and Gary Sick,… are trying to prevent the majority of Iranians to achieve the “social justice” state that
    has been their wish since 1953 (the year of US coup!) In other words, Brzezinski wants a smiling US intervention in Iran, while Cheney likes a bloody intervention in Iran! People of Iran do not want either of those US interventions based on many polls done inside Iran. The ruling theocracy in Iran is Brzezinski’s choice not the choice of the majority of Iranian prople who are in agreement with you!

  3. Mike McNiven said on December 22nd, 2007 at 10:18pm #

    Lack of women rights in occupied Iraq:

  4. Mike McNiven said on December 25th, 2007 at 8:18pm #

    US/Israeli barbarity against some forgotten people: