<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Evolutionary Cognitive Neuroscience</title>
	<atom:link href="http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/06/evolutionary-cognitive-neuroscience/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/06/evolutionary-cognitive-neuroscience/</link>
	<description>a radical newsletter in the struggle for peace and social justice</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 08 May 2013 02:53:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: Rowan Berkeley</title>
		<link>http://dissidentvoice.org/2007/06/evolutionary-cognitive-neuroscience/#comment-2160</link>
		<dc:creator>Rowan Berkeley</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 01 Jul 2007 07:17:26 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://www.dissidentvoice.org/2007/06/evolutionary-cognitive-neuroscience/#comment-2160</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[When marxisant liberals claim to have extracted the most important elements from Marx, they usually leave the dialectic behind. Veblen&#039;s industrial sociology is a good example, in that when you read his longer online texts you discover that he proposes to subordinate Marx to Darwin. In the same way, the bourgeois theoreticians of global control pursue a circular logic of justification, in which the liberal society is a given, and all that remains is adjustment of its subjects.

I should add though that, from a psychological warfare point of view, it is not the reality of psychotronic engineering, but the mere threat of it, that produces profound (and quite understandable) defensive  mass urges towards conformism. When these reach a certain point of abjection, the power holders can begin to reconstruct &#039;conformity&#039; itself, as a guessing game to which only they know the answers (as with Orwell&#039;s O&#039;Brien).]]></description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>When marxisant liberals claim to have extracted the most important elements from Marx, they usually leave the dialectic behind. Veblen&#8217;s industrial sociology is a good example, in that when you read his longer online texts you discover that he proposes to subordinate Marx to Darwin. In the same way, the bourgeois theoreticians of global control pursue a circular logic of justification, in which the liberal society is a given, and all that remains is adjustment of its subjects.</p>
<p>I should add though that, from a psychological warfare point of view, it is not the reality of psychotronic engineering, but the mere threat of it, that produces profound (and quite understandable) defensive  mass urges towards conformism. When these reach a certain point of abjection, the power holders can begin to reconstruct &#8216;conformity&#8217; itself, as a guessing game to which only they know the answers (as with Orwell&#8217;s O&#8217;Brien).</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
