<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Pope Versus President</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pope-versus-president/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pope-versus-president/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sun, 08 Nov 2009 13:29:32 -0800</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Michael Kenny</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pope-versus-president/#comment-7139</link>
		<dc:creator>Michael Kenny</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 08 Oct 2007 15:53:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/10/pope-versus-president/#comment-7139</guid>
		<description>I always say that, fundamentally, Catholicism is a revolutionary ideology and there is nothing &quot;conservative&quot; about it in terms of wanting to &quot;conserve&quot; the world as it is today. There is thus nothing radical about Benedict&#039;s positions. He is following his own logic of re-affirming the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church.

The fun will be Giuliani. He claims to be a Catholic but supports abortion and is no great defender of the sacrament of matrimony either. It seems that the US bishops are going to issue a pastoral letter going into the election and you can bet that it will urge Catholics not to vote for candidates who are pro-choice.  Hillary may be pro-choice, but she is not a Catholic. Forced to choose between a &quot;turncoat&quot; Catholic in disagreement with the Church on almost everything, and someone who is pro-choice on the basis of her own, non-Catholic, religious beliefs, I would guess that many Catholics will choose Hillary.

Even more fun would be an anti-abortion, third-party candidate!

To crown it all, the Pope will be in the US sometime next year. I think in September to address the UN. You can bet your best soutane he will denounce abortion!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I always say that, fundamentally, Catholicism is a revolutionary ideology and there is nothing &#8220;conservative&#8221; about it in terms of wanting to &#8220;conserve&#8221; the world as it is today. There is thus nothing radical about Benedict&#8217;s positions. He is following his own logic of re-affirming the traditional teaching of the Catholic Church.</p>
<p>The fun will be Giuliani. He claims to be a Catholic but supports abortion and is no great defender of the sacrament of matrimony either. It seems that the US bishops are going to issue a pastoral letter going into the election and you can bet that it will urge Catholics not to vote for candidates who are pro-choice.  Hillary may be pro-choice, but she is not a Catholic. Forced to choose between a &#8220;turncoat&#8221; Catholic in disagreement with the Church on almost everything, and someone who is pro-choice on the basis of her own, non-Catholic, religious beliefs, I would guess that many Catholics will choose Hillary.</p>
<p>Even more fun would be an anti-abortion, third-party candidate!</p>
<p>To crown it all, the Pope will be in the US sometime next year. I think in September to address the UN. You can bet your best soutane he will denounce abortion!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
