http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/saying-no-to-the-hunters-of-goliath/ a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice Thu, 08 Dec 2011 15:07:30 +0000 hourly 1 http://wordpress.org/?v=3.3.2 http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/saying-no-to-the-hunters-of-goliath/#comment-4077 LanceThruster Tue, 14 Aug 2007 20:16:16 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/saying-no-to-the-hunters-of-goliath/#comment-4077 Gilad Atzmon is a much needed voice of reason, clarity, and objectiveness. I pay him the highest compliment in that I have learned much from his writings, and largely because of them have joined to fight for justice for the Palestinian people. He is a humanist treasure. Gilad Atzmon is a much needed voice of reason, clarity, and objectiveness. I pay him the highest compliment in that I have learned much from his writings, and largely because of them have joined to fight for justice for the Palestinian people. He is a humanist treasure.

]]> http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/saying-no-to-the-hunters-of-goliath/#comment-4075 Saying NO to the Hunters of Goliath « Dr Nasir Khan Tue, 14 Aug 2007 19:06:34 +0000 http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/08/saying-no-to-the-hunters-of-goliath/#comment-4075 [...] by Gilad Atzmon / August 14th, 2007 A few reasons help to create the Nasrallah obsession (‘dibuk’), that influenced decision makers along the (Second Lebanon) war. Primarily, Israel always perceived the Arab (leaders) as (private) people rather than representatives of political systems. Even amongst media analysts and politicians the references were pointing at “Assad”, “Arafat” or “Nasrallah” rather than the states and organisations they represent. In the eyes of the (Israeli) decision-makers, as well as the media and public, the Arab world was led by individuals rather than by governmental systems and the best way to influence it was in most cases to drop a bomb in the right place. (“Captives in Lebanon”, Ofer Shelah and Yaov Limor)1 [...] [...] by Gilad Atzmon / August 14th, 2007 A few reasons help to create the Nasrallah obsession (‘dibuk’), that influenced decision makers along the (Second Lebanon) war. Primarily, Israel always perceived the Arab (leaders) as (private) people rather than representatives of political systems. Even amongst media analysts and politicians the references were pointing at “Assad”, “Arafat” or “Nasrallah” rather than the states and organisations they represent. In the eyes of the (Israeli) decision-makers, as well as the media and public, the Arab world was led by individuals rather than by governmental systems and the best way to influence it was in most cases to drop a bomb in the right place. (“Captives in Lebanon”, Ofer Shelah and Yaov Limor)1 [...]

]]>