Comments on: The Topic of Cancer http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/ a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.1 By: EnvegmenT http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-36989 EnvegmenT Thu, 22 Jan 2009 00:20:46 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-36989 Nothing seems to be easier than seeing someone whom you can help but not helping. I suggest we start giving it a try. Give love to the ones that need it. God will appreciate it. Nothing seems to be easier than seeing someone whom you can help but not helping.
I suggest we start giving it a try. Give love to the ones that need it.
God will appreciate it.

]]> By: Eskimosik http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-9347 Eskimosik Tue, 20 Nov 2007 15:47:25 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-9347 Hi What do you think about this? When it happens? Hi

What do you think about this? When it happens?

]]> By: Eskimosik http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-9291 Eskimosik Mon, 19 Nov 2007 20:24:51 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-9291 Hello What do you think about this? When it happens? Hello

What do you think about this? When it happens?

]]> By: e.a.greenhalgh http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-7856 e.a.greenhalgh Tue, 23 Oct 2007 01:03:58 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-7856 The cancer establishment has good and bad people ,but many people are in cancer research like people are mechanics or butchers or ditch diggers , it is a job. And any job is easier if you don't think but do routine. I had cancer like Lance Armstrong, at the same time and used my own research theories to treat the cancer and ten years later over 20 catscans etc , I am cured and cancer free. No chemo. No radiation. No secondary tumours like Mr Armstrong. And I am a black listed scientist so academic fraud by Yale and the University of Waterloo (RIM,the blackberry) could be covered up.See my website www.cancerfraudbadbiotech.com for details. What is cancer,all cancers are special conditions of genes and the origin of life as explained by V.T.T. on my website. And hormones are special evolutionary developments of virus communication which is why hormone therapy is now being used and works, and can be the basis for scientific altenative treatment without chemo or radiation. But I am blacklisted and most cancer researchers are not saints or even good people but merely people with jobs. Like a car mechanic who will be nice to you if you pay him.Very few mechanics will do something for nothing except a few saints, just like there are a few exceptions in cancer research. If you want to make cancer history tell people to read my website and maybe chemo and radiation will be(in the words of Dr. McCoy of Star Trek) something of barbarism from the past. It's up to you, if you will walk or run for the cure for cancer will you read for the cure ? Thank you. Ed A.Greenhalgh The cancer establishment has good and bad people ,but many people are in cancer research like people are mechanics or butchers or ditch diggers , it is a job. And any job is easier if you don’t think but do routine. I had cancer like Lance Armstrong, at the same time and used my own research theories to treat the cancer and ten years later over 20 catscans etc , I am cured and cancer free. No chemo. No radiation. No secondary tumours like Mr Armstrong. And I am a black listed scientist so academic fraud by Yale and the University of Waterloo (RIM,the blackberry) could be covered up.See my website http://www.cancerfraudbadbiotech.com for details. What is cancer,all cancers are special conditions of genes and the origin of life as explained by V.T.T. on my website. And hormones are special evolutionary developments of virus communication which is why hormone therapy is now being used and works, and can be the basis for scientific altenative treatment without chemo or radiation. But I am blacklisted and most cancer researchers are not saints or even good people but merely people with jobs. Like a car mechanic who will be nice to you if you pay him.Very few mechanics will do something for nothing except a few saints, just like there are a few exceptions in cancer research. If you want to make cancer history tell people to read my website and maybe chemo and radiation will be(in the words of Dr. McCoy of Star Trek) something of barbarism from the past. It’s up to you, if you will walk or run for the cure for cancer will you read for the cure ? Thank you. Ed A.Greenhalgh

]]> By: gerald spezio http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-7181 gerald spezio Tue, 09 Oct 2007 19:05:33 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-7181 The medical establishment has plenty of ugly warts, but seeing those warts doesn't demand that anybody shoot himself in his brains. So, don't be a new age shidhead, Mickey. Our brains are some of our best meat, and we must never hurt our own meat. The yuppie boys and girls at Rubenstein want to injure your brain meat. Rubenstein eats meat. http://www.rubenstein.com/ The medical establishment has plenty of ugly warts, but seeing those warts doesn’t demand that anybody shoot himself in his brains.
So, don’t be a new age shidhead, Mickey.
Our brains are some of our best meat, and we must never hurt our own meat.
The yuppie boys and girls at Rubenstein want to injure your brain meat.
Rubenstein eats meat.
http://www.rubenstein.com/

]]> By: CH http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-7174 CH Tue, 09 Oct 2007 17:51:27 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-7174 Mick's all right. His articles tend to be short and not in-depth, but that doesn't mean he doesn't bring up important points worth exploring further. Mick’s all right. His articles tend to be short and not in-depth, but that doesn’t mean he doesn’t bring up important points worth exploring further.

]]> By: gerald spezio http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-7132 gerald spezio Mon, 08 Oct 2007 10:54:53 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-7132 Mickey Z is not a bad guy, but he is way out of intelligent commentary here. Chris has done some gentle but mandatory debunking. The best debunking of Mickey Zs new age alternative medicine is here; http://www.csicop.org/si/2004-05/new-age.html Mickey Z is not a bad guy, but he is way out of intelligent commentary here.
Chris has done some gentle but mandatory debunking.
The best debunking of Mickey Zs new age alternative medicine is here;
http://www.csicop.org/si/2004-05/new-age.html

]]> By: Chris http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-7094 Chris Sun, 07 Oct 2007 18:15:22 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/the-topic-of-cancer/#comment-7094 This overwrought screed is much more heat than light. If you want to take on the Cancer Establishment (a worthy activity), you better have more in your arsenal than emotion and you better take the work seriously enough to provide facts and precise, accurate details. For instance, if it's true that oncologists won't take part in chemotherapy "trials" that is a vastly different decision than that to use standard chemo on patients. A drug trial is just that – testing a new drug. Standard chemo drugs have passed through trials into common use. Not very surprising that oncologists don't want to be guinea pigs for unproven chemicals any more than the average person. Also, using one specious example does not an argument make (technical mistakes happen in every walk of life; tragic yes, meaningful, no). I have a friend whose life was probably saved by a round of low-toxicity chemo – her tumors were dissolved by it and haven't returned. She's now gotten on with a normal life. My one example is an indication that this issue is far more complex and requires careful research and writing. This is an important issue; this piece doesn't do it justice. This overwrought screed is much more heat than light. If you want to take on the Cancer Establishment (a worthy activity), you better have more in your arsenal than emotion and you better take the work seriously enough to provide facts and precise, accurate details.

For instance, if it’s true that oncologists won’t take part in chemotherapy “trials” that is a vastly different decision than that to use standard chemo on patients. A drug trial is just that – testing a new drug. Standard chemo drugs have passed through trials into common use. Not very surprising that oncologists don’t want to be guinea pigs for unproven chemicals any more than the average person.

Also, using one specious example does not an argument make (technical mistakes happen in every walk of life; tragic yes, meaningful, no). I have a friend whose life was probably saved by a round of low-toxicity chemo – her tumors were dissolved by it and haven’t returned. She’s now gotten on with a normal life. My one example is an indication that this issue is far more complex and requires careful research and writing.

This is an important issue; this piece doesn’t do it justice.

]]>