Comments on: The Framework for Debate on Iran: Existing U.S. Policy and Its Peaceful Alternative http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/the-framework-for-debate-on-iran-existing-us-policy-and-its-peaceful-alternative/ a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice Sun, 08 Nov 2009 20:26:36 -0800 http://wordpress.org/?v=2.8.4 hourly 1 By: Mike McNiven http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/the-framework-for-debate-on-iran-existing-us-policy-and-its-peaceful-alternative/#comment-7359 Mike McNiven Mon, 15 Oct 2007 07:54:13 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/the-framework-for-debate-on-iran-existing-us-policy-and-its-peaceful-alternative/#comment-7359 A different framework for debate which is anti-imperialist, anti-capitalist, anti-war, anti-racism, pro-environment : http://www.counterpunch.org/fiyouzat09292007.html A different framework for debate which is anti-imperialist, anti-capitalist, anti-war, anti-racism, pro-environment :
http://www.counterpunch.org/fiyouzat09292007.html

]]> By: Shabnam http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/the-framework-for-debate-on-iran-existing-us-policy-and-its-peaceful-alternative/#comment-5696 Shabnam Tue, 11 Sep 2007 03:05:03 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/the-framework-for-debate-on-iran-existing-us-policy-and-its-peaceful-alternative/#comment-5696 Hassan Daioleslam -who has been introduced by the person who wrote the first comment, he must be either an Iranian from the opposition, or a Zionist -is a reactionary person with NO CREDENTIAL what so ever, because what he is preaching is nothing but RUBBISH. He is for "regime change" American style and has spoken on Voice of America, VOA, twice if not more to present his rubbish which he calls "Iran lobby" in America. He is not AN SCHOLAR by any means and his analysis brings to many nothing but a hard LAUGH. Hassan Daioleslam -who has been introduced by the person who wrote the first comment, he must be either an Iranian from the opposition, or a Zionist -is a reactionary person with NO CREDENTIAL what so ever, because what he is preaching is nothing but RUBBISH. He is for “regime change” American style and has spoken on Voice of America, VOA, twice if not more to present his rubbish which he calls “Iran lobby” in America. He is not AN SCHOLAR by any means and his analysis brings to many nothing but a hard LAUGH.

]]> By: Jeremy R. Hammond http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/the-framework-for-debate-on-iran-existing-us-policy-and-its-peaceful-alternative/#comment-4889 Jeremy R. Hammond Thu, 30 Aug 2007 09:28:59 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/the-framework-for-debate-on-iran-existing-us-policy-and-its-peaceful-alternative/#comment-4889 As far as I can tell, the portion of the article relevent to the discussion here is the authors statement, “I wholeheartedly believe that a US war against Iran will be a catastrophe of unbelievable dimensions.” As I wrote before in response to the several other links you posted critical of Iran (rightfully), “I wrote an article about US policy towards Iran and its consequences. A number of people have responded pointing out the oppressive nature of the Iranian regime. I agree and also think it’s horrible. Iran is hardly alone in being worthy of our criticism. However, it’s irrelevant to the point, unless, of course, people are trying to argue that US policy is justified because of the lack of justice and democracy in Iran. I don’t assume anyone is making that argument, but otherwise I don’t see the relevancy to the point of the article.” As far as I can tell, the portion of the article relevent to the discussion here is the authors statement, “I wholeheartedly believe that a US war against Iran will be a catastrophe of unbelievable dimensions.”

As I wrote before in response to the several other links you posted critical of Iran (rightfully), “I wrote an article about US policy towards Iran and its consequences. A number of people have responded pointing out the oppressive nature of the Iranian regime. I agree and also think it’s horrible. Iran is hardly alone in being worthy of our criticism. However, it’s irrelevant to the point, unless, of course, people are trying to argue that US policy is justified because of the lack of justice and democracy in Iran. I don’t assume anyone is making that argument, but otherwise I don’t see the relevancy to the point of the article.”

]]> By: Mike McNiven http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/the-framework-for-debate-on-iran-existing-us-policy-and-its-peaceful-alternative/#comment-4877 Mike McNiven Thu, 30 Aug 2007 07:13:55 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/the-framework-for-debate-on-iran-existing-us-policy-and-its-peaceful-alternative/#comment-4877 Please see an Iranian scholar’s view who lives in exile and –based on his own words– cares about Peace and Social Justice in his homeland: http://www.losangeleschronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=35885 Please see an Iranian scholar’s view who lives in exile and –based on his own words– cares about Peace and Social Justice in his homeland:

http://www.losangeleschronicle.com/articles/viewArticle.asp?articleID=35885

]]>