Comments on: The Infinite Potential of the Human Mind http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/ a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice Mon, 23 Nov 2009 01:40:38 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Michael Davis http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-34231 Michael Davis Mon, 22 Dec 2008 21:46:06 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-34231 I strongly disagree. Instead of thinking of capitalism as a profit mongering machine think of it as a tool that drives creativity and outfits the have nots with an avenue to compete against the elitists using nothing but imagination. look at mark cuban, russell simmons, peter jennings. we all step into the world outside and are subject to the same risks and possibilities of positive and negative outcome, however it's our own ego that steps in the way of successfully obtaining homeostasic society. this will always be the case when we stop taking responsibility for our own role int the machine and blame the machine. ignoring the fact that it could be operator error. never underestimate that the world outside and the society are attempting to prolong its survival by only allowing the fittest to survive. we all know this whether we admit it or not the facts are quite obvious. I strongly disagree. Instead of thinking of capitalism as a profit mongering machine think of it as a tool that drives creativity and outfits the have nots with an avenue to compete against the elitists using nothing but imagination. look at mark cuban, russell simmons, peter jennings. we all step into the world outside and are subject to the same risks and possibilities of positive and negative outcome, however it’s our own ego that steps in the way of successfully obtaining homeostasic society. this will always be the case when we stop taking responsibility for our own role int the machine and blame the machine. ignoring the fact that it could be operator error. never underestimate that the world outside and the society are attempting to prolong its survival by only allowing the fittest to survive. we all know this whether we admit it or not the facts are quite obvious.

]]> By: Lloyd Rowsey http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-23005 Lloyd Rowsey Fri, 27 Jun 2008 13:26:03 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-23005 Wednesday, June 25, 2008 Cuba approves, makes available lung cancer treatment Cuban scientists said on Tuesday the first vaccine to extend lives of lung cancer patients has been approved by Cuban authorities for use and is available in the island’s hospitals. The drug, CimaVax EGF, has been shown to increase survival rates on average four to five months and much longer in some patients, they said in a news conference at Cuba’s Center of Molecular Immunology. In contrast to chemotherapy, the traditional treatment for lung cancer, they said CimaVax EGF has few side effects because it is a modified protein that attacks only cancer cells. Wednesday, June 25, 2008

Cuba approves, makes available lung cancer treatment

Cuban scientists said on Tuesday the first vaccine to extend lives of lung cancer patients has been approved by Cuban authorities for use and is available in the island’s hospitals. The drug, CimaVax EGF, has been shown to increase survival rates on average four to five months and much longer in some patients, they said in a news conference at Cuba’s Center of Molecular Immunology. In contrast to chemotherapy, the traditional treatment for lung cancer, they said CimaVax EGF has few side effects because it is a modified protein that attacks only cancer cells.

]]> By: Susan Rosenthal http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-11400 Susan Rosenthal Sat, 22 Dec 2007 00:51:38 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-11400 Kevin, No one article can address all issues. I discuss the alternative to capitalism in my book, POWER and Powerlessness. You can find it at www.powerandpowerlessness.com Kevin,
No one article can address all issues.
I discuss the alternative to capitalism in my book, POWER and Powerlessness.
You can find it at http://www.powerandpowerlessness.com

]]> By: Kevin Cornwall http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-11320 Kevin Cornwall Fri, 21 Dec 2007 02:14:35 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-11320 My comments in astericks follow quotes from the article. Want to know a secret? A healthy human mind is incompatible with capitalism. Let me explain. *This is not borne out by any evidence. The existence of plenty of healthy minds around which falsify this statement.* Science tells us that the mind cannot be reduced to an activity of the brain. The mind is created and sustained in a complex dance between human beings. Cut off from social relationships, the mind loses its ability to function. Evidence for this comes from socially-deprived infants and from adults kept in isolation or subjected to sensory deprivation. *The mind is absolutely the activity of the brain. The social needs of the brain (like glucose) are part of it’s healthy activity.* For more than 95 percent of human history, people lived in small, cooperative societies. Over the past few thousand years, our species underwent an amazing cultural evolution. Our brains did not change biologically, but how we used them did. As people pooled their experiences and accumulated knowledge from one generation to the next, their minds developed. And as their minds developed, they created new social arrangements to meet their changing needs. *There is nothing new about how we use our brains or how we view ourselves or structure our thoughts (mind, if you will) from culture to culture – only the content differs.* Capitalism blocks this creative process. *Huh? You just said we created capitalism to meet changing needs. It is arguably evidence of the creative process “minds” wanted. Moreover, in terms of creativity, capitalism allows people to diverge more than in a traditional society where roles are iron-clad. By definition, divergent lifestyles are lived in more isolated units.* While knowledge continues to accumulate, it is not shared. *Knowledge has rarely been shared. It has always been kept in reserve and only made available to a hierarchy of initiates.* And while some people are moved forward, many more are hurtled backward. The central problem for capitalism is how to create profit, not how to develop human potential. To maximize profit, capitalism must disrupt human relationships and stifle human potential. *True for profit, false for society. Society has never been about human potential. It’s a luxury exclusively available to aristocracy or an emergent bourgeois class.* The more we are divided and deprived, the more wealth can be generated for the people at the top. Any form of collectivism is a threat to the system, from union organizing to demands for government-funded services. *Truisms, but how is this related to the topic of human potential? The next paragraph doesn’t make the connection.* Instead of using our minds to solve our common problems, we get to decide only which section of the elite will dominate us. *In traditional societies, people didn’t even get to decide that much Still, people in any society have never been interested in solving common problems. However, they will unite with others to solve their own problems if the benefits of doing so out-weigh the perceived costs of not doing so. People are very common sense, you know. Don’t have a long-term view, particularly not any beyond their personal community (how we evolved remember). Yet, under capitalism, for those in power and the otherwise educated, it has become an option.* Instead of working together to raise our living standards, we labor to enrich the elite. Instead of protecting ourselves and each other, we fight their barbaric but profitable wars. *Nothing historically new here with the arrival of capitalism.* The human mind crumbles under such conditions. Epidemics of anger, anxiety, inter-personal conflict and deep discouragement create an ocean of human misery. Adding insult to injury, these signs of social sickness are mislabeled as “personal problems” and “mental illness.” *Now you’re saying that not only minds can’t develop, but that they actually regress? Ever visit a poor country, the exploited working class don’t suffer any of these miseries - not unless they find themselves out-of-of-context of the prevailing world view which is pretty rare (remember: no dissidents allowed in traditional societies). In all societies, social failing is labeled as “sin”. Not new. Obviously, in capitalist, societies, the option to individuate and the acquisitiveness that supports it must come at the expense of community. Trade-offs.* To preserve itself, capitalism must block the infinite potential of the human mind. *So general relativity, atomic physics, biology, micro-biology, chemistry (name your science here), mechanization, universal plumbing, electronics, education, communications, medicine, pensions, welfare, (name your science here)… you would identify as the result of how capitalism blocked human minds? * And I do mean infinite. There is no limit to the number of ways that we could organize our lives and society. *So…* The average human brain contains approximately 100 billion nerve cells or neurons. Each neuron has about 10,000 connections with its neighbors. When you consider that each of these connections can be turned on or off, the number of possible firing patterns is greater than the number of known particles in the universe. When you add the different ways that each human mind could connect with the other six billion minds on the planet…well, I think you get the picture. *Yes, everyone has always had this picture, in every society. It comes down to a matter of time and thus prioritization. No one wants to personally track more than about a handful of other people. That is the way it has always been. It’s also the reason hierarchies and delegating responsibility developed. From government to military to business that is the way it has always been for people – regardless the numbers involved (the hierarchy just gets deeper and so less accountable).* Capitalism has stuck humanity in a giant historical rut and bamboozled us into thinking that this is the best we can do, that we have reached the end of our history. Not So! We have barely begun to explore our potential. However, if capitalism has its way, we never will. *Actually, capitalism is one way that people have come up with for exploring their potential. Like any other “product” it will give way to a better model. Try offering one and see if anyone chooses it. (Myself, in the 70’s I worked on alternative communities – not what people wanted. No, matter how grand the vision, they never lasted as the very people who created them soon began to choose maximizing their individual options – especially, once they had kids, the reproductive and economic ones. Asta la vista, commune.)* We can’t let this happen. We have created capitalism, and we can change our minds and replace it with something much better. *Huh? It’s a fait accompli And what’s better, Susan?* My comments in astericks follow quotes from the article.

Want to know a secret? A healthy human mind is incompatible with capitalism. Let me explain.

*This is not borne out by any evidence. The existence of plenty of healthy minds around which falsify this statement.*

Science tells us that the mind cannot be reduced to an activity of the brain. The mind is created and sustained in a complex dance between human beings. Cut off from social relationships, the mind loses its ability to function. Evidence for this comes from socially-deprived infants and from adults kept in isolation or subjected to sensory deprivation.

*The mind is absolutely the activity of the brain. The social needs of the brain (like glucose) are part of it’s healthy activity.*

For more than 95 percent of human history, people lived in small, cooperative societies. Over the past few thousand years, our species underwent an amazing cultural evolution. Our brains did not change biologically, but how we used them did. As people pooled their experiences and accumulated knowledge from one generation to the next, their minds developed. And as their minds developed, they created new social arrangements to meet their changing needs.

*There is nothing new about how we use our brains or how we view ourselves or structure our thoughts (mind, if you will) from culture to culture – only the content differs.*

Capitalism blocks this creative process.

*Huh? You just said we created capitalism to meet changing needs. It is arguably evidence of the creative process “minds” wanted. Moreover, in terms of creativity, capitalism allows people to diverge more than in a traditional society where roles are iron-clad. By definition, divergent lifestyles are lived in more isolated units.*

While knowledge continues to accumulate, it is not shared.

*Knowledge has rarely been shared. It has always been kept in reserve and only made available to a hierarchy of initiates.*

And while some people are moved forward, many more are hurtled backward. The central problem for capitalism is how to create profit, not how to develop human potential. To maximize profit, capitalism must disrupt human relationships and stifle human potential.

*True for profit, false for society. Society has never been about human potential. It’s a luxury exclusively available to aristocracy or an emergent bourgeois class.*

The more we are divided and deprived, the more wealth can be generated for the people at the top. Any form of collectivism is a threat to the system, from union organizing to demands for government-funded services.

*Truisms, but how is this related to the topic of human potential? The next paragraph doesn’t make the connection.*

Instead of using our minds to solve our common problems, we get to decide only which section of the elite will dominate us.

*In traditional societies, people didn’t even get to decide that much Still, people in any society have never been interested in solving common problems. However, they will unite with others to solve their own problems if the benefits of doing so out-weigh the perceived costs of not doing so. People are very common sense, you know. Don’t have a long-term view, particularly not any beyond their personal community (how we evolved remember). Yet, under capitalism, for those in power and the otherwise educated, it has become an option.*

Instead of working together to raise our living standards, we labor to enrich the elite. Instead of protecting ourselves and each other, we fight their barbaric but profitable wars.

*Nothing historically new here with the arrival of capitalism.*

The human mind crumbles under such conditions. Epidemics of anger, anxiety, inter-personal conflict and deep discouragement create an ocean of human misery. Adding insult to injury, these signs of social sickness are mislabeled as “personal problems” and “mental illness.”

*Now you’re saying that not only minds can’t develop, but that they actually regress? Ever visit a poor country, the exploited working class don’t suffer any of these miseries – not unless they find themselves out-of-of-context of the prevailing world view which is pretty rare (remember: no dissidents allowed in traditional societies). In all societies, social failing is labeled as “sin”. Not new. Obviously, in capitalist, societies, the option to individuate and the acquisitiveness that supports it must come at the expense of community. Trade-offs.*

To preserve itself, capitalism must block the infinite potential of the human mind.

*So general relativity, atomic physics, biology, micro-biology, chemistry (name your science here), mechanization, universal plumbing, electronics, education, communications, medicine, pensions, welfare, (name your science here)… you would identify as the result of how capitalism blocked human minds? *

And I do mean infinite. There is no limit to the number of ways that we could organize our lives and society.
*So…*

The average human brain contains approximately 100 billion nerve cells or neurons. Each neuron has about 10,000 connections with its neighbors. When you consider that each of these connections can be turned on or off, the number of possible firing patterns is greater than the number of known particles in the universe. When you add the different ways that each human mind could connect with the other six billion minds on the planet…well, I think you get the picture.

*Yes, everyone has always had this picture, in every society. It comes down to a matter of time and thus prioritization. No one wants to personally track more than about a handful of other people. That is the way it has always been. It’s also the reason hierarchies and delegating responsibility developed. From government to military to business that is the way it has always been for people – regardless the numbers involved (the hierarchy just gets deeper and so less accountable).*

Capitalism has stuck humanity in a giant historical rut and bamboozled us into thinking that this is the best we can do, that we have reached the end of our history. Not So! We have barely begun to explore our potential. However, if capitalism has its way, we never will.

*Actually, capitalism is one way that people have come up with for exploring their potential. Like any other “product” it will give way to a better model. Try offering one and see if anyone chooses it. (Myself, in the 70’s I worked on alternative communities – not what people wanted. No, matter how grand the vision, they never lasted as the very people who created them soon began to choose maximizing their individual options – especially, once they had kids, the reproductive and economic ones. Asta la vista, commune.)*

We can’t let this happen. We have created capitalism, and we can change our minds and replace it with something much better.

*Huh? It’s a fait accompli And what’s better, Susan?*

]]> By: Dave Patterson http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8786 Dave Patterson Mon, 12 Nov 2007 09:18:02 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8786 Dear Susan et al, I concur entirely, an extremely good article - there seem to be too few people willing to stand up and just speak that simple truth - the root of our problems today is that we have let this god called capitalism take over our society, and be ruled by its various high priests. It is a very, very bad path we are on, and if we don't get off it soon, there's not going to be much left of either human society or the planet. I just finished a book in which I talk more about this, getting into causes a bit more specifically, called 'They're Building a Box - and You're In It' - which can be found at http://www.rudemacedon.ca/dlp/box/box-intro.html should anyone be interested. Dear Susan et al, I concur entirely, an extremely good article – there seem to be too few people willing to stand up and just speak that simple truth – the root of our problems today is that we have let this god called capitalism take over our society, and be ruled by its various high priests. It is a very, very bad path we are on, and if we don’t get off it soon, there’s not going to be much left of either human society or the planet. I just finished a book in which I talk more about this, getting into causes a bit more specifically, called ‘They’re Building a Box – and You’re In It’ – which can be found at
http://www.rudemacedon.ca/dlp/box/box-intro.html should anyone be interested.

]]> By: Lloyd Rowsey http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8752 Lloyd Rowsey Sun, 11 Nov 2007 21:49:51 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8752 Well, Wingnut, I do use my own name with my emails and with everything I post. That is, you get ME when you Google to my personal name or to my email name, and the names are the same name (except for the email moniker being conflated); and I have never used other names on the interent. Is that an inferiority complex, or is that being a bit self-absorbed? (Or do you consider having an inferiority complex to be equivalent somehow to being self-absorbed?) Moreover, I too have found, in your words, "LOTS of pro-community folks around here," but have yet to identify one who is a self-proclaimed communist. Notice that I just used the word "I" four times in five sentences. You use the word much less frequently in your post, but mightn't that impersonal style of yours itself be the style of anonymously left communitarians, still fearful that using the word "communist" will adversely impact, if you will, progressive goals in America? Or do you think this is all just a matter of style, and I simply ought to start writing in the passive voice more? Howsoever, Wingnut, my feeble 2-cents worth is that you certainly make valid points regarding the other issues you raised. Thank you. Lloyd Rowsey Well, Wingnut, I do use my own name with my emails and with everything I post. That is, you get ME when you Google to my personal name or to my email name, and the names are the same name (except for the email moniker being conflated); and I have never used other names on the interent. Is that an inferiority complex, or is that being a bit self-absorbed? (Or do you consider having an inferiority complex to be equivalent somehow to being self-absorbed?) Moreover, I too have found, in your words, “LOTS of pro-community folks around here,” but have yet to identify one who is a self-proclaimed communist. Notice that I just used the word “I” four times in five sentences. You use the word much less frequently in your post, but mightn’t that impersonal style of yours itself be the style of anonymously left communitarians, still fearful that using the word “communist” will adversely impact, if you will, progressive goals in America? Or do you think this is all just a matter of style, and I simply ought to start writing in the passive voice more?

Howsoever, Wingnut, my feeble 2-cents worth is that you certainly make valid points regarding the other issues you raised. Thank you.

Lloyd Rowsey

]]> By: Wingnut http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8734 Wingnut Sun, 11 Nov 2007 18:29:11 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8734 A bit self-absorbed, Lloyd? Did you expect someone to be shocked over your self-proclaimation of being commie? "I, I, I, I, I", could you you you you you have any more of an inferiority complex? Yikes! Commune is the base word for communion, community, and commune, so there are LOTS of pro-community folks around here, as best I can tell. Capitalism's attrocious pyramid scheme structure (see backside of USA one dollar bill for pyramid scheme symbol) is what's being discussed here. Gramma told the capitalists NOT TO stack the children into farmyard pyramids of inequality, because the children on the bottom ALWAYS GET HURT! Some didn't listen... and the ones who DO know the immorality of stacking children into pyramids... are powerless and unheard, just as Susan states in her piece. Susan, I don't know much about you, but what you said in this article... is right on the nose. Capitalism is infested with servitude, and its easy to see with the massive use of the term "order" within capitalism. When someone "orders" a burger, it sends forced-to-be-there slavecorp folks into action, OR ELSE! That's felony extortion. It is illegal to force folks to join the Free Marketeers church of competing. I suggest competer's take a look at the opposite... cooperating/Christianity/altruism. Pay-up or lose-your-wellbeing is Chicago mob-brand extortion, but Elliot Ness isn't here to bust THIS mob. The Great Pyramids are out in the sandbox for a reason... and that's to remind us all... that WE WILL have a tendency to stack the children into pyramids of empowerment on THIS planet. That's my feeble 2-cents worth. Wingnut Anti-Capitalismist/Real Christian/Commun'ist MaStars - Mothers Against Stuff That Ain't Right Bessemer MI USA A bit self-absorbed, Lloyd? Did you expect someone to be shocked over your self-proclaimation of being commie? “I, I, I, I, I”, could you you you you you have any more of an inferiority complex? Yikes! Commune is the base word for communion, community, and commune, so there are LOTS of pro-community folks around here, as best I can tell. Capitalism’s attrocious pyramid scheme structure (see backside of USA one dollar bill for pyramid scheme symbol) is what’s being discussed here. Gramma told the capitalists NOT TO stack the children into farmyard pyramids of inequality, because the children on the bottom ALWAYS GET HURT! Some didn’t listen… and the ones who DO know the immorality of stacking children into pyramids… are powerless and unheard, just as Susan states in her piece.

Susan, I don’t know much about you, but what you said in this article… is right on the nose. Capitalism is infested with servitude, and its easy to see with the massive use of the term “order” within capitalism. When someone “orders” a burger, it sends forced-to-be-there slavecorp folks into action, OR ELSE! That’s felony extortion. It is illegal to force folks to join the Free Marketeers church of competing. I suggest competer’s take a look at the opposite… cooperating/Christianity/altruism.

Pay-up or lose-your-wellbeing is Chicago mob-brand extortion, but Elliot Ness isn’t here to bust THIS mob. The Great Pyramids are out in the sandbox for a reason… and that’s to remind us all… that WE WILL have a tendency to stack the children into pyramids of empowerment on THIS planet. That’s my feeble 2-cents worth.

Wingnut
Anti-Capitalismist/Real Christian/Commun’ist
MaStars – Mothers Against Stuff That Ain’t Right
Bessemer MI USA

]]> By: Lloyd Rowsey http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8708 Lloyd Rowsey Sun, 11 Nov 2007 02:29:13 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8708 Dammit. "At this point.....This POST mentioned the word "communist"....in your and my exchange of POSTS, since my first POST to you; asserted...." Dammit. “At this point…..This POST mentioned the word “communist”….in your and my exchange of POSTS, since my first POST to you; asserted….”

]]> By: Lloyd Rowsey http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8707 Lloyd Rowsey Sun, 11 Nov 2007 02:16:53 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8707 Susan. In my opinion, we need to be attuned to subtleties. You accused me of having a “fit of rage.” (“Your fit of rage in response to…”- from your second post). Not just “being angry.” (“You owe me an apology for being angry…”- from your third and last post). I admit that my anger lacked the restrained sarcasm of many of the other posts to Dissident Voice articles. I do not admit that it was very different from the anger widely expressed by other posters, and I will not apologize for something I did not do. Ie, I did not have a fit of rage. Similarly, and whatever your reaction was to my initial, admittedly angry post addressed to you, I became much angrier when Eric Patton interceded with “Lloyd, what the hell are you talking about?” I say similarly, not just because that query fits your description of having a fit of anger better than my previous post to you did, but because you seem to be demanding I apologize for my rage/anger again. To Eric Patton. Eric bowed out of the exchange writing about not pissing people off if you seek their approval (at least that’s how I read them, but that’s for Eric to say). Then there was an interceding post from Mike McNiven wishing us a A Happy Russian Revolution. And I want to interject here that sprinkled among all the posts after my first one to you and ending with Mike McNiven’s, there were posts which I read and appreciated and enjoyed. Then a few hours later you posted a kind and forthcoming note to me and to four others, including Eric, which in fact apologized to me twice. I answered you quickly and did not apologize at all; in what now reads to me as “breezy.” You took that as a rebuff and accused me of “having a fit of rage in response to feeling disregarded...,” then you went on to place my rage in a sociological perspective. At this point, I suppose my response to you was supposed to be an apology, too, but instead I wrote the post beginning, “I hope this diagnosis is not a substitute for your forwarding me the emails you said you would, doctor.” This email mentioned the word “communist” for the first time, in your and my exchange of emails, since my first email to you; asserted that my concern in regard thereto was more than a personal matter; pointed out that in fact you know very little about me; and also contained no apology. Then came your “sign off” ultimatum post. The basis for your second demand that I apologize to you (after the apology-for-having-a-fit-of-rage/being-angry one) is that I accused you of being an anti-communist without any evidence. Susan, I did not accuse you being an anti-communist. I asked you if you had failed to reply to me because I had admitted being a communist. In fact, I cannot find those emails you sent me. I have never seen them. The only evidence I have about your feelings about communism or anything else consists of your articles in DV and the posts to which we both have access at DV. Plus your excellent article last July in Counterpunch. (I was trying to be “gallant” by accepting responsibility for not finding your emails earlier, fully expecting you to email them to me.) If you are afraid of me personally, please feel free to post the emails to Dissident Voice in your reply, if you reply, to this posting. Or to hell with it. You may feel that the “rage” in my initial response is only explicable by feelings of rejection. Or you may feel this entire post is an example of not being attuned to subtleties. I actually do have a life, a very busy life trying to effect change in America. By contributing money to groups and persons I consider in the vanguard, namely BAR and IVAW and Arthur Silber. And by writing, of all things. But I’m truly exhausted with trying to write this post coherently, much less with trying to imagine the objections you have to it. Susan.
In my opinion, we need to be attuned to subtleties. You accused me of having a “fit of rage.” (“Your fit of rage in response to…”- from your second post). Not just “being angry.” (“You owe me an apology for being angry…”- from your third and last post). I admit that my anger lacked the restrained sarcasm of many of the other posts to Dissident Voice articles. I do not admit that it was very different from the anger widely expressed by other posters, and I will not apologize for something I did not do. Ie, I did not have a fit of rage.
Similarly, and whatever your reaction was to my initial, admittedly angry post addressed to you, I became much angrier when Eric Patton interceded with “Lloyd, what the hell are you talking about?” I say similarly, not just because that query fits your description of having a fit of anger better than my previous post to you did, but because you seem to be demanding I apologize for my rage/anger again. To Eric Patton.
Eric bowed out of the exchange writing about not pissing people off if you seek their approval (at least that’s how I read them, but that’s for Eric to say). Then there was an interceding post from Mike McNiven wishing us a A Happy Russian Revolution. And I want to interject here that sprinkled among all the posts after my first one to you and ending with Mike McNiven’s, there were posts which I read and appreciated and enjoyed. Then a few hours later you posted a kind and forthcoming note to me and to four others, including Eric, which in fact apologized to me twice. I answered you quickly and did not apologize at all; in what now reads to me as “breezy.” You took that as a rebuff and accused me of “having a fit of rage in response to feeling disregarded…,” then you went on to place my rage in a sociological perspective.
At this point, I suppose my response to you was supposed to be an apology, too, but instead I wrote the post beginning, “I hope this diagnosis is not a substitute for your forwarding me the emails you said you would, doctor.” This email mentioned the word “communist” for the first time, in your and my exchange of emails, since my first email to you; asserted that my concern in regard thereto was more than a personal matter; pointed out that in fact you know very little about me; and also contained no apology.
Then came your “sign off” ultimatum post. The basis for your second demand that I apologize to you (after the apology-for-having-a-fit-of-rage/being-angry one) is that I accused you of being an anti-communist without any evidence. Susan, I did not accuse you being an anti-communist. I asked you if you had failed to reply to me because I had admitted being a communist. In fact, I cannot find those emails you sent me. I have never seen them. The only evidence I have about your feelings about communism or anything else consists of your articles in DV and the posts to which we both have access at DV. Plus your excellent article last July in Counterpunch. (I was trying to be “gallant” by accepting responsibility for not finding your emails earlier, fully expecting you to email them to me.) If you are afraid of me personally, please feel free to post the emails to Dissident Voice in your reply, if you reply, to this posting.
Or to hell with it. You may feel that the “rage” in my initial response is only explicable by feelings of rejection. Or you may feel this entire post is an example of not being attuned to subtleties. I actually do have a life, a very busy life trying to effect change in America. By contributing money to groups and persons I consider in the vanguard, namely BAR and IVAW and Arthur Silber. And by writing, of all things. But I’m truly exhausted with trying to write this post coherently, much less with trying to imagine the objections you have to it.

]]> By: Susan Rosenthal http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8626 Susan Rosenthal Fri, 09 Nov 2007 00:10:53 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8626 LLoyd, It is important that everyone be held to the same standard. If you demand that others be accountable, then you must be accountable too. As I see it, you owe me an apology, actually, several of them. First for being angry that I did not respond to your comments, when I am under no obligation to do so (even though I did). Second, for accusing me of being an anti-communist, when you had no evidence that this was so. Third, for not admitting your mistake, when your accusation proved to be false. If you prefer to attack than apologize, then I cannot take you seriously and this conversation is over. LLoyd,
It is important that everyone be held to the same standard.
If you demand that others be accountable, then you must be accountable too.

As I see it, you owe me an apology, actually, several of them.
First for being angry that I did not respond to your comments, when I am under no obligation to do so (even though I did).
Second, for accusing me of being an anti-communist, when you had no evidence that this was so.
Third, for not admitting your mistake, when your accusation proved to be false.
If you prefer to attack than apologize, then I cannot take you seriously and this conversation is over.

]]> By: kikz http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8615 kikz Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:59:18 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8615 @j. wilkinson "Yes, Susan, you’re a doctor — a previous responder was so ecstatic that the medical profession is seeing the light. But is it?" tsk tsk tsk...... what i said was, i was encouraged that "individuals w/in the medical community" not the medical community itself....yadax3. the medical community (including big pharma) along with education community, are only runners up in this great game, this beauty contest for the soul/mind of man. the big mama, the winner of course wears the tiara. the church, organized religion. but the medical community does receive a congeniality sash for her efforts. j.wilkinson... i have also lived what you have written, and was "farmed" by a gyno for almost a decade. my initial comments to the dr were hopefully delivered w/subtlety as... in these dark days of our country, i try to shield any small light from being extinguished...i hate to drop a huge brain bomb on the unsuspecting, i'd rather skip a stone thru someone's consciousness than a WMD. if i had wished to, i'd of suggested "zeitgeist". but that doesn't tell it all either. i didn't mention what i considered to be a grave error in her tracing the large hairy monster to capital's door. in that she is correct, but it is not the prime external source of our present ills, as i see it. gerald, in his eloquence alluded to this, in admonishing the dr for her "lack of epistemology" inre institutionalized mindlock) declaring capitalism as it's "SHAZAM!" begining. organized religion has a 2000+year head start on capitalism, as the "big mutha" . eyeroll.............. @j. wilkinson “Yes, Susan, you’re a doctor — a previous responder was so ecstatic that the medical profession is seeing the light. But is it?”
tsk tsk tsk……
what i said was, i was encouraged that “individuals w/in the medical community” not the medical community itself….yadax3.

the medical community (including big pharma) along with education community, are only runners up in this great game, this beauty contest for the soul/mind of man.

the big mama, the winner of course wears the tiara. the church, organized religion.

but the medical community does receive a congeniality sash for her efforts. j.wilkinson… i have also lived what you have written, and was “farmed” by a gyno for almost a decade.

my initial comments to the dr were hopefully delivered w/subtlety as… in these dark days of our country, i try to shield any small light from being extinguished…i hate to drop a huge brain bomb on the unsuspecting, i’d rather skip a stone thru someone’s consciousness than a WMD. if i had wished to, i’d of suggested “zeitgeist”.
but that doesn’t tell it all either.
i didn’t mention what i considered to be a grave error in her tracing the large hairy monster to capital’s door. in that she is correct, but it is not the prime external source of our present ills, as i see it.

gerald, in his eloquence alluded to this, in admonishing the dr for her “lack of epistemology” inre institutionalized mindlock) declaring capitalism as it’s “SHAZAM!” begining.

organized religion has a 2000+year head start on capitalism, as the “big mutha” .

eyeroll…………..

]]> By: Lloyd Rowsey http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8614 Lloyd Rowsey Thu, 08 Nov 2007 19:54:01 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8614 I hope this diagnosis is not a substitute for your forwarding me the emails you said you would, doctor. For one, last time, I was not having a fit of rage. From the evidence available, I concluded it was very likely that you and/or DV were intentionally ignoring me because of my having said I was a communist; and I concluded that that had important implications not only for myself but for a great many others. In fact you really know very little about me, Doctor Rosenthal. And if you make medical diagnoses with as little to go on as you have diagnosed my recent communications as a "fit of rage," I would find it extremely distressing to be your patient. I hope this diagnosis is not a substitute for your forwarding me the emails you said you would, doctor.

For one, last time, I was not having a fit of rage. From the evidence available, I concluded it was very likely that you and/or DV were intentionally ignoring me because of my having said I was a communist; and I concluded that that had important implications not only for myself but for a great many others.

In fact you really know very little about me, Doctor Rosenthal. And if you make medical diagnoses with as little to go on as you have diagnosed my recent communications as a “fit of rage,” I would find it extremely distressing to be your patient.

]]> By: Susan Rosenthal http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8611 Susan Rosenthal Thu, 08 Nov 2007 18:19:11 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8611 LLoyd, Your fit of rage in response to feeling disregarded illustrates what I am saying in this article. Instead of understanding our emotional pain as a social problem that affects most people, we blame and attack one another (and we ALL do this from time to time, including me). This is how capitalism’s divide-and-rule strategy extends into the personal dimension. When we can’t get to the elite who are actually responsible for our pain, we direct our rage against those we can reach. If we are to build a sane and sharing society, we must learn to give each other the benefit of the doubt. It’s a mistake to assume that if we feel bad it must be the fault of the individuals around us. Most people are struggling to stay afloat emotionally, whether they show it or not. The urgent need is to build solidarity, and that means understanding that we are not alone, however alone we may feel. LLoyd,
Your fit of rage in response to feeling disregarded illustrates what I am saying in this article.
Instead of understanding our emotional pain as a social problem that affects most people, we blame and attack one another (and we ALL do this from time to time, including me).
This is how capitalism’s divide-and-rule strategy extends into the personal dimension.
When we can’t get to the elite who are actually responsible for our pain, we direct our rage against those we can reach.

If we are to build a sane and sharing society, we must learn to give each other the benefit of the doubt.
It’s a mistake to assume that if we feel bad it must be the fault of the individuals around us.
Most people are struggling to stay afloat emotionally, whether they show it or not.
The urgent need is to build solidarity, and that means understanding that we are not alone, however alone we may feel.

]]> By: Lloyd Rowsey http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8599 Lloyd Rowsey Thu, 08 Nov 2007 13:31:34 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8599 Thanks, Susan. I would appreciate your forwarding your emails again to my hotmail address. About 09.30.007, I renewed my old hotmail account and got a new one (SHAZAM!); I've been trying to figure out which features I do or do not have ever since, and I strongly suspect the two emails to which you refer are somewhere in my mail system, somewhere..... I think this clears us up otherwise. I intend to buy your book and read (on) it; I seem to be incapable of reading much of anything these days, and I'm dead set on finishing The Shock Doctrine. When I first started posting comments at DV, I included my email address and saved copies of the posts along with the names and dates of the articles they commented upon; but I discontinued both practices six weeks ago or more. I look forward very much to reading your emails to my hotmail address. Thank you for your perceptive comment. Deadbeat. I became engrossed in my exchange, of email posts to this article, with Gerald Spezio -- who speaks for himself early and often -- and I didn't get a chance to express my concurrence with you. Regarding Gerald, Susan, it's easy to mistake his irony for his straight, especially if you haven't browsed the comments to a lot of articles at Dissident Voice; and he is anything but simplistic. Eric I appreciate your understanding. I am basically a frustrated poet, not an essayist. I also write vignettes which are not even the length of short stories; or, I should say, I've written two vignettes. I assure you I've read and thought about the long, the short, and the in-between-length articles put up at Dissident Voice; and I can't find myself in them. I also assure you that I know honey draws better than vinegar. I'm working on my rage, I know it's done little for me in my life, but these are days of rage...you know? I also do not think labels are important, which brings us back to where I came in. Dissident Voice of all places should not be averse to printing articles by writers which contain confessions of communist inclinations, or past CP membership. But to repeat assertions I've made in prior posted comments at DV: I am a Cuba communist, and I understand that communism as a social system is immeasurably older than capitalism, which really got started only in the 14th century. Regarding saying things "decently" and "somewhat leftish"? I refer you to Arthur Silber's most recent writings. And regarding Susan's comment to you, I was wondering what PARECON meant. John, you are absolutely right!! And Yo, Mike!! Thus closes Eric Hobsbawm's short century. And commences the long, long one each and every one of us must be thankful for, every moment. Thanks, Susan. I would appreciate your forwarding your emails again to my hotmail address. About 09.30.007, I renewed my old hotmail account and got a new one (SHAZAM!); I’ve been trying to figure out which features I do or do not have ever since, and I strongly suspect the two emails to which you refer are somewhere in my mail system, somewhere…..

I think this clears us up otherwise. I intend to buy your book and read (on) it; I seem to be incapable of reading much of anything these days, and I’m dead set on finishing The Shock Doctrine. When I first started posting comments at DV, I included my email address and saved copies of the posts along with the names and dates of the articles they commented upon; but I discontinued both practices six weeks ago or more. I look forward very much to reading your emails to my hotmail address.

Thank you for your perceptive comment. Deadbeat. I became engrossed in my exchange, of email posts to this article, with Gerald Spezio — who speaks for himself early and often — and I didn’t get a chance to express my concurrence with you. Regarding Gerald, Susan, it’s easy to mistake his irony for his straight, especially if you haven’t browsed the comments to a lot of articles at Dissident Voice; and he is anything but simplistic.

Eric I appreciate your understanding. I am basically a frustrated poet, not an essayist. I also write vignettes which are not even the length of short stories; or, I should say, I’ve written two vignettes. I assure you I’ve read and thought about the long, the short, and the in-between-length articles put up at Dissident Voice; and I can’t find myself in them. I also assure you that I know honey draws better than vinegar. I’m working on my rage, I know it’s done little for me in my life, but these are days of rage…you know? I also do not think labels are important, which brings us back to where I came in. Dissident Voice of all places should not be averse to printing articles by writers which contain confessions of communist inclinations, or past CP membership. But to repeat assertions I’ve made in prior posted comments at DV: I am a Cuba communist, and I understand that communism as a social system is immeasurably older than capitalism, which really got started only in the 14th century. Regarding saying things “decently” and “somewhat leftish”? I refer you to Arthur Silber’s most recent writings. And regarding Susan’s comment to you, I was wondering what PARECON meant.

John, you are absolutely right!!

And Yo, Mike!! Thus closes Eric Hobsbawm’s short century. And commences the long, long one each and every one of us must be thankful for, every moment.

]]> By: Susan Rosenthal http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8598 Susan Rosenthal Thu, 08 Nov 2007 12:27:46 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8598 LLoyd, I apologize for the delay in responding --- I was working all day yesterday. I don't understand your attack, because I replied to both of your prior comments, but not in the comments page of DV. I emailed you personally to thank you for your ecouraging words. I will forward these emails to you again, as a reminder. If I erred in corrresponding with you personally instead of publicly, then I apologize. As for my politics, they are clear in my book and all of my writings. I am a classical marxist and an unapologetic advocate for workers' control over production and society. Deadbeat, When I say "we" create capitalism, I am referring to the fact that all social arrangements are human creations. Everyday, the living generation reproduces the social system. Understanding this is essential to understand the power that we have to change society. Eric, Thank you for your support. I address PARECON in my book, POWER and Powerlessness (pp.191-192). Gerald, You make the mistake of fetishizing capitalism, treating it like an alien entity, outside the realm of human experience, that descended upon an unwitting species in a magical way (SHAZAM). This is nonsense. All human societies are created by human beings, whether or not those who create them are conscious of doing so or not. John, You are aboslutely right! We need to build a new society BECAUSE people's basic needs are not being met. LLoyd,
I apologize for the delay in responding — I was working all day yesterday.
I don’t understand your attack, because I replied to both of your prior comments, but not in the comments page of DV.
I emailed you personally to thank you for your ecouraging words.
I will forward these emails to you again, as a reminder.
If I erred in corrresponding with you personally instead of publicly, then I apologize.
As for my politics, they are clear in my book and all of my writings. I am a classical marxist and an unapologetic advocate for workers’ control over production and society.

Deadbeat,
When I say “we” create capitalism, I am referring to the fact that all social arrangements are human creations. Everyday, the living generation reproduces the social system. Understanding this is essential to understand the power that we have to change society.

Eric,
Thank you for your support. I address PARECON in my book, POWER and Powerlessness (pp.191-192).

Gerald,
You make the mistake of fetishizing capitalism, treating it like an alien entity, outside the realm of human experience, that descended upon an unwitting species in a magical way (SHAZAM). This is nonsense. All human societies are created by human beings, whether or not those who create them are conscious of doing so or not.

John,
You are aboslutely right! We need to build a new society BECAUSE people’s basic needs are not being met.

]]> By: Mike McNiven http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8594 Mike McNiven Thu, 08 Nov 2007 08:06:28 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8594 Happy anniversary of the Russian Revolution! Happy anniversary of the Russian Revolution!

]]> By: Eric Patton http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8589 Eric Patton Thu, 08 Nov 2007 04:34:13 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8589 Lloyd, if you consider yourself a Communist, that's fine. It's not a label I would affix to myself, but if it makes you happy, more power to you. I don't know the DV editors personally. But my guess is that, if you wrote a piece on something-or-other, and you mentioned your Communist sympathies in the piece, that as long as the piece were cogent, they'd run it. Put another way, I doubt DV would care how you described yourself, as long as the piece had something to say, said it decently, and was at least somewhat leftish. I don't see why you need a personal response from Rosenthal on anything you've written though. However, speaking from my own plethora of bridge-burning experiences, I can say that you're more likely to get a response from her (or anyone) with a polite tone. Emulating my own poor past behaviors is not your best move; for God's sake be better than me. Lloyd, if you consider yourself a Communist, that’s fine. It’s not a label I would affix to myself, but if it makes you happy, more power to you.

I don’t know the DV editors personally. But my guess is that, if you wrote a piece on something-or-other, and you mentioned your Communist sympathies in the piece, that as long as the piece were cogent, they’d run it. Put another way, I doubt DV would care how you described yourself, as long as the piece had something to say, said it decently, and was at least somewhat leftish.

I don’t see why you need a personal response from Rosenthal on anything you’ve written though. However, speaking from my own plethora of bridge-burning experiences, I can say that you’re more likely to get a response from her (or anyone) with a polite tone. Emulating my own poor past behaviors is not your best move; for God’s sake be better than me.

]]> By: John Wilkinson http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8579 John Wilkinson Thu, 08 Nov 2007 00:15:40 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8579 Yes, Susan, you're a doctor -- a previous responder was so ecstatic that the medical profession is seeing the light. But is it? So, why don't we start with disassembling capitalism in your profession? How about rolling back those outrageous fees for every little thing, the double billing, the bill padding, the Medicaid/Medicare fraud. What about the unfettered monopolistic power of the American Medical Association to set prices, to limit competition, etc. What are YOU going to do about that? $120 syringes; $700 ob-gyn exam (that my wife had for 10 mins of a nurse's time); $120 for a 2-min face to face with a medical trainee; drugs that are 3 times more expensive than in Canada (and 10 times more than in some European countries) (and getting drugs from Canada is illegal, because, guess what, they may be unsafe, and they -- you, are "concerned" about our health (as opposed to your pockets); a new eye exam needed for each brand of contact lens prescription, even though all contact lens brands use the same exact measurements. Six thousand dollars for a piece of wire to hold your teeth together. Several hundred dollars for eyeglasses (another piece of wire). $250 for a sonogram that costs $20 in Europe. Etc., etc., etc., these are just some recent examples from my experience. It is hard to build a new society when your basic needs -- health, are not met. Yes, Susan, you’re a doctor — a previous responder was so ecstatic that the medical profession is seeing the light. But is it? So, why don’t we start with disassembling capitalism in your profession? How about rolling back those outrageous fees for every little thing, the double billing, the bill padding, the Medicaid/Medicare fraud. What about the unfettered monopolistic power of the American Medical Association to set prices, to limit competition, etc. What are YOU going to do about that?

$120 syringes; $700 ob-gyn exam (that my wife had for 10 mins of a nurse’s time); $120 for a 2-min face to face with a medical trainee; drugs that are 3 times more expensive than in Canada (and 10 times more than in some European countries) (and getting drugs from Canada is illegal, because, guess what, they may be unsafe, and they — you, are “concerned” about our health (as opposed to your pockets); a new eye exam needed for each brand of contact lens prescription, even though all contact lens brands use the same exact measurements. Six thousand dollars for a piece of wire to hold your teeth together. Several hundred dollars for eyeglasses (another piece of wire). $250 for a sonogram that costs $20 in Europe. Etc., etc., etc., these are just some recent examples from my experience.

It is hard to build a new society when your basic needs — health, are not met.

]]> By: Lloyd Rowsey http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8573 Lloyd Rowsey Wed, 07 Nov 2007 21:13:47 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8573 Well thanks I guess, GS. But what now? Nobody posts anything after this post, and what? None of Patton's famous "three editors"; not Patton; not Dr Rosenthal herself; not one of them replies to my question about whether using the word "communist" in self-reference in DV is verboten. Will you be happy with that? Will you think that I should be? (By the bye, a Search of DV on “communist” yields 133 results, but I don’t have the time or inclination to start reading the references to see if any of them uses the word in self-reference to the author/authoress.) Well thanks I guess, GS. But what now? Nobody posts anything after this post, and what? None of Patton’s famous “three editors”; not Patton; not Dr Rosenthal herself; not one of them replies to my question about whether using the word “communist” in self-reference in DV is verboten.

Will you be happy with that? Will you think that I should be?

(By the bye, a Search of DV on “communist” yields 133 results, but I don’t have the time or inclination to start reading the references to see if any of them uses the word in self-reference to the author/authoress.)

]]> By: gerald spezio http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8566 gerald spezio Wed, 07 Nov 2007 18:24:47 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/the-infinite-potential-of-the-human-mind/#comment-8566 Lloyd, Eric, and Deadbeat; I would suggest that Dr. Rosenthal check her epistemology, or her complete lack of any epistemology. She may be writing for new agers, but she sure as hell isn't doing science or any semblance of science. The human species was going along just great by exercising their infinite minds and living super harmoniously, but then suddenly and very abruptly a long time ago the whole species was completely cut off and abjectly cornholed by nebulous capitalism? SHAZAM, the totally captivating capitalism completely took over the "minds" of the formerly happy campers. The "complex dance between human beings" was summarily snuffed out. If that wasn't terrible enough, it got worse. Because; "To preserve itself, capitalism must block the infinite potential of the human mind." Forever! The "minds" of the socially disconnected masses crumble. The bewildered masses become very angry, frustrated, and pissed off. But their anger is labeled, "mental illness." A trained doctor and healer "explains" it all to the crumpled minds of the masses who decide that they are fed up with all the bamboozling from the capitalists. Although there are no specific operationalized instructions, the masses "change their minds" and escape the "historical rut" imposed by capitalism. The crumpled minds abruptly un- crumble and there is "a global mind change" just like Willis Harman said. This poor woman appears to be completely serious. Lloyd, Eric, and Deadbeat; I would suggest that Dr. Rosenthal check her epistemology, or her complete lack of any epistemology.

She may be writing for new agers, but she sure as hell isn’t doing science or any semblance of science.

The human species was going along just great by exercising their infinite minds and living super harmoniously, but then suddenly and very abruptly a long time ago the whole species was completely cut off and abjectly cornholed by nebulous capitalism?

SHAZAM, the totally captivating capitalism completely took over the “minds” of the formerly happy campers.

The “complex dance between human beings” was summarily snuffed out.

If that wasn’t terrible enough, it got worse.
Because; “To preserve itself, capitalism must block the infinite potential of the human mind.”
Forever!

The “minds” of the socially disconnected masses crumble.
The bewildered masses become very angry, frustrated, and pissed off.
But their anger is labeled, “mental illness.”

A trained doctor and healer “explains” it all to the crumpled minds of the masses who decide that they are fed up with all the bamboozling from the capitalists.

Although there are no specific operationalized instructions, the masses “change their minds” and escape the “historical rut” imposed by capitalism.
The crumpled minds abruptly un- crumble and there is “a global mind change” just like Willis Harman said.

This poor woman appears to be completely serious.

]]>