War Made Easy

War Made Easy, a documentary narrated by Sean Penn and featuring the careful analysis of dissident journalist Norman Solomon, opened across the U.S. several months ago. It is still in theatres, and also being screened at house parties and other public presentations by anti-war groups including Veterans for Peace as a spur to encourage work for peace. An adaptation of Solomon’s 2005 book of the same name, the film goes further than most recent documentaries on the current Iraq war by not merely looking at Bush Administration mismanagement or avarice, but also examining propaganda that the U.S. military and government repeatedly use to, as Solomon puts it, “keep spinning us to death.”

As such, the film does less to let Democrats off the hook than other recent examinations of George W’s Iraq disaster. Democratic Presidents including Lyndon Johnson are shown lying shamelessly about U.S. military action in Vietnam and elsewhere, and news clips show Bill Clinton and other Democrats who were quick to wage war insisting, as do their their Republican counterparts, that launching mass slaughter is the last thing they want to do.

Solomon points out that on mainstream TV, “if you’re pro-war, you’re ‘objective,’ but if you’re anti-war, you’re ‘biased.’” Three weeks before the 2003 invasion of Baghdad, doveish Phil Donahue was axed even though he had the highest rated show on MSNBC, while the notoriously pro-military Fox News repeatedly described George Bush as if he was Gary Cooper about to do battle with the forces of evil in a Hollywood western rather than a chief of state about to launch a war that would kill hundreds of thousands of civilians.

In dissecting how ever-more simplistic sound bites are used to sell wars, Solomon rightly points out, “it’s more powerful to leave things out than to tell lies.” In numerous cases, chief among the omissions is relevant history of past Washington support for the dictator du jour. As media critic Jeff Cohen notes in the film, “Journalists, too many of them — some quite explicitly — have said that they see their mission as helping the war effort. And if you define your mission that way, you’ll end up suppressing news that might be important, accurate, but maybe isn’t helpful to the war effort.”

And of course, if the end is noble, justification is that much easier. In Solomon’s words, “war becomes perpetual when it’s used as a rationale for peace.”

Footage from vintage cold war propaganda about the “international criminal conspiracy” of “godless” socialism looks like perverse comic relief until Solomon notes how closely the overheated “red scare” rhetoric parallels George Bush’s “axis of evil” scare-mongering.

Alas, hyperbolic jingoism continues to be repeated like clockwork as the military industrial complex pushes yet another war for dubious reasons. Recently, Secretary of State Condoleeza Rice claimed “the policies of Iran constitute perhaps the single greatest challenge to American security interests in the Middle East and around the world.” Less noted in the US mainstream press was the fact that Mohammed ElBaradei, head of the International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA), reports that there is no evidence of an active nuclear weapons program in Iran. ElBaradei based his judgment on the findings of IAEA inspectors in Iran, as when he made a similar observation about Iraq in early 2003.

The Washington Post reported on memos written by former Defense Secretary Donald H. Rumsfeld in which the armchair warrior “wrote of the need to ‘keep elevating the threat,’ ‘link Iraq to Iran’ and develop ‘bumper sticker statements’ to rally public support for an increasingly unpopular war.”

In pondering the current state of U.S. foreign policy, two figures cited at the conclusion of War Made Easy stand out. One is independent journalist I.F. Stone, who noted the importance of remembering that “all governments lie.” The other is Martin Luther King, Jr, who the film shows saying, “A nation that continues year after year to spend more money on military defense than on programs of social uplift is approaching spiritual death.”

Ben Terrall is a freelance writer whose work has appeared in the San Francisco Chronicle, In These Times, Counterpunch, Lip Magazine, and other publications. He can be reached at: bterrall@igc.org. Read other articles by Ben, or visit Ben's website.

3 comments on this article so far ...

Comments RSS feed

  1. Deadbeat said on November 19th, 2007 at 11:23am #

    Unfortunately, in a display of powerlessness, Soloman joined the “Anybody But Bush” camp in 2004 and actively debated Peter Camajo against a Nader candidacy. Thus helping to contribute to the current weakness of the anti-war movement and the general weakness of the left.

  2. Robert B. Livingston said on November 19th, 2007 at 9:23pm #

    Shadow On The Faces

    Many smart and sincere persons on the left like Solomon joined the ABB camp– even signing statements asking Nader not to run.

    “Totalitarian.”

    That is just how Camejo now characterizes any statements that tell people: “don’t run.”

    How many have since apologized?

    Better– how many can throw their complete support to people who are making demands, like Cindy Sheehan–

    – and not for traitors that rebuff them again and again– who mock us all by proudly declaring that “everything is on the table” when that could mean more killing and that “everything is off the table” when that could mean saving lives?

  3. AJ Nasreddin said on November 20th, 2007 at 11:22am #

    Nader is a nice guy, but remember that he’s an Arab-American. Even though he’s Christian, no doubt they’d come up with some sort of attack like that of saying Obama went to a “madrassa” (which incidentally is Arabic for “school” – Bush’s poor command of English suggests that he never attended a madrassa).