<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Democratic Debate Diabetes and the Mexican Revolution</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/democratic-debate-diabetes-and-the-mexican-revolution/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/democratic-debate-diabetes-and-the-mexican-revolution/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcelle Cendra</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/democratic-debate-diabetes-and-the-mexican-revolution/#comment-9340</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcelle Cendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 08:41:07 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/democratic-debate-diabetes-and-the-mexican-revolution/#comment-9340</guid>
		<description>Hi, Lloyd. For starters, please note that your emails to me have been returned as undeliverable. That should be corrected so that we can communicate privately. In confidence. Once that&#039;s straightened out, I&#039;d be very happy to set up a rendezvous and share the ideas with you. I submitted my proposal tonight as per the request of a leader in the (California) Latino community, and I expect a response very shortly. I had met with him earlier today, and he seemed to approve of the basics; he requested an email delineation of the concepts. He has access to a huge number of union workers and others (who have much reason to move in solidarity), and I want to underscore, once again, that this &quot;new approach&quot; should pull in high stakes, and prove to be quite an historic accomplishment. Inspiring loads of people on the fence.  I appreciate the interest expressed by Lloyd. I&#039;d like some others to jump on board here. Thanks for your kind consideration, Marcelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi, Lloyd. For starters, please note that your emails to me have been returned as undeliverable. That should be corrected so that we can communicate privately. In confidence. Once that&#8217;s straightened out, I&#8217;d be very happy to set up a rendezvous and share the ideas with you. I submitted my proposal tonight as per the request of a leader in the (California) Latino community, and I expect a response very shortly. I had met with him earlier today, and he seemed to approve of the basics; he requested an email delineation of the concepts. He has access to a huge number of union workers and others (who have much reason to move in solidarity), and I want to underscore, once again, that this &#8220;new approach&#8221; should pull in high stakes, and prove to be quite an historic accomplishment. Inspiring loads of people on the fence.  I appreciate the interest expressed by Lloyd. I&#8217;d like some others to jump on board here. Thanks for your kind consideration, Marcelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Lloyd Rowsey</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/democratic-debate-diabetes-and-the-mexican-revolution/#comment-9327</link>
		<dc:creator>Lloyd Rowsey</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 04:51:37 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/democratic-debate-diabetes-and-the-mexican-revolution/#comment-9327</guid>
		<description>I&#039;d like to express my support for a new electoral system paradigm, a different way to approach getting people elected.  I live in the Bay Area and I would appreciate more information, Marcelle, about what is &quot;on the table for discussion now.&quot;  There&#039;s such disgust as I&#039;ve never seen with politics-as-practised!  It&#039;s profound and it&#039;s everywhere.  

Something MIGHT be done.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I&#8217;d like to express my support for a new electoral system paradigm, a different way to approach getting people elected.  I live in the Bay Area and I would appreciate more information, Marcelle, about what is &#8220;on the table for discussion now.&#8221;  There&#8217;s such disgust as I&#8217;ve never seen with politics-as-practised!  It&#8217;s profound and it&#8217;s everywhere.  </p>
<p>Something MIGHT be done.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Marcelle Cendra</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/democratic-debate-diabetes-and-the-mexican-revolution/#comment-9312</link>
		<dc:creator>Marcelle Cendra</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 20 Nov 2007 01:22:46 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/democratic-debate-diabetes-and-the-mexican-revolution/#comment-9312</guid>
		<description>I just came from meeting with a very influential member of the Latino community (including union members, et. al.)...for the purpose of making use of the electoral system following a new paradigm. Ordinarily, I&#039;d have absolutely no hope for anything positive coming out of engagement with electoral politics. However, this meeting was promising. There is a new model on the table for discussion now. And anyone living in the Bay Area and thereabouts in California should be a candidate for meeting with us...to make a difference. I thank Dan for his joining in here. I&#039;d like to take the &quot;disenchantment&quot; down a singular road now, if there&#039;s any solidarity to be had out there. -- Marcelle</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I just came from meeting with a very influential member of the Latino community (including union members, et. al.)&#8230;for the purpose of making use of the electoral system following a new paradigm. Ordinarily, I&#8217;d have absolutely no hope for anything positive coming out of engagement with electoral politics. However, this meeting was promising. There is a new model on the table for discussion now. And anyone living in the Bay Area and thereabouts in California should be a candidate for meeting with us&#8230;to make a difference. I thank Dan for his joining in here. I&#8217;d like to take the &#8220;disenchantment&#8221; down a singular road now, if there&#8217;s any solidarity to be had out there. &#8212; Marcelle</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: dan elliott</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/democratic-debate-diabetes-and-the-mexican-revolution/#comment-9290</link>
		<dc:creator>dan elliott</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 19 Nov 2007 19:55:48 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/11/democratic-debate-diabetes-and-the-mexican-revolution/#comment-9290</guid>
		<description>hear hear. 

the rethuglicans are great liars but they are paragons of candor compared to the Dumbockrats. GOPers are primarily concerned about the interests of the Affluent &amp; White American, will the Dems stock in trade is being All Things To All People. It&#039;s like Marx&#039;s &quot;alienation effect&quot; where the worker&#039;s own labor keeps him in exploited subjection: in the USA today, the concerned citizen activists&#039; own attempts to &quot;participate&quot; wind up reinforcing the Imperial State With A Twist of Zionism. 
For instance, the Civil Rights movement ended legal Segregation but didn&#039;t stop Jim Crow. &quot;Integration&quot; turned out to mean Mass Incarceration. &quot;Black Empowerment&quot; turned out to mean  the vast Suit &amp; Tie Subliminal  Plantation, typified by the Cong. Blk. Caucus.  The &quot;inside[outside strategy&quot; turns out to mean &quot;Protest is okay, but you have to get our permission first&quot;.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>hear hear. </p>
<p>the rethuglicans are great liars but they are paragons of candor compared to the Dumbockrats. GOPers are primarily concerned about the interests of the Affluent &amp; White American, will the Dems stock in trade is being All Things To All People. It&#8217;s like Marx&#8217;s &#8220;alienation effect&#8221; where the worker&#8217;s own labor keeps him in exploited subjection: in the USA today, the concerned citizen activists&#8217; own attempts to &#8220;participate&#8221; wind up reinforcing the Imperial State With A Twist of Zionism.<br />
For instance, the Civil Rights movement ended legal Segregation but didn&#8217;t stop Jim Crow. &#8220;Integration&#8221; turned out to mean Mass Incarceration. &#8220;Black Empowerment&#8221; turned out to mean  the vast Suit &amp; Tie Subliminal  Plantation, typified by the Cong. Blk. Caucus.  The &#8220;inside[outside strategy&#8221; turns out to mean &#8220;Protest is okay, but you have to get our permission first&#8221;.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

